• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国急诊护理从业者角色的演变:经验与影响

The evolution of the emergency care practitioner role in England: experiences and impact.

作者信息

Mason S, Coleman P, O'Keeffe C, Ratcliffe J, Nicholl J

机构信息

Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2006 Jun;23(6):435-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.027300.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2005.027300
PMID:16714501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2564336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergency care practitioner (ECP) is a generic practitioner who combines extended nursing and paramedic skills. The "new" role emerged out of changing workforce initiatives intended to improve staff career opportunities in the National Health Service and ensure that patients' health needs are assessed appropriately.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of ECP Schemes in 17 sites, identify criteria contributing to a successful operational framework, analyse routinely collected data and provide a preliminary estimate of costs.

METHODS

There were three methods used: (a) a quantitative survey, comprising a questionnaire to project leaders in 17 sites, and analysis of data collected routinely; (b) qualitative interpretation based on telephone interviews in six sites; and (c) an economic costing study.

RESULTS

Of 17 sites, 14 (82.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Most ECPs (77.4%) had trained as paramedics. Skills and competencies have been extended through educational programmes, training, and assessment. Routine data indicate that 54% of patient contacts with the ECP service did not require a referral to another health professional or use of emergency transport. In a subset of six sites, factors contributing to a successful operational framework were strategic visions crossing traditional organisational boundaries and appropriately skilled workforce integrating flexibly with existing services. Issues across all schemes were patient safety, appropriate clinical governance, and supervision and workforce issues. On the data available, the mean cost per ECP patient contact is 24.00 pounds sterling, which is less than an ED contact of 55.00 pounds sterling.

CONCLUSION

Indications are that the ECP schemes are moving forward in line with original objectives and could be having a significant impact on the emergency services workload.

摘要

背景

急诊护理从业者(ECP)是一种融合了扩展护理和护理人员技能的全科从业者。这一“新”角色源自不断变化的劳动力计划,旨在改善国民医疗服务体系中员工的职业机会,并确保患者的健康需求得到适当评估。

目的

描述17个地点的ECP计划的发展情况,确定有助于成功运营框架的标准,分析常规收集的数据,并提供成本的初步估计。

方法

使用了三种方法:(a)定量调查,包括向17个地点的项目负责人发放问卷,并分析常规收集的数据;(b)基于对六个地点的电话访谈进行定性解读;(c)经济成本研究。

结果

17个地点中有14个(82.5%)回复了问卷。大多数ECP(77.4%)接受过护理人员培训。技能和能力通过教育计划、培训和评估得到了扩展。常规数据表明,与ECP服务接触的患者中,54%不需要转诊至其他医疗专业人员或使用紧急运输。在六个地点的子集中,促成成功运营框架的因素包括跨越传统组织界限的战略愿景以及技能适当的劳动力与现有服务的灵活整合。所有计划中存在的问题包括患者安全、适当的临床治理以及监督和劳动力问题。根据现有数据,每次ECP患者接触的平均成本为24.00英镑,低于急诊部门接触的55.00英镑。

结论

有迹象表明,ECP计划正在按照原定目标推进,可能会对急诊服务工作量产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
The evolution of the emergency care practitioner role in England: experiences and impact.英国急诊护理从业者角色的演变:经验与影响
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jun;23(6):435-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.027300.
2
Effectiveness of emergency care practitioners working within existing emergency service models of care.在现有急诊服务护理模式下工作的急诊护理从业者的有效性。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):239-43. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.035782.
3
The emerging role of the emergency care practitioner.急诊护理从业者的新角色。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):614-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011247.
4
Patient experiences of an extended role in healthcare: comparing emergency care practitioners (ECPs) with usual providers in different emergency and urgent care settings.患者在医疗保健中扮演扩展角色的体验:在不同的急诊和紧急护理环境中,将急诊护理从业者(ECP)与常规提供者进行比较。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Aug;31(8):673-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202415. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
New and emerging roles in out of hospital emergency care: a review of the international literature.院外急救中的新角色与新兴角色:国际文献综述
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Apr;17(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.11.004.
6
Collaborative practices in unscheduled emergency care: role and impact of the emergency care practitioner--qualitative and summative findings.
Emerg Med J. 2007 Sep;24(9):625-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.043943.
7
Nurses and paramedics in partnership: perceptions of a new response to low-priority ambulance calls.护士与护理人员合作:对低优先级救护车呼叫新应对方式的看法。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Oct;15(4):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
8
Caring for older people in prehospital emergency care: can nurses make a difference?院前急救护理中对老年人的照护:护士能发挥作用吗?
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01222.x.
9
Identification of the development needs for the emergency care nursing workforce.确定急诊护理人员的发展需求。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2008 Jan;16(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2007.10.001.
10
Paramedics' perceptions of their role in providing pre-hospital thrombolytic treatment: qualitative study.护理人员对其在提供院前溶栓治疗中角色的认知:定性研究
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Oct;14(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Community paramedicine: cost-benefit analysis and safety evaluation in paramedical emergency services in rural areas - a scoping review.社区急救医学:农村地区辅助医疗急救服务的成本效益分析和安全性评估——范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e057752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057752.
2
Future-proofing the primary care workforce: A qualitative study of home visits by emergency care practitioners in the UK.为初级保健劳动力提供未来保障:英国急诊医师家访的定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec;27(1):68-76. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1909565.
3
Advanced paramedics and nurses can deliver safe and effective pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency care: An integrative review.高级护理人员和护士能够提供安全有效的院前和院内急救护理:系统综述。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2385-2405. doi: 10.1002/nop2.866. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Community paramedicine-cost-benefit analysis and safety with paramedical emergency services in rural areas: scoping review protocol.社区 paramedicine——农村地区辅助医疗急救服务的成本效益分析与安全性:范围审查方案。 (注:“paramedicine”可能是一个特定专业术语,结合语境推测这里可理解为辅助医疗相关内容,但确切意思可能因专业领域不同而有差异)
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e038651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038651.
5
Harnessing inter-disciplinary collaboration to improve emergency care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): results of research prioritisation setting exercise.利用跨学科合作提高中低收入国家(LMICs)的紧急护理水平:研究重点设定工作的结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00362-7.
6
Contribution of paramedics in primary and urgent care: a systematic review.急救人员在初级和紧急医疗保健中的作用:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 May 28;70(695):e421-e426. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709877. Print 2020 Jun.
7
Community paramedicine model of care: an observational, ethnographic case study.社区护理的急救医疗模式:一项观察性的人种学案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 2;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1282-0.
8
Evidence-based paramedic models of care to reduce unnecessary emergency department attendance--feasibility and safety.循证急救护理模式以减少不必要的急诊就诊——可行性和安全性。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 15;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-13.
9
Generic qualitative research: a design for qualitative research in emergency care?一般定性研究:急诊护理定性研究的一种设计?
Emerg Med J. 2007 Dec;24(12):816-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.050641.
10
Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trial.护理人员处理社区中老年人拨打的999急救电话的有效性:整群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 3;335(7626):919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55. Epub 2007 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a community paramedic practitioner intermediate care support scheme for older people with minor conditions.为患有轻微疾病的老年人制定社区护理从业者中级护理支持计划。
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):196-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.196.
2
Can paramedics accurately identify patients who do not require emergency department care?护理人员能否准确识别出不需要去急诊科治疗的患者?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):387-90. doi: 10.1080/10903120290937987.
3
Can paramedics safely decide which patients do not need ambulance transport or emergency department care?护理人员能否安全地决定哪些患者不需要救护车转运或急诊科护理?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):383-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120290937978.
4
Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.对从事初级保健工作的执业护士是否能提供与医生同等护理的系统评价。
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):819-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819.
5
Evaluation of protocols allowing emergency medical technicians to determine need for treatment and transport.对允许急救医疗技术人员确定治疗和转运需求的方案进行评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):663-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02041.x.
6
Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?基层医疗和基于社区的急诊模式能否替代医院的 Accident and Emergency(A&E)(急诊)科室?
Health Policy. 1998 Jun;44(3):191-214. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00021-9.