Hurskainen Ritva
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Sairaalank 1, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Oct;20(5):681-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 30.
Menorrhagia is a common disorder that requires plenty of resources. Rapid developments in medical technology have resulted in new management strategies, which are true alternatives to hysterectomy. In many countries the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial destruction techniques are available for menorrhagia. Clinicians must answer questions about cost, effectiveness and quality of medical care when choosing the treatment option. This review integrates the results from the latest studies and review articles about LNG-IUS and endometrial destruction techniques by addressing the key clinical issues in menorrhagia. Both LNG-IUS and endometrial ablation seem to be good and effective alternative options to hysterectomy. Although these treatments have relatively high failure rates, the majority of women are satisfied and the cost-effectiveness of these treatments are better than that of hysterectomy. Both treatments have their advantages and disadvantages. Thus far LNG-IUS seems to be more cost-effective than endometrial resection or hysterectomy at 5 years follow-up. However, second generation ablation techniques may offer better cost-effectiveness than the first generation techniques, but the evidence is insufficient.
月经过多是一种常见疾病,需要大量资源。医学技术的快速发展带来了新的管理策略,这些策略是子宫切除术的真正替代方案。在许多国家,左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)和子宫内膜破坏技术可用于治疗月经过多。临床医生在选择治疗方案时必须回答有关医疗成本、有效性和质量的问题。本综述通过探讨月经过多的关键临床问题,整合了有关LNG-IUS和子宫内膜破坏技术的最新研究及综述文章的结果。LNG-IUS和子宫内膜消融术似乎都是子宫切除术的良好且有效的替代选择。尽管这些治疗方法的失败率相对较高,但大多数女性感到满意,且这些治疗方法的成本效益优于子宫切除术。两种治疗方法都有其优缺点。到目前为止,在5年随访中,LNG-IUS似乎比子宫内膜切除术或子宫切除术更具成本效益。然而,第二代消融技术可能比第一代技术提供更好的成本效益,但证据不足。