Shepherd John A, Lu Ying, Wilson Kevin, Fuerst Thomas, Genant Harry, Hangartner Thomas N, Wilson Charles, Hans Didier, Leib Edward S
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0946, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 May 12.
The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Committee on Standards of Bone Measurement (CSBM) consists of experts in technical aspects of bone densitometry. The CSBM recently reviewed the scientific literature on cross-calibration and precision assessment. A report with recommendations was presented at the 2005 ISCD Position Development Conference (PDC). Based on a thorough review of the data by the ISCD Expert Panel during the conference, the ISCD adopted Official Positions with respect to (1) cross-calibration when changing or replacing hardware; (2) the approach to cross-calibration when an entire system is changed to one made by either the same or a different manufacturer; (3) when no cross-calibration study or bone mineral density (BMD) comparison is done between facilities; and (4) the minimum acceptable precision for an individual technologist. We present here the ISCD Official Positions on these topics that were established as a result of the 2005 PDC, together with the associated rationales and supportive evidence.
国际临床骨密度测量学会(ISCD)骨测量标准委员会(CSBM)由骨密度测量技术方面的专家组成。CSBM最近回顾了关于交叉校准和精密度评估的科学文献。一份包含建议的报告在2005年ISCD立场发展会议(PDC)上提交。基于会议期间ISCD专家小组对数据的全面审查,ISCD就以下方面采用了官方立场:(1)更换或替换硬件时的交叉校准;(2)整个系统更换为同一制造商或不同制造商生产的系统时的交叉校准方法;(3)设施之间未进行交叉校准研究或骨矿物质密度(BMD)比较时的情况;(4)个体技术人员的最低可接受精密度。我们在此呈现因2005年PDC而确立的ISCD关于这些主题的官方立场,以及相关的理论依据和支持证据。