• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MSX1与伴或不伴牙齿缺失的口面部裂隙

MSX1 and orofacial clefting with and without tooth agenesis.

作者信息

Modesto A, Moreno L M, Krahn K, King S, Lidral A C

机构信息

Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 2006 Jun;85(6):542-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500612.

DOI:10.1177/154405910608500612
PMID:16723652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2241923/
Abstract

MSX1 has been considered a strong candidate for orofacial clefting, based on mouse expression studies and knockout models, as well as association and linkage studies in humans. MSX1 mutations are also causal for hereditary tooth agenesis. We tested the hypothesis that individuals with orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis have MSX1 coding mutations by screening 33 individuals with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and 19 individuals with both orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis. Although no MSX1 coding mutations were identified, the known 101C > G variant occurred more often in subjects with both CL/P and tooth agenesis (p = 0.0008), while the *6C-T variant was found more often in CL/P subjects (p = 0.001). Coding mutations in MSX1 are not the cause of orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis in this study population. However, the significant association of MSX1 with both phenotypes implies that MSX1 regulatory elements may be mutated.

摘要

基于小鼠表达研究、基因敲除模型以及人类的关联和连锁研究,MSX1被认为是口面裂的一个强有力的候选基因。MSX1突变也是遗传性牙齿缺失的病因。我们通过筛查33例唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(CL/P)患者以及19例既有口面裂又有牙齿缺失的患者,来检验以下假设:患有或不患有牙齿缺失的口面裂患者存在MSX1编码突变。尽管未鉴定出MSX1编码突变,但已知的101C>G变异在既有CL/P又有牙齿缺失的受试者中出现得更频繁(p = 0.0008),而*6C-T变异在CL/P受试者中更常见(p = 0.001)。在本研究人群中,MSX1的编码突变不是导致有或没有牙齿缺失的口面裂的原因。然而,MSX1与这两种表型的显著关联意味着MSX1调控元件可能发生了突变。

相似文献

1
MSX1 and orofacial clefting with and without tooth agenesis.MSX1与伴或不伴牙齿缺失的口面部裂隙
J Dent Res. 2006 Jun;85(6):542-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500612.
2
Mutation analysis of the MSX1 gene exons and intron in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate.非综合征性唇腭裂患者MSX1基因外显子和内含子的突变分析
Stomatologija. 2006;8(1):21-4.
3
MSX1 mutation is associated with orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis in humans.MSX1基因突变与人类口腔颌面部裂隙和牙齿发育不全有关。
Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):342-3. doi: 10.1038/74155.
4
Association between MSX1 rs12532 polymorphism with nonsyndromic unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and tooth agenesis.MSX1 rs12532 多态性与非综合征性单侧完全性唇腭裂和牙齿缺失的相关性。
Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Jan;109:104556. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104556. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
5
Associations between the risk of tooth agenesis and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of MSX1 and PAX9 genes in nonsyndromic cleft patients.非综合征型唇腭裂患者牙缺失风险与 MSX1 和 PAX9 基因单核苷酸多态性的相关性研究。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):1036-42. doi: 10.2319/020513-104.1. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Novel nonsense mutation in MSX1 causes tooth agenesis with cleft lip in a Chinese family.MSX1基因中的新型无义突变导致一个中国家系出现牙齿发育不全伴唇裂。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2012 Aug;120(4):278-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00965.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
7
MSX1 involved selective tooth agenesis and abnormal labial frenum, pedigree, and retrospective study.MSX1 涉及选择性牙齿缺失和唇系带异常、家系和回顾性研究。
Oral Dis. 2023 Nov;29(8):3168-3172. doi: 10.1111/odi.14459. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
Novel human mutation and CRISPR/Cas genome-edited mice reveal the importance of C-terminal domain of MSX1 in tooth and palate development.新型人类突变和 CRISPR/Cas 基因组编辑小鼠揭示了 MSX1 C 末端结构域在牙齿和腭发育中的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 5;6:38398. doi: 10.1038/srep38398.
9
Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.全基因组测序显示MSX1在非综合征性唇腭裂中发挥作用。
J Med Genet. 2003 Jun;40(6):399-407. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.6.399.
10
A novel MSX1 mutation in hypodontia.一种在牙发育不全中发现的新型MSX1突变。
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Aug 1;128A(4):401-3. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30181.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of rs8670 Polymorphism in the MSX1 Gene With Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate in Malay Population.MSX1基因中rs8670多态性与马来西亚人群非综合征性唇裂伴或不伴腭裂的关联。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68958. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68958. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Dental anomalies and their therapeutic implications: retrospective assessment of a frequent finding in patients with cleft lip and palate.牙齿异常及其治疗意义:唇腭裂患者常见表现的回顾性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02606-3.
3
Research algorithm for the detection of genetic patterns and phenotypic variety of non-syndromic dental agenesis.非综合征性牙齿缺失的遗传模式和表型多样性检测研究算法。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021 Jan-Mar;62(1):53-62. doi: 10.47162/RJME.62.1.05.
4
Non-syndromic Cleft Palate: An Overview on Human Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors.非综合征性腭裂:人类遗传和环境风险因素概述
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Oct 20;8:592271. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.592271. eCollection 2020.
5
Screening , and Mutations in 4 Iranian Families with Non-Syndromic Tooth Agenesis.4个伊朗非综合征性牙齿发育不全家庭的筛查及突变情况
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):236-240.
6
Two novel mutations in MSX1 causing oligodontia.两个导致少牙症的 MSX1 新突变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0227287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227287. eCollection 2020.
7
Third molar agenesis as a potential marker for craniofacial deformities.第三磨牙缺失作为颅面畸形的潜在标志物。
Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Apr;88:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
8
Tooth Abnormalities In Individuals With Unilateral Alveolar Clefts: A Comparison Between Sides Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.单侧牙槽嵴裂患者的牙齿异常:使用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行双侧比较
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):e1195-e1200. doi: 10.4317/jced.54043. eCollection 2017 Oct.
9
Reconstruction of Drug-induced Cleft Palate Using Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Rodents.利用大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞重建药物诱导的腭裂
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan-Jun;7(1):82-88. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_140_16.
10
Radiographic Study of the Prevalence and Distribution of Hypodontia Associated with Unilateral and Bilateral Clef Lip and Palate in a Hungarian Population.匈牙利人群中与单侧和双侧唇腭裂相关的缺牙症患病率及分布的影像学研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Oct 21;22:3868-3885. doi: 10.12659/msm.897957.

本文引用的文献

1
In a Vietnamese population, MSX1 variants contribute to cleft lip and palate.在越南人群中,MSX1基因变异与唇腭裂有关。
Genet Med. 2004 May-Jun;6(3):117-25. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000127275.52925.05.
2
MSX1, PAX9, and TGFA contribute to tooth agenesis in humans.MSX1、PAX9和TGFA与人类牙齿发育不全有关。
J Dent Res. 2004 Sep;83(9):723-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300913.
3
A novel MSX1 mutation in hypodontia.一种在牙发育不全中发现的新型MSX1突变。
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Aug 1;128A(4):401-3. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30181.
4
Genetic analysis of candidate loci in non-syndromic cleft lip families from Antioquia-Colombia and Ohio.对来自哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚和俄亥俄州的非综合征性唇裂家族中候选基因座的遗传分析。
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Mar 1;125A(2):135-44. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20425.
5
Targeted scan of fifteen regions for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate in Filipino families.对菲律宾家庭中15个区域进行非综合征性唇腭裂的靶向扫描。
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Feb 15;125A(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20424.
6
MSX1 gene is deleted in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome patients with oligodontia.在患有少牙畸形的沃尔夫-赫希霍恩综合征患者中,MSX1基因缺失。
J Dent Res. 2003 Dec;82(12):1013-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910308201215.
7
Family-based analysis of MSX1 haplotypes for association with oral clefts.基于家系的MSX1单倍型与口腔裂隙相关性分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;25(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10255.
8
Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.全基因组测序显示MSX1在非综合征性唇腭裂中发挥作用。
J Med Genet. 2003 Jun;40(6):399-407. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.6.399.
9
Genetic association studies of cleft lip and/or palate with hypodontia outside the cleft region.唇腭裂与腭裂区域外牙缺失的基因关联研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 May;40(3):274-9. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0274_gasocl_2.0.co_2.
10
Variants of developmental genes (TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1) and their associations with orofacial clefts: a case-parent triad analysis.发育基因(TGFA、TGFB3和MSX1)的变异及其与口腔颌面部裂隙的关联:病例-父母三联体分析
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;24(3):230-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10223.