Erturk Sukru Mehmet, Mortelé Koenraad J, Binkert Christoph A, Glickman Jonathan N, Oliva Maria-Raquel, Ros Pablo R, Silverman Stuart G
Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Radiology Ste., c/o One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont St., Boston, MA 02120, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1497-501. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0539.
We conducted this study to evaluate whether CT scans could be used to differentiate hepatic venoocclusive disease from hepatic graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
We retrospectively evaluated 18 patients (eight women, 10 men; mean age, 42.4 years) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with biopsy-proven hepatic venoocclusive disease (n = 5), hepatic graft-versus-host disease (n = 6), or both (n = 7). Two radiologists reviewed abdominal and pelvic CT scans for hepatomegaly (> 18 cm), splenomegaly (> 13 cm), size of main portal and right hepatic veins, presence of periportal edema, gallbladder wall edema, hydropic gallbladder, ascites, and small-bowel wall thickening. CT and histopathology findings were correlated using analysis of variance and Fisher-Free-man-Holton tests.
Ascites and periportal edema were present in all five patients with venoocclusive disease, but of six patients with graft-versus-host disease, ascites was seen in two (p < 0.05) and periportal edema in only one (p < 0.05). Small-bowel wall thickening was encountered in five patients with graft-versus-host disease and in none with venoocclusive disease (p < 0.05). The right hepatic vein diameter in patients with venoocclusive disease (mean, 0.27 cm) was significantly smaller than the right hepatic vein diameter in patients with graft-versus-host disease (mean, 0.87 cm; p < 0.05).
In patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CT findings of periportal edema, ascites, and a narrow right hepatic vein suggest venoocclusive disease rather than graft-versus-host disease. Small-bowel wall thickening suggests graft-versus-host disease.
我们开展这项研究以评估在接受造血干细胞移植的患者中,CT扫描能否用于区分肝静脉闭塞病与肝移植物抗宿主病。
我们回顾性评估了18例造血干细胞移植后的患者(8例女性,10例男性;平均年龄42.4岁),这些患者经活检证实患有肝静脉闭塞病(n = 5)、肝移植物抗宿主病(n = 6)或两者皆有(n = 7)。两名放射科医生查看腹部和盆腔CT扫描,以检查肝肿大(> 18 cm)、脾肿大(> 13 cm)、门静脉主干和右肝静脉的大小、门周水肿、胆囊壁水肿、胆囊积水、腹水以及小肠壁增厚情况。使用方差分析和Fisher-Free-man-Holton检验对CT和组织病理学结果进行相关性分析。
所有5例患有静脉闭塞病的患者均出现腹水和门周水肿,但6例患有移植物抗宿主病的患者中,仅2例出现腹水(p < 0.05),仅1例出现门周水肿(p < 0.05)。5例患有移植物抗宿主病的患者出现小肠壁增厚,而患有静脉闭塞病的患者均未出现(p < 0.05)。静脉闭塞病患者的右肝静脉直径(平均0.27 cm)明显小于移植物抗宿主病患者的右肝静脉直径(平均0.87 cm;p < 0.05)。
在接受造血干细胞移植的患者中,CT表现为门周水肿、腹水以及右肝静脉狭窄提示为静脉闭塞病而非移植物抗宿主病。小肠壁增厚提示移植物抗宿主病。