File Thomas M, Mandell Lionel A, Tillotson Glenn, Kostov Kosta, Georgiev Ognian
Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, OH and Summa Health System, 75 Arch Street, Suite 105, Akron, OH 44304, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jul;60(1):112-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm119. Epub 2007 May 30.
Short-course therapy has been advocated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared the efficacy and safety of 5 and 7 day courses of gemifloxacin for outpatient treatment of mild-moderate CAP.
In a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study, patients were randomized to receive 320 mg of oral gemifloxacin once daily for 5 or 7 days. Over 95% of all patients in each cohort had a Fine score of <or=III. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical cure at follow-up (days 24-30). Secondary outcomes were clinical and bacteriological responses at the end of therapy (days 7-9) and bacteriological and radiological responses at follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were also monitored.
In a total of 469 per protocol (PP) patients, clinical resolution at follow-up was 95% and 92% for 5 and 7 day treatments, respectively [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.48, 7.42], indicating non-inferiority of 5 day treatment. Clinical resolution at the end of therapy was 96% for both regimens (95% CI -3.85, 3.42). Bacteriological response rates in PP patients at the end of therapy were 94% and 96% for 5 and 7 day groups, respectively (95% CI -8.27, 3.25) and 91% for both groups at follow-up (95% CI -6.89, 7.93). Radiological success in PP patients at follow-up was 98% and 93% in 5 and 7 day groups, respectively (95% CI 0.35, 7.91). Pre-therapy pathogens were identified in 242 (47.3%) patients, most commonly Streptococcus pneumoniae. Frequency of treatment-related AEs was 21% in both cohorts with discontinuation rates of 1.2% and 2% in the 5 and 7 day groups, respectively. A lower incidence of rash was observed in the 5 day cohort (0.4%) versus the 7 day cohort (2.8%) (P=0.04).
Gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days is not inferior to 7 days in the PP population with respect to clinical, bacteriological and radiological efficacy. Further work is needed, however, to explore whether fewer treatment days would improve patient compliance and reduce the incidence of AEs.
短程治疗已被提倡用于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的治疗。我们比较了5天和7天疗程的吉米沙星门诊治疗轻中度CAP的疗效和安全性。
在一项多中心、双盲、平行组研究中,患者被随机分配接受每日一次320mg口服吉米沙星,疗程为5天或7天。每个队列中超过95%的患者Fine评分为≤III级。主要疗效终点为随访时(第24 - 30天)的临床治愈。次要结局为治疗结束时(第7 - 9天)的临床和细菌学反应以及随访时的细菌学和影像学反应。还监测了不良事件(AE)。
在总共469例符合方案(PP)的患者中,5天和7天治疗组随访时的临床缓解率分别为95%和92%[95%置信区间(CI)-1.48,7.42],表明5天治疗并不逊色。两种方案治疗结束时的临床缓解率均为96%(95%CI -3.85,3.42)。PP患者治疗结束时5天和7天组的细菌学反应率分别为94%和96%(95%CI -8.27,3.25),随访时两组均为91%(95%CI -6.89,7.93)。PP患者随访时5天和7天组的影像学成功率分别为98%和93%(95%CI 0.35,7.91)。242例(47.3%)患者在治疗前鉴定出病原体,最常见的是肺炎链球菌。两个队列中与治疗相关的AE发生率均为21%,5天和7天组的停药率分别为1.2%和2%。5天队列中皮疹的发生率(0.4%)低于7天队列(2.8%)(P = 0.04)。
在PP人群中,每日一次服用5天的吉米沙星在临床、细菌学和影像学疗效方面并不逊色于7天疗程。然而,还需要进一步研究以探讨缩短治疗天数是否会提高患者依从性并降低AE发生率。