• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从幼儿期到青年期准备、冲突监测和抑制功能的发展:一项Go/Nogo事件相关电位研究

The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.

作者信息

Jonkman Lisa M

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Dept. of Neurocognition, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064. Epub 2006 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064
PMID:16729977
Abstract

The present developmental study aimed to trace changes in response expectation, preparation, conflict monitoring and subsequent response inhibition from 6 years of age to adulthood. In two groups of children (6-7 and 9-10 years old) and young adults (19-23 years old), behavior and event-related brain activity (ERP) in a CPT-AX task was measured. Hits, false alarms, inattention and impulsivity scores and ERP measures of conflict monitoring and inhibition (Nogo-N2 and P3), cue-orientation and prestimulus target expectation (cue-P2 and P3) and response preparation (Contingent Negative Variation; CNV) were collected. Behavioral measures indicated that attention processes developed most strongly before age 10, whereas impulsive behavior only started to diminish after the age of 10. Nogo-N2 effects were largest and more widely distributed across fronto-parietal electrodes in 6-7-year olds and decreased linearly with age. Nogo-P3 effects showed an opposite pattern by being absent in the youngest children, starting to develop at age 9-10 and reaching maturity in young adulthood. These developmental behavioral and ERP results are supportive of links between Nogo-N2 and conflict monitoring and Nogo-P3 and response inhibition and suggest that both are liable to different developmental progress. Furthermore, enhanced cue-P3 activity in both 6-7 and 9-10-year olds was argued to reflect a higher level of Go-stimulus expectation, that might cause them to experience more conflict on subsequent Nogo-trials, when the 'not-expected' stimulus appears. On the other hand, young children's reduced preparatory CNV activity was interpreted as a sign of reduced response priming caused by yet immature fronto-parietal networks involved in motor regulation.

摘要

本发育研究旨在追踪从6岁到成年期,反应期望、准备、冲突监测以及随后的反应抑制方面的变化。对两组儿童(6 - 7岁和9 - 10岁)以及青年成年人(19 - 23岁),在连续性能测试- AX任务(CPT - AX任务)中测量其行为和事件相关脑活动(ERP)。收集命中、虚报、注意力不集中和冲动性得分,以及冲突监测和抑制的ERP指标(Nogo - N2和P3)、线索定向和刺激前目标期望(线索 - P2和P3)以及反应准备(关联性负变;CNV)。行为测量表明,注意力过程在10岁之前发育最为强烈,而冲动行为在10岁之后才开始减少。Nogo - N2效应在6 - 7岁儿童中最大,且在额顶叶电极上分布更广,并随年龄线性下降。Nogo - P3效应呈现相反模式,在最年幼的儿童中不存在,在9 - 10岁开始发展,并在青年成年期达到成熟。这些发育行为和ERP结果支持了Nogo - N2与冲突监测以及Nogo - P3与反应抑制之间的联系,并表明两者都有不同的发育进程。此外,6 - 7岁和9 - 10岁儿童中增强的线索 - P3活动被认为反映了更高水平的“执行”刺激期望,这可能导致他们在随后的“不执行”试验中,当“未预期”刺激出现时,体验到更多冲突。另一方面,幼儿准备性CNV活动的减少被解释为参与运动调节的额顶叶网络尚未成熟导致反应启动减少的迹象。

相似文献

1
The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.从幼儿期到青年期准备、冲突监测和抑制功能的发展:一项Go/Nogo事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064. Epub 2006 May 26.
2
Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.有和没有注意缺陷多动障碍症状的5至7岁儿童的反应抑制和注意力加工:一项事件相关电位研究
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;119(12):2738-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
3
An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.一项关于反应冲突处理的全生命周期电生理学研究:评估冲突监测、线索利用、反应预期和反应抑制的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3305-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
4
Source localization of the Nogo-N2: a developmental study.Nogo-N2的来源定位:一项发育研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 May;118(5):1069-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
5
Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.Go/NoGo任务与连续性能测试中事件相关电位的比较分析:反应抑制和持续注意力的电生理标记物分解
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 9;1104(1):114-28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
6
Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.Go/NoGo任务中的反应启动:N2既不反映抑制也不反映冲突。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;118(2):343-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.027. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
7
Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.预刺激加工对警示Go/NoGo范式中后续事件的影响:反应准备、执行与抑制
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):121-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
8
Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.任务复杂性对 Go/Nogo 任务中 ERP 成分的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.线索 Go/NoGo 任务中的冲突与抑制。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;122(12):2400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.Go/NoGo 任务中的序列效应:抑制和促进。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Potential Characteristics and Brain Network Dynamics in Patients with Acute Cerebellar Ischemic Stroke: Insights from P300 and Moving Dipoles.急性小脑缺血性卒中患者的认知潜能特征与脑网络动力学:来自P300和移动偶极子的见解
Cerebellum. 2025 Jul 4;24(5):121. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01872-5.
2
Movement-related cortical potentials underlying motor preparation and execution in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童运动准备和执行过程中与运动相关的皮层电位
Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Jun;174:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.03.045. Epub 2025 Apr 6.
3
Reduced recruitment of inhibitory control regions in very young children with ADHD during a modified Kiddie Continuous Performance Task: A fMRI study.
一项功能磁共振成像研究:在改良版儿童连续操作任务中,患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的幼儿抑制控制区域的激活减少。
Cortex. 2025 Apr;185:153-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.025. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Cognitive Control Moderates Associations Between Domains of Temperamental Reactivity and Preschoolers' Social Behaviors.认知控制调节气质反应领域与学龄前儿童社会行为之间的关联。
Dev Psychobiol. 2024 Nov;66(7):e22545. doi: 10.1002/dev.22545.
5
Altered electrophysiology mechanism related to inhibitory control in adults with insomnia.与失眠成年人抑制控制相关的电生理机制改变。
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 22;14:1271264. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1271264. eCollection 2023.
6
Cumulative trauma load and timing of trauma prior to military deployment differentially influences inhibitory control processing across deployment.在军事部署前,累积性创伤负荷和创伤时间的不同会对部署期间的抑制控制处理产生影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48505-7.
7
Changes in Behavior and Neural Dynamics across Adolescent Development.青少年发展过程中的行为和神经动力学变化。
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 13;43(50):8723-8732. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0462-23.2023.
8
Immature event-related alpha dynamics in children compared with the young adults during inhibition shown by day-night stroop task.与年轻人相比,儿童在昼夜Stroop任务所显示的抑制过程中不成熟的事件相关α动力学。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Sep 26;17:1218559. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1218559. eCollection 2023.
9
Neurodevelopmental vulnerability to psychosis: developmentally-based methods enable detection of early life inhibitory control deficits that predict psychotic-like experiences at the transition to adolescence.精神分裂症的神经发育脆弱性:基于发展的方法能够检测到早期生活抑制控制缺陷,这些缺陷可预测青春期过渡时出现类似精神病的体验。
Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7746-7755. doi: 10.1017/S003329172300171X. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
10
More Evidence That Ensemble Music Training Influences Children's Neurobehavioral Correlates of Auditory Executive Attention.更多证据表明合奏音乐训练会影响儿童听觉执行注意力的神经行为关联。
Brain Sci. 2023 May 11;13(5):783. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050783.