Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症诊断的骨骼部位:2005年国际临床骨密度学会官方立场

Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

作者信息

Hans Didier, Downs Robert W, Duboeuf François, Greenspan Susan, Jankowski Lawrence G, Kiebzak Gary M, Petak Steven M

机构信息

Nuaclear Medicine Division, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 May 12.

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions to assist healthcare providers in addressing some of the issues inherent with the use of bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to diagnose osteoporosis, apply World Health Organization (WHO) T-score classifications, and monitor BMD changes over time. Differences exist, however, between the ISCD Official Position statement and that of the International Osteoporosis Foundation with respect to WHO criteria for skeletal sites. Consequently, a subcommittee of the ISCD was directed to address the application of the WHO classifications to specific skeletal sites and regions of interest. In 2005, the ISCD Position Development Conference reviewed the findings and prepared Official Positions, which address whether or not: (1) the lowest T-score of the total proximal femur, femoral neck, trochanter, and spine should continue to be used for diagnosis; (2) the WHO classification may be applied to a single vertebral body T-score; and (3) the ISCD should endorse the use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database for proximal femur T-score derivation. The resulting ISCD Official Positions, with their corresponding rationales and evidence are provided here, as well as questions that will need to be addressed in the future.

摘要

国际临床骨密度测量学会(ISCD)制定了官方立场,以协助医疗保健提供者解决使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)评估骨矿物质密度(BMD)来诊断骨质疏松症、应用世界卫生组织(WHO)T值分类以及监测BMD随时间变化所固有的一些问题。然而,ISCD官方立场声明与国际骨质疏松基金会在WHO骨骼部位标准方面存在差异。因此,ISCD的一个小组委员会被要求解决WHO分类在特定骨骼部位和感兴趣区域的应用问题。2005年,ISCD立场制定会议审查了研究结果并制定了官方立场,内容涉及:(1)全近端股骨、股骨颈、大转子和脊柱的最低T值是否应继续用于诊断;(2)WHO分类是否可应用于单个椎体T值;(3)ISCD是否应认可使用国家健康和营养检查调查数据库来推导近端股骨T值。此处提供了由此产生的ISCD官方立场及其相应的原理和证据,以及未来需要解决的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验