Suppr超能文献

胶体液液体管理对肾脏的影响:一项比较性综述

Renal impact of fluid management with colloids: a comparative review.

作者信息

Davidson I J

机构信息

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Division of Surgical Transplantation, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Sep;23(9):721-38. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000639. Epub 2006 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Colloids such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES), gelatin, dextran and albumin are useful for maintaining renal perfusion and function. The comparative renal effects of colloids have not been previously reviewed.

METHODS

Computer searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE bibliographic databases and the Cochrane Library were conducted using the search terms: colloids; hetastarch; gelatin; dextrans; serum albumin; kidney failure; cardiac surgical procedures; and kidney transplantation. Relevant studies were also sought through hand searching and examination of reference lists. Results of identified studies were qualitatively summarized with account taken for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

The three artificial colloids HES, gelatin and dextran all exhibited troublesome renal side-effects. Randomized trials have demonstrated adverse renal effects of HES in sepsis and surgery. Undesirable renal effects are common to all available HES solutions regardless of molecular weight, substitution or C2/C6 ratio. While some of its effects may be less severe than those of HES, gelatin also can adversely affect the kidney. A negative renal impact of dextran is well-established, although this colloid is now less extensively used than formerly. As the normal endogenous colloid, albumin exhibits a wide margin of renal safety, although albumin overdose needs to be avoided. Albumin also appears to exert protective effects on the kidney such as inhibition of apoptosis and scavenging of reactive oxygen species.

CONCLUSIONS

Colloids display important differences in their actions on the kidney. These contrasting renal effects should be considered in making fluid management decisions.

摘要

背景与目的

诸如羟乙基淀粉(HES)、明胶、右旋糖酐和白蛋白等胶体溶液有助于维持肾脏灌注和功能。此前尚未对胶体溶液的肾脏效应进行比较性综述。

方法

利用检索词“胶体溶液;羟乙基淀粉;明胶;右旋糖酐;血清白蛋白;肾衰竭;心脏外科手术;肾移植”对MEDLINE和EMBASE书目数据库以及Cochrane图书馆进行计算机检索。还通过手工检索和查阅参考文献列表来查找相关研究。对已识别研究的结果进行定性总结,并考虑潜在的混杂因素。

结果

三种人工胶体溶液HES、明胶和右旋糖酐均表现出不良的肾脏副作用。随机试验已证明HES在脓毒症和外科手术中会产生不良肾脏效应。所有市售的HES溶液,无论分子量、取代度或C2/C6比值如何,均存在不良肾脏效应。虽然明胶的某些效应可能不如HES严重,但它也会对肾脏产生不利影响。右旋糖酐对肾脏有负面作用,这一点已得到充分证实,不过这种胶体溶液如今的使用范围不如以前广泛。作为正常的内源性胶体,白蛋白具有广泛的肾脏安全性,尽管需要避免白蛋白过量。白蛋白似乎还对肾脏发挥保护作用,如抑制细胞凋亡和清除活性氧。

结论

胶体溶液在对肾脏的作用方面存在重要差异。在做出液体管理决策时应考虑这些截然不同的肾脏效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验