Blum Lauren S, Sharmin Tamanna, Ronsmans Carine
Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Reprod Health Matters. 2006 May;14(27):51-60. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27234-3.
In an effort to make skilled attendance at birth more accessible, some countries in Asia have begun major initiatives to promote the option of home delivery with a midwife. Yet there is little empirical evidence from the region to suggest that home-based care is as safe or effective as care in medical facilities. Qualitative research involving key informant and in-depth interviews and group discussions was carried out in 2003 and 2004 in Matlab, a rural area of Bangladesh, to examine the feasibility of home- vs. facility-based delivery from the perspective of 13 skilled birth attendants. The findings illuminate major constraints encountered during home deliveries, including poor transportation, inappropriate environment for delivery, insufficient supplies and equipment, lack of security, and inadequate training and medical supervision, which may prevent the provision of skilled care. Most difficult was the pressure by families to adhere to traditional childbirth norms and convincing families to accept the need for referral. The advantages highlighted of attending births in a health facility were the safe, clean environment, availability of supplies, ability to accommodate other work activities and make quick referrals, and higher coverage. The study illuminates practical, cultural and medical issues that need to be taken into consideration when choosing between home- and facility-based strategies and designing safe motherhood interventions.
为了使熟练的接生服务更容易获得,亚洲一些国家已开始采取重大举措,推广由助产士在家中接生的选择。然而,该地区几乎没有实证证据表明家庭护理与医疗机构护理一样安全或有效。2003年和2004年,在孟加拉国农村地区马特莱布,对13名熟练接生员进行了关键信息提供者访谈、深度访谈和小组讨论等定性研究,以从他们的角度考察在家分娩与在医疗机构分娩的可行性。研究结果揭示了在家分娩过程中遇到的主要制约因素,包括交通不便、分娩环境不合适、用品和设备不足、缺乏安全保障以及培训和医疗监督不够,这些因素可能会妨碍提供熟练的护理服务。最困难的是家庭坚持传统分娩规范的压力,以及说服家庭接受转诊的必要性。在医疗机构接生的突出优势包括安全、清洁的环境、用品供应、能够兼顾其他工作活动并迅速转诊以及覆盖率更高。该研究阐明了在选择家庭分娩和医疗机构分娩策略以及设计安全孕产干预措施时需要考虑的实际、文化和医学问题。