Allen Terry
Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Bradford.
Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Apr;11(4):157-61. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.4.20836.
The impact of poor housing on health was recognized 150 years ago, and doing something about it was the first real public health initiative. Today, standards in much of the older housing stock continue to fall and, exacerbated by the current free market boom in fuel costs, many people cannot afford to heat or maintain their homes. In response to this crisis, there is an increasing amount of housing help available which would directly improve the health of patients but, apart from pockets of exemplary practice, most health practitioners seem to do little about it. Yet housing issues feature prominently in nurse training, as well as receiving increasing emphasis through the current national and regional fuel poverty initiatives. In exploring this paradox the author examines the mixed fortunes of an innovative project which tried to stimulate collaborative working between professions by providing a successful combined health and housing intervention. Drawing on his evaluation of this project over five years, he considers what some of the barriers to collaboration might be, how they arise and what needs to be done to overcome them.
150年前,人们就认识到住房条件差对健康的影响,而采取措施解决这一问题是首个真正意义上的公共卫生举措。如今,许多老旧住房的标准持续下降,再加上当前燃料成本因自由市场繁荣而上涨,许多人无力供暖或维护自家房屋。针对这一危机,有越来越多的住房援助可供利用,这些援助将直接改善患者的健康状况,但除了一些堪称典范的做法外,大多数医疗从业者似乎对此几乎无所作为。然而,住房问题在护士培训中占据显著地位,并且通过当前的国家和地区燃料贫困倡议,其受到的重视程度也在不断提高。在探究这一矛盾时,作者审视了一个创新项目的不同命运,该项目试图通过提供一项成功的健康与住房联合干预措施来促进各专业之间的合作。基于他对该项目五年的评估,他思考了合作可能存在的一些障碍、这些障碍是如何产生的以及需要做些什么来克服它们。