Feiz Leila, Irshad Muhammad, Pont-Lezica Rafael F, Canut Hervé, Jamet Elisabeth
Surfaces Cellulaires et Signalisation chez les Végétaux, UMR 5546 CNRS-Université Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III, Pôle de Biotechnologie végétale, 24, Chemin de Borde Rouge, BP 42617 Auzeville, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology, Agriculture and Biological Sciences Faculty, Montana State University-Bozeman, Bozeman, MT 59717-3150, USA.
Plant Methods. 2006 May 27;2:10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-2-10.
The ultimate goal of proteomic analysis of a cell compartment should be the exhaustive identification of resident proteins; excluding proteins from other cell compartments. Reaching such a goal closely depends on the reliability of the isolation procedure for the cell compartment of interest. Plant cell walls possess specific difficulties: (i) the lack of a surrounding membrane may result in the loss of cell wall proteins (CWP) during the isolation procedure, (ii) polysaccharide networks of cellulose, hemicelluloses and pectins form potential traps for contaminants such as intracellular proteins. Several reported procedures to isolate cell walls for proteomic analyses led to the isolation of a high proportion (more than 50%) of predicted intracellular proteins. Since isolated cell walls should hold secreted proteins, one can imagine alternative procedures to prepare cell walls containing a lower proportion of contaminant proteins.
The rationales of several published procedures to isolate cell walls for proteomics were analyzed, with regard to the bioinformatic-predicted subcellular localization of the identified proteins. Critical steps were revealed: (i) homogenization in low ionic strength acid buffer to retain CWP, (ii) purification through increasing density cushions, (iii) extensive washes with a low ionic strength acid buffer to retain CWP while removing as many cytosolic proteins as possible, and (iv) absence of detergents. A new procedure was developed to prepare cell walls from etiolated hypocotyls of Arabidopsis thaliana. After salt extraction, a high proportion of proteins predicted to be secreted was released (73%), belonging to the same functional classes as proteins identified using previously described protocols. Finally, removal of intracellular proteins was obtained using detergents, but their amount represented less than 3% in mass of the total protein extract, based on protein quantification.
The new cell wall preparation described in this paper gives the lowest proportion of proteins predicted to be intracellular when compared to available protocols. The application of its principles should lead to a more realistic view of the cell wall proteome, at least for the weakly bound CWP extractable by salts. In addition, it offers a clean cell wall preparation for subsequent extraction of strongly bound CWP.
对细胞区室进行蛋白质组学分析的最终目标应该是详尽鉴定其驻留蛋白,排除来自其他细胞区室的蛋白质。实现这一目标很大程度上取决于目标细胞区室分离程序的可靠性。植物细胞壁存在一些特殊困难:(i)缺乏周围膜可能导致在分离过程中细胞壁蛋白(CWP)的丢失,(ii)纤维素、半纤维素和果胶的多糖网络可能成为细胞内蛋白等污染物的潜在陷阱。一些报道的用于蛋白质组学分析的细胞壁分离程序导致分离出高比例(超过50%)的预测细胞内蛋白。由于分离出的细胞壁应含有分泌蛋白,人们可以设想替代程序来制备含有较低比例污染蛋白的细胞壁。
根据已鉴定蛋白质的生物信息学预测亚细胞定位,分析了几种已发表的用于蛋白质组学的细胞壁分离程序的原理。揭示了关键步骤:(i)在低离子强度酸性缓冲液中匀浆以保留CWP,(ii)通过增加密度垫层进行纯化,(iii)用低离子强度酸性缓冲液进行大量洗涤以保留CWP同时尽可能去除胞质蛋白,以及(iv)不使用去污剂。开发了一种从拟南芥黄化胚轴制备细胞壁的新程序。盐提取后,高比例(73%)预测为分泌型的蛋白质被释放,这些蛋白质与使用先前描述的方案鉴定的蛋白质属于相同的功能类别。最后,使用去污剂去除细胞内蛋白,但根据蛋白质定量,其含量在总蛋白提取物质量中占比不到3%。
与现有方案相比,本文描述的新细胞壁制备方法所得到的预测为细胞内的蛋白比例最低。应用其原理应能更真实地呈现细胞壁蛋白质组,至少对于可通过盐提取的弱结合CWP而言。此外,它为后续提取强结合CWP提供了纯净的细胞壁制剂。