[Critical statement on selected recommendations of the new German S3 Sepsis Guideline].
作者信息
Edel Andreas, Reinhart Konrad, Schaller Stefan J
机构信息
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin (CVK/CCM), Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Deutschland.
出版信息
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Sep;115(6):505-507. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00720-0.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[Critical statement on selected recommendations of the new German S3 Sepsis Guideline].[关于德国新S3脓毒症指南部分推荐意见的批判性声明]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Sep;115(6):505-507. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00720-0.
2
[German S3 guideline sepsis: selected recommendations].[德国S3脓毒症指南：选定的建议]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 Apr;145(7):453-457. doi: 10.1055/a-0986-3637. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
4
[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].[脓毒症的诊断与治疗。德国脓毒症协会及德国重症与急诊医学跨学科协会指南]
Internist (Berl). 2006 Apr;47(4):356, 358-60, 362-8, passim. doi: 10.1007/s00108-006-1595-x.
5
[S3 guideline sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare : Summary of the strong recommendations].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及后续护理指南：强烈推荐内容总结]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Apr;115(3):178-188. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00671-6.
6
7
[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis].[脓毒症的诊断与治疗]
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Aug;95(8):429-54. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0414-7.
8
[Sepsis in neutropenia. Standard recommendations of the Work Group of Infections in Hematology and Oncology of the German Association for Hematology and Oncology].[中性粒细胞减少症中的脓毒症。德国血液学和肿瘤学协会血液学与肿瘤学感染工作组的标准建议]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 Apr 9;124 Suppl 1:S14-7.
9
Practice and perception--a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis.实践与认知——一项关于脓毒症治疗习惯的全国性调查
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2719-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3.
10
[Prevention and follow-up care of sepsis. 1st revision of S2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V., DSG) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, DIVI)].[脓毒症的预防与随访。德国脓毒症学会（Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V., DSG）和德国重症监护与急诊医学跨学科协会（Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, DIVI）S2k指南第1版修订本]
Internist (Berl). 2010 Jul;51(7):925-32. doi: 10.1007/s00108-010-2663-9.
本文引用的文献
1
[S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及后续护理指南：长篇版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 May;115(Suppl 2):37-109. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00685-0.
2
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study.巴西快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分的预测准确性：一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):789-798. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.
3
A prospective validation of Sepsis-3 guidelines in acute hepatobiliary sepsis: qSOFA lacks sensitivity and SIRS criteria lacks specificity (Cohort Study).Sepsis-3 指南在急性肝胆脓毒症中的前瞻性验证：qSOFA 缺乏敏感性，SIRS 标准缺乏特异性（队列研究）。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Accuracy of qSOFA for the diagnosis of sepsis-3: a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study.qSOFA用于脓毒症-3诊断的准确性：一项基于人群队列研究的二次分析
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):2034-2042. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.90.
5
Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions.对 Sepsis-3 定义提出担忧。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jan 25;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0165-6. eCollection 2018.
6
Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身性炎症反应综合征标准对脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2018 Mar;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Sepsis 3 from the perspective of clinicians and quality improvement initiatives.从临床医生和质量改进举措的角度看脓毒症3。
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:315-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Zotero 插件