• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士与护理人员合作:对低优先级救护车呼叫新应对方式的看法。

Nurses and paramedics in partnership: perceptions of a new response to low-priority ambulance calls.

作者信息

Machen Ina, Dickinson Angela, Williams Julia, Widiatmoko Dono, Kendall Sally

机构信息

Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Oct;15(4):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.aaen.2007.09.001
PMID:17993276
Abstract

AIMS

To explore patients' and staffs' perceptions of a pilot service which dispatched a nurse and paramedic to low-priority ambulance calls. However,

METHODS

Patients' opinions of both pilot and standard service groups were obtained through qualitative questionnaire data and individual interviews. Staffs' perceptions were explored via two focus groups. Questionnaires were sent to a convenience sample of 128 patients attended by the pilot service and 128 patients receiving the standard service. Initially 19 questionnaire participants agreed to be interviewed. Focus group participants (n=11) included nurses and paramedics involved in the pilot service.

RESULTS

Sixty-four questionnaires were returned and 11 interviews were conducted. Patients receiving the pilot service were enthusiastic about opportunities for care to be provided in their home. Involvement in the pilot service was a positive experience for staff. They felt confident in managing calls effectively because of their combined knowledge and skills, and believed that the quality of patient care had been improved. They also experienced increased job satisfaction and skills development.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and staff expressed positive views about the pilot service. Patients appreciated being treated at home and staff believed that working together provided more appropriate care for patients and enhanced interprofessional development.

摘要

目的

探讨患者和工作人员对一项试点服务的看法,该服务派遣护士和护理人员去处理低优先级的救护车呼叫。然而,

方法

通过定性问卷调查数据和个人访谈获得患者对试点服务组和标准服务组的意见。通过两个焦点小组探讨工作人员的看法。向由试点服务接诊的128名患者和接受标准服务的128名患者的便利样本发放问卷。最初,19名问卷参与者同意接受访谈。焦点小组参与者(n = 11)包括参与试点服务的护士和护理人员。

结果

共收回64份问卷,并进行了11次访谈。接受试点服务的患者对在家中获得护理的机会充满热情。参与试点服务对工作人员来说是一次积极的经历。由于他们的综合知识和技能,他们对有效处理呼叫充满信心,并认为患者护理质量得到了提高。他们还体验到工作满意度和技能发展的提升。

结论

患者和工作人员对试点服务均表达了积极看法。患者赞赏在家中接受治疗,工作人员认为共同工作为患者提供了更合适的护理,并促进了跨专业发展。

相似文献

1
Nurses and paramedics in partnership: perceptions of a new response to low-priority ambulance calls.护士与护理人员合作:对低优先级救护车呼叫新应对方式的看法。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Oct;15(4):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
2
Caring for older people in prehospital emergency care: can nurses make a difference?院前急救护理中对老年人的照护:护士能发挥作用吗?
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01222.x.
3
Patient handover: time for a change?患者交接:是时候做出改变了吗?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Jul;15(3):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
4
Experiences of adding nurses to increase medical competence at an emergency medical dispatch centre.在紧急医疗调度中心增加护士以提高医疗能力的经验。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Oct;14(4):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
5
Paramedics' perceptions of their role in providing pre-hospital thrombolytic treatment: qualitative study.护理人员对其在提供院前溶栓治疗中角色的认知:定性研究
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Oct;14(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
6
Home delivery. Interview by Barbara Millar.送货上门。芭芭拉·米勒访谈。
Nurs Stand. 2007;21(28):22-3.
7
Immigrants in emergency care: Swedish health care staff's experiences.急诊护理中的移民:瑞典医护人员的经历
Int Nurs Rev. 2005 Dec;52(4):276-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2005.00418.x.
8
Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement.患者对急诊科护理质量的认知以及质量改进领域的确定。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1045-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x.
9
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
10
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the psychological distress and mental well-being of pre-hospital care providers in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间沙特阿拉伯院前护理人员心理困扰与心理健康状况评估
Br Paramed J. 2023 Jun 1;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2023.6.8.1.1.
2
Supporting the ambulance service to safely convey fewer patients to hospital by developing a risk prediction tool: Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Suspected Seizure (RADOSS)-protocol for the mixed-methods observational RADOSS project.开发风险预测工具,支持救护车服务安全地将更少的患者送往医院:疑似癫痫发作后不良结局风险(RADOSS)-混合方法观察性 RADOSS 项目方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e069156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069156.
3
Designing and Governing Responsive Local Care Systems - Insights from a Scoping Review of Paramedics in Integrated Models of Care.
设计和管理响应式地方护理系统——综合护理模式中护理人员范围审查的见解
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Apr 13;22(2):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6418. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
4
Mental health, well-being and support interventions for UK ambulance services staff: an evidence map, 2000 to 2020.英国救护车服务人员的心理健康、幸福感及支持干预措施:2000年至2020年的证据图谱
Br Paramed J. 2021 Mar 1;5(4):25-39. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.3.5.4.25.
5
Improving emergency department transfer for patients arriving by ambulance: A retrospective observational study.改善通过救护车送达的患者在急诊科的转科:一项回顾性观察研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Apr;32(2):271-280. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13407. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Patient Satisfaction with Pre-Hospital Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study Comparing Professionals' and Patients' Views.患者对院前急救服务的满意度。一项比较专业人员和患者观点的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 30;15(2):233. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020233.
7
Emergency Medical Services Professionals' Attitudes About Community Paramedic Programs.紧急医疗服务专业人员对社区护理人员项目的态度。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):630-639. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.32591. Epub 2017 May 1.
8
Identifying Frequent Users of an Urban Emergency Medical Service Using Descriptive Statistics and Regression Analyses.使用描述性统计和回归分析识别城市紧急医疗服务的频繁使用者。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):39-45. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.28508. Epub 2016 Jan 12.