• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左氧氟沙星750毫克,疗程5天,用于治疗住院的低死亡风险Ⅲ/Ⅳ级社区获得性肺炎患者。

Levofloxacin 750-mg for 5 days for the treatment of hospitalized Fine Risk Class III/IV community-acquired pneumonia patients.

作者信息

Shorr Andrew F, Khashab Mohammed M, Xiang Jim X, Tennenberg Alan M, Kahn James B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Room 2A-38D, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St. NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2006 Dec;100(12):2129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.019
PMID:16730170
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin was recently shown to be comparable to 500-mg, 10-day levofloxacin in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial for mild-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This subgroup analysis attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of a short-course levofloxacin regimen with traditional levofloxacin dosing for PSI Class III/IV patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, subgroup analysis focused on Pneumonia Severity Index Class III and IV patients enrolled in the study. Measurements included clinical and microbiological success rates, adverse events, and symptom resolution by day 3 of therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 528 patients in the ITT population, 219 (41.5%) were categorized as PSI Class III/IV and included in this analysis. Among the clinically evaluable patients, 90.8% (69/76) of patients treated with the 750-mg regimen achieved clinical success, compared with 85.5% (71/83) treated with 500-mg levofloxacin (95% CI,-15.9 to 5.4). Eradication rates in the microbiologically evaluable population were comparable for the 750- and 500-mg regimens (88.9% vs 87.5%, respectively; 95% CI,-18.3 to 15.6). Both regimens were well tolerated and had comparable safety profiles. A greater proportion of patients in the 750-mg treatment group experienced resolution of fever (48.4% vs 34.0%; P=.046) and purulent sputum (48.4% vs 27.5%; P=.007) by day 3 of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin course achieved comparable clinical and microbiologic efficacy to the 500-mg, 10-day regimen. By day 3 of therapy, a greater proportion of patients in the 750-mg group had objective and subjective resolution of fever. Further research is needed to determine the economic significance of short-course levofloxacin therapy.

摘要

背景

在一项针对轻至重度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的随机、双盲、多中心临床试验中,最近显示750毫克、疗程5天的左氧氟沙星的疗效和安全性与500毫克、疗程10天的左氧氟沙星相当。这项亚组分析试图比较短疗程左氧氟沙星方案与传统左氧氟沙星给药方案对肺炎严重指数(PSI)III/IV级患者的安全性和疗效。

方法

这项回顾性亚组分析聚焦于研究中纳入的肺炎严重指数III级和IV级患者。测量指标包括临床和微生物学成功率、不良事件以及治疗第3天时症状的缓解情况。

结果

在意向性分析(ITT)人群的528例患者中,219例(41.5%)被归类为PSI III/IV级并纳入本分析。在可进行临床评估的患者中,接受750毫克方案治疗的患者有90.8%(69/76)取得临床成功,而接受500毫克左氧氟沙星治疗的患者为85.5%(71/83)(95%置信区间,-15.9至5.4)。在微生物学可评估人群中,750毫克和500毫克方案的根除率相当(分别为88.9%和87.5%;95%置信区间,-18.3至15.6)。两种方案耐受性均良好,且安全性特征相当。在治疗第3天时,750毫克治疗组中有更高比例的患者发热(48.4%对34.0%;P = 0.046)和脓性痰症状(48.4%对27.5%;P = 0.007)得到缓解。

结论

750毫克、疗程5天的左氧氟沙星疗程与500毫克、疗程10天的方案取得了相当的临床和微生物学疗效。在治疗第3天时,750毫克组中有更高比例的患者发热在客观和主观上均得到缓解。需要进一步研究以确定短疗程左氧氟沙星治疗的经济学意义。

相似文献

1
Levofloxacin 750-mg for 5 days for the treatment of hospitalized Fine Risk Class III/IV community-acquired pneumonia patients.左氧氟沙星750毫克,疗程5天,用于治疗住院的低死亡风险Ⅲ/Ⅳ级社区获得性肺炎患者。
Respir Med. 2006 Dec;100(12):2129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 26.
2
Efficacy of 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens.750毫克、疗程5天的左氧氟沙星治疗非典型病原体所致社区获得性肺炎的疗效
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Apr;20(4):555-63. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003304.
3
Clinical implications of 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.750毫克、为期5天的左氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的临床意义。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Sep;20(9):1473-81. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2556.
4
Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: the MOTIV study--a randomized clinical trial.莫西沙星单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者有效:MOTIV研究——一项随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1499-509. doi: 10.1086/587519.
5
Gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days versus 7 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study.吉米沙星每日一次,5天疗程与7天疗程治疗社区获得性肺炎的随机、多中心、双盲研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jul;60(1):112-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm119. Epub 2007 May 30.
6
Community-Acquired Pneumonia Recovery in the Elderly (CAPRIE): efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy.老年人社区获得性肺炎康复研究(CAPRIE):莫西沙星治疗与左氧氟沙星治疗的疗效及安全性比较
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42(1):73-81. doi: 10.1086/498520. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
7
A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay.美国住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的比较:以住院时间为重点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):895-906. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273408.
8
Safety and efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: results from a double-blind randomized phase 3 comparison study with levofloxacin.静脉注射替加环素治疗社区获得性肺炎的安全性和有效性:与左氧氟沙星的双盲随机3期对照研究结果
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jan;63(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
9
Pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the levofloxacin clinical trials experience.铜绿假单胞菌所致肺炎:左氧氟沙星的临床试验经验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):843-50. doi: 10.1185/030079906X100195.
10
Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis.门诊环境中接受左氧氟沙星或大环内酯类药物治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的治疗失败率、医疗保健利用情况及成本:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Several Treatments with Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较几种治疗方法与抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6410.
2
Comparison of high-dose, short-course levofloxacin treatment vs conventional regimen against acute bacterial infection: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.大剂量短疗程左氧氟沙星治疗与传统方案治疗急性细菌感染的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 May 17;12:1353-1361. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S193483. eCollection 2019.
3
A randomized, open, multicenter clinical study on the short course of intravenous infusion of 750 mg of levofloxacin and the sequential standard course of intravenous infusion/oral administration of 500 mg of levofloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
一项关于750毫克左氧氟沙星短程静脉输注与500毫克左氧氟沙星静脉输注/口服序贯标准疗程治疗社区获得性肺炎的随机、开放、多中心临床研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2473-2484. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.30.
4
Empiric antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: optimizing pathogen clearance.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的经验性抗菌治疗:优化病原体清除
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):493. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0493-6.
5
An alternate pathophysiologic paradigm of sepsis and septic shock: implications for optimizing antimicrobial therapy.脓毒症和感染性休克的另一种病理生理模式:优化抗菌治疗的意义。
Virulence. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):80-97. doi: 10.4161/viru.26913. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
6
Are fluoroquinolones superior antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia?氟喹诺酮类药物是否优于抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎?
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):317-29. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0251-y.
7
Dosing regimen matters: the importance of early intervention and rapid attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target.剂量方案很重要:早期干预和快速达到药代动力学/药效学目标的重要性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jun;56(6):2795-805. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05360-11. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
8
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy.左氧氟沙星用于社区获得性肺炎超过十年的累积临床经验:批判性评估及其在治疗中的作用
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:59-68. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S15599. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
9
A clinical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia: an observational cohort study.社区获得性肺炎的临床路径:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jul 6;11:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-188.
10
Fluoroquinolones in community-acquired pneumonia: guide to selection and appropriate use.氟喹诺酮类药物在社区获得性肺炎中的应用:选择和合理使用指南。
Drugs. 2011 Apr 16;71(6):757-70. doi: 10.2165/11585430-000000000-00000.