• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海绵体内自我注射血管活性药物治疗阳痿:615例患者的8年经验

Intracavernous self-injection of vasoactive drugs in the treatment of impotence: 8-year experience with 615 cases.

作者信息

Virag R, Shoukry K, Floresco J, Nollet F, Greco E

机构信息

Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches de l'Impuissance, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Urol. 1991 Feb;145(2):287-92; discussion 292-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38316-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38316-7
PMID:1671107
Abstract

Of 615 patients with impotence of varying etiologies who were followed from 12 to 96 months after the institution of intracavernous self-injection therapy with vasoactive drugs (papaverine alone, papaverine and alpha-blockers, and Ceritine, a new multilevel acting drug) 87% (533 patients) returned for followup visits or were regularly contacted. Of these patients sexual activity was restored in 91%. The dropout rate was 11.25%. The 114 episodes of prolonged erections among 51 patients (4.57%) represented less than 3 per 1,000 of the 34,875 recorded injections. All patients were treated without complications. The percentage of patients suffering from nodules or permanent deformations was 2.8%. There were no cases of intracavernous fibrosis. The percentage of satisfied patients (satisfaction index 7 or greater) was 84.8%. Improvement in spontaneous erections during sexual intercourse was obtained in 65% of the cases: 15% no longer needed self-injections and 50% only used them occasionally while 35% remained entirely dependent.

摘要

615例病因各异的阳痿患者在采用血管活性药物(单独使用罂粟碱、罂粟碱与α受体阻滞剂以及新型多级作用药物西力士)进行海绵体内自我注射治疗后的12至96个月内接受随访,其中87%(533例患者)前来复诊或保持定期联系。在这些患者中,91%恢复了性活动。失访率为11.25%。51例患者(4.57%)出现114次持续性勃起,在记录的34,875次注射中,发生率低于千分之三。所有患者治疗过程均无并发症。出现硬结或永久性畸形的患者比例为2.8%。未发生海绵体内纤维化病例。满意患者(满意度指数为7或更高)的比例为84.8%。65%的患者在性交时自发性勃起得到改善:15%不再需要自我注射,50%仅偶尔使用,35%仍完全依赖自我注射。

相似文献

1
Intracavernous self-injection of vasoactive drugs in the treatment of impotence: 8-year experience with 615 cases.海绵体内自我注射血管活性药物治疗阳痿:615例患者的8年经验
J Urol. 1991 Feb;145(2):287-92; discussion 292-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38316-7.
2
[Intracavernous pharmacotherapy for treatment and evaluation of impotence].[阴茎海绵体内药物治疗用于阳痿的治疗与评估]
Harefuah. 1991 Oct;121(7-8):223-5.
3
Four-drug intracavernous therapy for impotence due to corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction.用于治疗海绵体静脉闭塞功能障碍所致阳痿的四联药物海绵体内注射疗法。
J Urol. 1993 May;149(5 Pt 2):1291-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36371-1.
4
Intracavernous drug-induced erections in the management of male erectile dysfunction: experience with 100 patients.阴茎海绵体内注射药物治疗男性勃起功能障碍:100例患者的经验
J Urol. 1986 Apr;135(4):704-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45825-3.
5
[Current role of intracavernous therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction].[海绵体内注射疗法在勃起功能障碍治疗中的当前作用]
Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jun;55(5):475-82.
6
[Intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs for treating erectile impotence].[海绵体内注射血管活性药物治疗勃起功能障碍]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Feb;34(2):301-4.
7
[Clinical evaluation of intracavernous self-injection of vasoactive drugs for impotence: a long-term follow-up observation].[海绵体内注射血管活性药物治疗阳痿的临床评估:长期随访观察]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1994 Jan;40(1):37-41.
8
Prostaglandin E1 with phentolamine for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.前列腺素E1联合酚妥拉明治疗勃起功能障碍
Int J Impot Res. 1996 Mar;8(1):5-7.
9
[Intracavernous injections of vasoactive drugs. Evaluation of their diagnostic and therapeutic value in 65 cases of erectile impotence].[海绵体内注射血管活性药物。65例勃起功能障碍患者的诊断和治疗价值评估]
J Urol (Paris). 1986;92(2):111-6.
10
[Intracavernous injections: role in the diagnosis and therapy of problems in erection].海绵体内注射:在勃起功能障碍诊断和治疗中的作用
Journ Annu Diabetol Hotel Dieu. 1993:359-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Post-RALP SUI and ED - What are and What Should we be Doing?RALP 术后尿失禁和勃起功能障碍的管理 - 我们应该做什么?
Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Nov 15;26(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01249-x.
2
Erectile Dysfunction: Key Role of Cavernous Smooth Muscle Cells.勃起功能障碍:海绵体平滑肌细胞的关键作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 5;13:895044. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.895044. eCollection 2022.
3
Relationships between erectile dysfunction, prostate cancer treatment type and inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.勃起功能障碍、前列腺癌治疗类型与可充气阴茎假体植入之间的关系。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 May;63(3):316-324. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210445.
4
Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.前列腺癌根治术后勃起功能障碍的发生率及推荐的治疗方法综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2021 May;33(4):401-409. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00374-8. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Erectile dysfunction.勃起功能障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Feb 4;2:16003. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.3.
6
A study of the possible effects of repeated intracorporeal self-injection of vasoactive drugs in patients with elevated end diastolic velocity during pharmacopenile duplex ultrasonography.一项关于阴茎药物双功超声检查时舒张末期速度升高的患者反复体内自我注射血管活性药物可能产生的影响的研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2013;66(2):210-4. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.02.art25. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
7
Long-term satisfaction and predictors of use of intracorporeal injections for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.前列腺癌根治术后患者体内注射治疗勃起功能障碍的长期满意度和影响使用的因素。
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.089. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
8
Advances in the Management of Post-Radical Prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: Treatment Strategies When PDE-5 Inhibitors Don't Work.根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的管理进展:磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂无效时的治疗策略
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S39-50.
9
Safety and tolerability of oral erectile dysfunction treatments in the elderly.老年人口服勃起功能障碍治疗药物的安全性和耐受性。
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(4):323-38. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522040-00005.
10
Economic cost of male erectile dysfunction using a decision analytic model: for a hypothetical managed-care plan of 100,000 members.使用决策分析模型评估男性勃起功能障碍的经济成本:以一个拥有10万名成员的假设性管理式医疗计划为例。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jan;17(1):77-107. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00006.