• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触路边清醒度检查站的方式是否会影响驾驶员对酒后驾车的认知?

Does the type of exposure to a roadside sobriety checkpoint influence driver perceptions regarding drunk driving?

作者信息

Beck Kenneth H, Moser Mary L

机构信息

Department of Public and Community Health, University of Maryland, 2366 Health and Human Performance Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Behav. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):268-77. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.3.268.

DOI:10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.3.268
PMID:16712441
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the type of exposure to roadside sobriety checkpoints is related to vulnerability of being stopped by the police for drinking and driving.

METHODS

Random household telephone surveys were conducted over 3 years.

RESULTS

Personally exposed drivers had lower perceptions of vulnerability than did drivers who knew a family member who had been stopped. Exposed drivers who also had a family member and an acquaintance that had been stopped had higher perceptions of vulnerability.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct exposure to a checkpoint appears to lower perceptions of risk than if one has had only indirect exposure (ie, family or friends).

摘要

目的

确定接触路边清醒检查站的类型是否与因酒驾被警察拦下的易感性有关。

方法

在3年时间里进行了随机的家庭电话调查。

结果

亲身接触过检查站的司机比那些认识有被拦下的家庭成员的司机对易感性的认知更低。那些自己亲身接触过检查站且有家庭成员和熟人也被拦下过的司机对易感性的认知更高。

结论

与仅有间接接触(即家人或朋友)相比,直接接触检查站似乎会降低对风险的认知。

相似文献

1
Does the type of exposure to a roadside sobriety checkpoint influence driver perceptions regarding drunk driving?接触路边清醒度检查站的方式是否会影响驾驶员对酒后驾车的认知?
Am J Health Behav. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):268-77. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.3.268.
2
Lessons learned from evaluating Maryland's anti-drunk driving campaign: assessing the evidence for cognitive, behavioral, and public health impact.评估马里兰州反酒驾运动的经验教训:评估认知、行为和公共卫生影响的证据
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Jul;10(3):370-7. doi: 10.1177/1524839906298520. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
3
Exposure to the sobriety "Checkpoint Strikeforce" campaign in Maryland: impact on driver perceptions of vulnerability and behavior.接触马里兰州的“清醒检查点打击力量”活动:对驾驶员脆弱性认知和行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2004 Jun;5(2):101-6. doi: 10.1080/15389580490434908.
4
A comparison of web-based and telephone surveys for assessing traffic safety concerns, beliefs, and behaviors.基于网络和电话调查评估交通安全关注、信念和行为的比较。
J Safety Res. 2009 Oct;40(5):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
5
The identification of alcohol intoxication by police.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Jun;25(6):850-5.
6
Concerns, dispositions and behaviors of aggressive drivers: what do self-identified aggressive drivers believe about traffic safety?攻击性驾驶者的担忧、性格和行为:自我认定的攻击性驾驶者对交通安全有何看法?
J Safety Res. 2006;37(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 May 2.
7
The efficacy of experimental interventions designed to reduce drinking among designated drivers.旨在减少代驾司机饮酒量的实验性干预措施的效果。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):261-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.261.
8
Car drivers' attitudes towards motorcyclists: a survey.汽车驾驶员对摩托车手的态度:一项调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 May;40(3):983-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
9
Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.过去十年间青少年撞车风险的进展。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
10
Who uses safe ride programs: an examination of the dynamics of individuals who use a safe ride program instead of driving home while drunk.谁会使用安全乘车计划:对那些使用安全乘车计划而非酒后驾车回家的个人动态的考察。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(2):305-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Avoiding DWI Among Bar-room Drinkers: Strategies and Predictors.避免酒吧饮酒者酒后驾车:策略与预测因素
Subst Abuse. 2010;4:35-51. doi: 10.4137/SART.S5414. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
2
Preventing impaired driving opportunities and problems.预防酒后驾车的机会和问题。
Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(2):225-35.