Ross J D C, Cronjé H S, Paszkowski T, Rakoczi I, Vildaite D, Kureishi A, Alefelder M, Arvis P, Reimnitz P
Whittall Street Clinic, Whittall Street, Birmingham B4 6DH, UK.
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Dec;82(6):446-51. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019109. Epub 2006 May 24.
This multinational, multicentre, prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, non-inferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin monotherapy with ofloxacin plus metronidazole in women with uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease.
Women from hospitals throughout 13 countries received a 14 day course of either oral moxifloxacin, 400 mg once daily (n = 384), or oral ofloxacin, 400 mg twice daily plus oral metronidazole, 500 mg twice daily (n = 365).
Of the 741 patients in the intent to treat (ITT) population, 564 (74.2%) were valid for the per protocol (PP) analyses; 112 (19.9%) of these were included in the microbiologically valid population (MBV). Clinical resolution rates in the PP population at the test of cure visit (TOC, 5-24 days post-therapy, primary efficacy end point) were 90.2% (248/275) for moxifloxacin and 90.7% (262/289) for ofloxacin plus metronidazole (95% CI: -5.7% to 4.0%). At follow up (28-42 days post-therapy), resolution rates in the PP population were 85.8% (236/275) and 87.9% (254/289) for moxifloxacin and comparator, respectively (95% CI: -8.0% to 3.1%). Bacteriological success rates in the MBV population at TOC were 87.5% (49/56) for moxifloxacin and 82.1% (46/56) for comparator (95% CI: -8.3% to 18.8%). Against Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, bacteriological success rates with moxifloxacin were 88.5% (23/26) and 100% (13/13) and for comparator 85.7% (18/21) and 81.8% (18/22), respectively. Drug related adverse events occurred less frequently with moxifloxacin (22.5% (85/378)) versus the comparator (30.9% (112/363)) (p = 0.01).
In uncomplicated PID, once daily moxifloxacin monotherapy was clinically and bacteriologically as efficacious as twice daily ofloxacin plus metronidazole therapy and was associated with fewer drug related adverse events.
本项多国、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组、非劣效性研究比较了莫西沙星单药治疗与氧氟沙星加甲硝唑治疗单纯性盆腔炎女性的疗效和安全性。
来自13个国家医院的女性接受了为期14天的治疗,其中一组口服莫西沙星,400mg每日一次(n = 384),另一组口服氧氟沙星,400mg每日两次加口服甲硝唑,500mg每日两次(n = 365)。
在意向性治疗(ITT)人群的741例患者中,564例(74.2%)符合符合方案(PP)分析要求;其中112例(19.9%)纳入微生物学有效人群(MBV)。在治愈试验访视(TOC,治疗后5 - 24天,主要疗效终点)时,PP人群中莫西沙星的临床治愈率为90.2%(248/275),氧氟沙星加甲硝唑为90.7%(262/289)(95%CI:-5.7%至4.0%)。在随访时(治疗后28 - 42天),PP人群中莫西沙星和对照药物的治愈率分别为85.8%(236/275)和87.9%(254/289)(95%CI:-8.0%至3.1%)。在TOC时,MBV人群中莫西沙星的细菌学成功率为87.5%(49/56),对照药物为82.1%(46/56)(95%CI:-8.3%至18.8%)。针对沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌,莫西沙星的细菌学成功率分别为88.5%(23/26)和100%(13/13),对照药物分别为85.7%(18/21)和81.8%(18/22)。莫西沙星相关药物不良事件的发生频率低于对照药物(22.5%(85/378)对30.9%(112/363))(p = 0.01)。
在单纯性盆腔炎中,每日一次的莫西沙星单药治疗在临床和细菌学方面与每日两次的氧氟沙星加甲硝唑治疗同样有效,且药物相关不良事件较少。