• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究效果与近端学习框架区域。

Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework.

作者信息

Kornell Nate, Metcalfe Janet

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):609-22. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609
PMID:16719670
Abstract

One of the most important reasons to investigate human metacognition is its role in directing how people study. However, limited evidence exists that metacognitively guided study benefits learning. Three experiments are presented that provide evidence for this link. In Experiment 1, participants' learning was enhanced when they were allowed to control what they studied. Experiments 2a-d replicated this finding and showed contributions of self-regulated study to learning. Experiments 3a and 3b showed that, when forced to choose among items they did not know, participants chose the easiest items and benefited from doing so, providing evidence for the link between metacognitive monitoring/control and learning, and supporting the region of proximal learning model of study-time allocation.

摘要

研究人类元认知的最重要原因之一是其在指导人们学习方式方面所起的作用。然而,关于元认知指导学习有益于学习的证据有限。本文呈现了三个实验,为这一联系提供了证据。在实验1中,当参与者能够控制所学内容时,他们的学习得到了增强。实验2a - d重复了这一发现,并显示了自我调节学习对学习的贡献。实验3a和3b表明,当参与者被迫在他们不了解的项目中进行选择时,他们会选择最简单的项目,并因此受益,这为元认知监测/控制与学习之间的联系提供了证据,并支持了学习时间分配的近端学习区域模型。

相似文献

1
Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework.研究效果与近端学习框架区域。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):609-22. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609.
2
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.元认知控制与策略选择:在学习中决定进行检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86. doi: 10.1037/a0017341.
3
Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.自然概念的测试增强学习:对识别记忆、分类和元认知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1441-51. doi: 10.1037/a0020636.
4
Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy.合理安排学习间隔:元认知控制策略的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):601-4. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.601.
5
Metacognitive control and the spacing effect.元认知控制和间隔效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):255-62. doi: 10.1037/a0017892.
6
Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence.
Memory. 1999 Jan;7(1):43-63. doi: 10.1080/741943716.
7
The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.学习动态以及向近端学习区域分配学习时间的情况。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):530-42. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530.
8
Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.修复元认知错觉:基于记忆与基于理论的程序比较
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):1133-45. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1133.
9
Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task.三岁的儿童能够利用自身记忆来指导视觉匹配任务中的反应。
Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):750-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00725.x.
10
Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred?对练习分布的元认知控制:何时更倾向于间隔练习?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1352-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016371.

引用本文的文献

1
Children Strategically Decide What to Practice.孩子们会策略性地决定练习什么。
Child Dev. 2025 Sep-Oct;96(5):1619-1631. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14268. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.适应性记忆中的负责记忆:元认知、遗忘、注意力及提取的作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
The Anchoring Effect in Study Time Allocation: Labor-in-Vain versus Labor-and-Gain.学习时间分配中的锚定效应:徒劳劳动与有得劳动
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;14(7):567. doi: 10.3390/bs14070567.
4
A Study Planning Exercise Associated with Decreased Distraction Levels among Introductory Biology Students.一项与减少入门生物学学生分心水平相关的研究计划练习。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Mar;23(1):ar3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-05-0092.
5
Structural Relationships between Learning Emotion and Knowledge Organization and Management Processes in Distance Learning Environments: "An Applied Study".远程学习环境中学习情感与知识组织及管理过程的结构关系:一项应用研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Aug 24;13(9):1569-1589. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090114.
6
HD-tDCS over the left DLPFC increases cued recall and subjective question familiarity rather than other aspects of memory and metamemory.左背外侧前额叶皮质的高密度经颅直流电刺激可增加提示性回忆和主观问题熟悉度,而不是记忆和元记忆的其他方面。
Brain Res. 2023 Nov 15;1819:148538. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148538. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
7
Blocked Presentation Leads Participants to Overutilize Domain Familiarity as a Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOLs).信息呈现受阻会导致参与者过度利用领域熟悉度作为学习判断(JOLs)的线索。
J Intell. 2023 Jul 17;11(7):142. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070142.
8
The Forward Effect of Delayed Judgments of Learning Is Influenced by Difficulty in Memory and Category Learning.学习判断延迟的前向效应受记忆难度和类别学习的影响。
J Intell. 2023 May 25;11(6):101. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060101.
9
The "curse of knowledge" when predicting others' knowledge.预测他人知识时的“知识诅咒”现象。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jul;51(5):1214-1234. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01382-3. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Strategic metacognition: Self-paced study time and responsible remembering.策略性元认知:自我调节的学习时间和负责任的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):234-251. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01307-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.