Nishida H, Grooters R K, Soltanzadeh H, Thiemen K C, Schneider R F
Department of Surgery, Iowa Methodist Medical Center, Des Moines.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Feb;172(2):161-74.
Poor quality or inadequate length of venous and mammary conduits, or both, a severely calcified or atherosclerotic aorta, or diffuse coronary atherosclerosis are situations cardiovascular surgeons will be facing with increasing frequency. These conditions are more common to the increasing number of patients requiring reoperation for advancing disease and to the growing number of older patients requiring operation. Decisions will be made preoperatively or intraoperatively about the technique to be used. Extensive use of the internal mammary arterial graft, such as bilateral internal mammary artery bypass, sequential use of the mammary artery and use of a free internal mammary artery graft, are excellent choices. These methods can overcome some of the difficult situations of the severely calcified atherosclerotic aorta or the absence of adequate venous conduits. Coronary arterial bypass using the inverted internal mammary conduit has too low a flow to be considered. Composite conduits will help gain the length needed to solve both the inadequate length problem and the severely diseased aorta. Little clinical experience is reported to date. These methods should only be used when nothing else is available. The innominate to coronary arterial bypass and the left subclavian to coronary arterial bypass can help solve the problem of the severely atherosclerotic aorta. The coronary to coronary arterial bypass has been used to solve both the severely diseased aorta and the short conduit situation. These methods, while ingenious, are supported only by occasional isolated clinical experiences. A large number of researchers have done extensive work on the selective retrograde coronary venous bypass grafting, but the last published article of any clinical importance dates back to 1979 and this suggests that other alternatives may be better. This technique should be used as a last resort. The surgical arteriovenous fistula has been clinically applied during the coronary artery bypass procedure. The nonconduit revascularization technique of coronary artery endarterectomy is needed in the armamentarium of the surgeon. This technique is not ideal but presently has better results than intraoperative transluminal coronary angioplasty and far better results than laser angioplasty. These methods may be useful to solve the diffuse coronary arterial problem, but sequential grafting techniques should be considered first.
静脉和乳腺血管桥质量差或长度不足,或两者兼而有之,严重钙化或动脉粥样硬化的主动脉,或弥漫性冠状动脉粥样硬化,是心血管外科医生将越来越频繁面临的情况。这些情况在越来越多因病情进展需要再次手术的患者以及越来越多需要手术的老年患者中更为常见。术前或术中需要就所使用的技术做出决策。广泛使用乳内动脉移植物,如双侧乳内动脉搭桥、乳内动脉的序贯使用以及游离乳内动脉移植物的使用,都是很好的选择。这些方法可以克服严重钙化的动脉粥样硬化主动脉或缺乏足够静脉血管桥的一些困难情况。使用倒置乳内血管桥进行冠状动脉搭桥的血流量过低,不予考虑。复合血管桥有助于获得解决长度不足问题和严重病变主动脉所需的长度。迄今为止,报道的临床经验很少。这些方法仅应在没有其他可用方法时使用。无名动脉至冠状动脉搭桥和左锁骨下动脉至冠状动脉搭桥有助于解决严重动脉粥样硬化主动脉的问题。冠状动脉至冠状动脉搭桥已用于解决严重病变的主动脉和血管桥短的情况。这些方法虽然巧妙,但仅得到偶尔的个别临床经验支持。大量研究人员对选择性逆行冠状动脉静脉搭桥进行了广泛研究,但最后一篇具有任何临床重要性的发表文章可追溯到1979年,则表明其他替代方法可能更好。该技术应作为最后手段使用。外科动静脉瘘已在冠状动脉搭桥手术中临床应用。外科医生的技术手段中需要冠状动脉内膜切除术这种非血管桥血管重建技术。该技术并不理想,但目前的效果比术中经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术更好,比激光血管成形术好得多。这些方法可能有助于解决弥漫性冠状动脉问题,但应首先考虑序贯移植技术。