• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热球囊消融术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗特发性月经过多的随机对照试验

Randomised comparative trial of thermal balloon ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with idiopathic menorrhagia.

作者信息

Shaw Robert W, Symonds Ian M, Tamizian Onnig, Chaplain Julie, Mukhopadhyay Sambit

机构信息

Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;47(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00747.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00747.x
PMID:17627692
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness of thermal balloon ablation (TBA) and levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the management of idiopathic menorrhagia and changes in pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) scores in patients who had failed on oral medical treatment.

METHODS

Phase III, single-centre, open randomised controlled trial. Following full screening and evaluation of 104 women, 33 were randomised to TBA and 33 to LNG-IUS. Primary outcomes were changes in PBAC scores from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in haemoglobin and serum ferritin, at six months, continuation with treatment and hysterectomy rates at two years and changes in PBAC scores at three, six and nine months.

RESULTS

All patients randomised had a PBAC score of > or = 120. At all assessment times, median PBAC scores were less than baseline, the greatest reductions being seen at 12 months for both treatments. When the median PBAC for the LNG-IUS (26 (0-68)) was significantly different to the median PBAC for the TBA cohort (62 (0-142)) P < 0.001. Irregular bleeding problems were the most common reason for discontinuation of the LNG-IUS and resulted in more women (39.8%) seeking other treatment by two years than the TBA (23.1%) (P < 0.05) and more undergoing a hysterectomy (20.7% vs 13.3%, respectively) (p > 0.05). Patient acceptability of the LNG-IUS and TBA was similar at 12 and 24 months in terms of their perceived satisfaction of effect on menorrhagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TBA and LNG-IUS achieved significant decreases in PBAC scores, with those for the LNG-IUS being significantly greater at 12 months. However, prolonged days of bleeding resulted in fewer women continuing with the LNG-IUS at two years.

摘要

目的

比较热球囊消融术(TBA)和左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)治疗特发性月经过多的有效性,以及口服药物治疗失败患者的图像失血评估图(PBAC)评分变化。

方法

III期单中心开放随机对照试验。在对104名女性进行全面筛查和评估后,33名被随机分配至TBA组,33名被随机分配至LNG-IUS组。主要结局是从基线到12个月时PBAC评分的变化。次要结局是6个月时血红蛋白和血清铁蛋白的变化、两年时的持续治疗率和子宫切除率,以及3个月、6个月和9个月时PBAC评分的变化。

结果

所有随机分组的患者PBAC评分均≥120。在所有评估时间点,PBAC评分中位数均低于基线,两种治疗在12个月时下降幅度最大。LNG-IUS组的PBAC评分中位数为26(0 - 68),与TBA组的中位数62(0 - 142)有显著差异,P < 0.001。不规则出血问题是停用LNG-IUS最常见的原因,导致两年内寻求其他治疗的女性(39.8%)多于TBA组(23.1%)(P < 0.05),接受子宫切除术的女性也更多(分别为20.7%和13.3%)(P > 0.05)。就对月经过多的治疗效果满意度而言,LNG-IUS和TBA在12个月和24个月时的患者接受度相似。

结论

TBA和LNG-IUS均使PBAC评分显著降低,LNG-IUS在12个月时降低幅度更大。然而,出血天数延长导致两年内继续使用LNG-IUS的女性较少。

相似文献

1
Randomised comparative trial of thermal balloon ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with idiopathic menorrhagia.热球囊消融术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗特发性月经过多的随机对照试验
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;47(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00747.x.
2
A randomised trial comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.一项比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统和热球囊消融术治疗月经过多的随机试验。
BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):257-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00863.x.
3
Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and mefenamic acid for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia: a multiple analysis using total menstrual fluid loss, menstrual blood loss and pictorial blood loss assessment charts.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与甲芬那酸治疗特发性月经过多的随机对照试验:使用总月经液流失、月经失血和图像失血评估图的多分析
BJOG. 2005 Aug;112(8):1121-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00642.x.
4
A randomized prospective trial comparing the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system with thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.一项比较左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与热球囊消融治疗月经过多的随机前瞻性试验。
Contraception. 2010 Mar;81(3):226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
5
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub2.
6
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与热球囊消融治疗月经过多的成本效益分析。
BJOG. 2006 Jul;113(7):797-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00944.x.
8
Health status function after treatment with thermal balloon endometrial ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system for idiopathic menorrhagia: a randomized study.热球囊子宫内膜消融术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗特发性月经过多后的健康状况功能:一项随机研究。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(2):84-8. doi: 10.1159/000092660. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
9
The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on sexual functioning among women with menorrhagia: a 5-year randomised controlled trial.子宫切除术或左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对月经过多女性性功能的影响:一项为期5年的随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):563-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01306.x.
10
The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on lower abdominal pain and back pain among women treated for menorrhagia: a five-year randomized controlled trial.子宫切除术或左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对月经过多治疗后女性下腹疼痛和背痛的影响:一项为期五年的随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1389-96. doi: 10.3109/00016340903297150.

引用本文的文献

1
First and second-generation endometrial ablation devices: A network meta-analysis.第一代和第二代子宫内膜消融设备:网状荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 28;14(5):e065966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065966.
2
Variation of outcome reporting in studies of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review.月经过多干预研究中结果报告的差异:一项系统评价
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Sep;14(3):205-218. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.3.030.
3
Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial.
子宫内膜消融术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与单纯子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多妇女的多中心随机对照研究方案; MIRA2 试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6.
4
Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.干预重度月经过多;Cochrane 综述和网络荟萃分析概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 31;5(5):CD013180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013180.pub2.
5
Progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.含孕激素的宫内节育系统用于治疗月经过多。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;6(6):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub4.
6
Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review.在研究和临床实践中评估月经过多的图像方法:一项系统文献综述
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0887-y.
7
Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的子宫内膜切除术和消融技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 22;1(1):CD001501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub5.
8
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (52 mg) for Idiopathic Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Health Technology Assessment.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统(52毫克)用于特发性月经过多:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Nov 1;16(18):1-119. eCollection 2016.
9
The Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗月经过多的疗效
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0865-3. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.手术与药物治疗月经过多的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD003855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub3.