• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience.

作者信息

Chieffo Alaide, Morici Nuccia, Maisano Francesco, Bonizzoni Erminio, Cosgrave John, Montorfano Matteo, Airoldi Flavio, Carlino Mauro, Michev Iassen, Melzi Gloria, Sangiorgi Giuseppe, Alfieri Ottavio, Colombo Antonio

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Circulation. 2006 May 30;113(21):2542-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595694. Epub 2006 May 22.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595694
PMID:16717151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvements in results with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) may extend their use in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine patients with LMCA stenosis were treated with PCI and DES implantation (n=107) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=142), in a single center, between March 2002 and July 2004. A propensity analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the two cohorts. At 1 year, there was no statistical difference in the occurrence of death in PCI versus CABG both for the unadjusted (OR=0.291; 95% CI=0.054 to 1.085; P=0.0710) and adjusted analyses (OR=0.331; 95% CI=0.055 to 1.404; P=0.1673). PCI was correlated to a lower occurrence of the composite end points of death and myocardial infarction (unadjusted OR=0.235; 95% CI=0.048 to 0.580; P=0.0002; adjusted OR=0.260; 95% CI=0.078 to 0.597; P=0.0005) and death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events (unadjusted OR=0.300; 95% CI=0.102 to 0.617; P=0.0004; adjusted OR=0.385; 95% CI=0.180 to 0.819; P=0.01). No difference was detected in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event at the unadjusted (OR=0.675; 95% CI=0.371 to 1.189; P=0.1891) and adjusted analyses (OR=0.568; 95% CI=0.229 to 1.344; P=0.2266).

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year, in this single-center, retrospective experience, there was no difference in the degree of protection against death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and revascularization between PCI with DES and CABG for LMCA disease.

摘要

相似文献

1
Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience.
Circulation. 2006 May 30;113(21):2542-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595694. Epub 2006 May 22.
2
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局:ASAN-MAIN(ASAN 医疗中心-左主干血运重建)注册研究中裸金属支架 10 年和药物洗脱支架 5 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097.
3
Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians.八旬老人非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗中冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非随机对照比较
Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2374-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727099. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
4
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
5
5-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience.药物洗脱支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的 5 年结果:米兰经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.014.
6
Comparison of long-term (4-year) outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery narrowing treated with drug-eluting stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者的长期(4 年)结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;105(12):1728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.353.
7
Coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease (from a two-center registry).冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病(来自两个中心的注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 1;105(3):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.036.
8
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期临床结局:MAIN-COMPARE(无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄血运重建:经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与外科血运重建比较)注册研究分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.071.
10
Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry).冠状动脉成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的比较(博洛尼亚注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.070. Epub 2006 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Residual Right Coronary Artery Stenosis after Left Main Coronary Artery Intervention Increased the 30-Day Cardiovascular Death and 3-Year Right Coronary Artery Revascularization Rate.左主干冠状动脉介入治疗后残余右冠状动脉狭窄增加了 30 天心血管死亡和 3 年右冠状动脉血运重建率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jun 14;2020:4587414. doi: 10.1155/2020/4587414. eCollection 2020.
2
Prognosis of Percutaneous Intervention of a Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Without the Use of Intravascular Imaging.不使用血管内成像技术对左主干冠状动脉狭窄进行经皮介入治疗的预后
Cureus. 2018 Jun 22;10(6):e2857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2857.
3
[Angioplasty of the unprotected left main trunk: short and medium term outcomes].
[非保护左主干血管成形术:短期和中期结果]
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Apr 2;29:188. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.188.9640. eCollection 2018.
4
Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Data and Ongoing Trials.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——数据与正在进行的试验
Interv Cardiol. 2015 Sep;10(3):132-135. doi: 10.15420/ICR.2015.10.03.132.
5
Real World Application of Stenting of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience.无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄支架置入术的真实世界应用:单中心经验
Cardiol Res. 2012 Jun;3(3):100-108. doi: 10.4021/cr165w. Epub 2012 May 20.
6
Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的罪犯病变部位与预后:IABP-SHOCK II试验的一项子研究
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Dec;105(12):1030-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1017-6. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Stenting of left main coronary artery stenosis: A to Z.左主干冠状动脉狭窄的支架置入术:从A到Z
Heart Asia. 2013 Jan 25;5(1):18-27. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2012-010218. eCollection 2013.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——一家无现场心脏手术医院的经验
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015 Jul;31(4):267-79. doi: 10.6515/acs20150119d.
9
Very Long-term Outcomes and Predictors of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的极长期预后及预测因素
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Apr 5;129(7):763-70. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.178968.
10
Left main PCI: An observational analysis from large single-centre experience.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自大型单中心经验的观察性分析。
Indian Heart J. 2016 Jan-Feb;68(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Aug 29.