Nyssen A-S, Blavier A
University of Liège, Cognitive Ergonomics, FAPSE, B32, 5 bld du Rectorat, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Ergonomics. 2006;49(5-6):517-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130600568766.
Although error has been shown as the main cause of accidents in complex systems, little attention has been paid to error detection. However, reducing the consequences of error depends largely on error detection. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the existing scientific knowledge on error detection, mostly based on studies conducted in laboratory or self reporting and to further knowledge through the analysis of a corpus of cases collected in a complex system, anaesthesia. By doing this, this paper is better able to describe how this knowledge can be used to improve understanding of error detection modes. An anaesthesia accident reporting system developed and organized at two Belgian University Hospitals was used in order to collect information about the error detection patterns. Results show that detection of errors principally occurred through the standard check (routine monitoring of the environment). Significant relationships were found between the type of error and the error detection mode, and between the type of error and the training level of the anaesthetist who committed the error.
尽管错误已被证明是复杂系统中事故的主要原因,但对错误检测的关注却很少。然而,减少错误的后果在很大程度上取决于错误检测。本文的目的是综合现有的关于错误检测的科学知识,这些知识大多基于在实验室进行的研究或自我报告,并通过分析在复杂系统——麻醉中收集的大量病例来进一步拓展知识。通过这样做,本文能够更好地描述如何利用这些知识来增进对错误检测模式的理解。为了收集有关错误检测模式的信息,使用了在两家比利时大学医院开发和组织的麻醉事故报告系统。结果表明,错误检测主要通过标准检查(对环境的常规监测)进行。在错误类型与错误检测模式之间,以及错误类型与犯错误的麻醉师的培训水平之间发现了显著的关系。