• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与确诊的生殖道衣原体感染相关的严重生殖道并发症的发生率:乌普萨拉女性队列研究

Incidence of severe reproductive tract complications associated with diagnosed genital chlamydial infection: the Uppsala Women's Cohort Study.

作者信息

Low N, Egger M, Sterne J A C, Harbord R M, Ibrahim F, Lindblom B, Herrmann B

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, Bern, CH-3012, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Jun;82(3):212-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.017186.

DOI:10.1136/sti.2005.017186
PMID:16731670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2576723/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cumulative incidence of severe complications associated with genital chlamydia infection in the general female population.

METHODS

The Uppsala Women's Cohort Study was a retrospective population based cohort study in Sweden, linking laboratory, hospital, and population registers. We estimated the cumulative incidence of hospital diagnosed pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility, and used multivariable regression models to estimate hazard ratios according to screening status.

RESULTS

We analysed complete data from 43 715 women in Uppsala aged 15-24 years between January 1985 and December 1989. Follow up until the end of 1999 included 709 000 woman years and 3025 events. The cumulative incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease by age 35 years was 3.9% (95% CI 3.7% to 4.0%) overall: 5.6% (4.7% to 6.7%) in women who ever tested positive for chlamydia, 4.0% (3.7% to 4.4%) in those with negative tests, and 2.9% (2.7% to 3.2%) in those who were never screened. The corresponding figures were: for ectopic pregnancy, 2.3% (2.2% to 2.5%) overall, 2.7% (2.1% to 3.5%), 2.0% (1.8% to 2.3%), and 1.9% (1.7% to 2.1%); and for infertility, 4.1% (3.9% to 4.3%) overall, 6.7% (5.7% to 7.9%), 4.7% (4.4% to 5.1%), and 3.1% (2.8% to 3.3%). Low educational attainment was strongly associated with the development of all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of severe chlamydia associated complications estimated from ours, and other population based studies, was lower than expected. Studies that incorporate data about pelvic inflammatory disease diagnosed in primary care and behavioural risk factors would further improve our understanding of the natural history of chlamydia. Our results provide reassurance for patients, but mean that the benefits of chlamydia screening programmes might have been overestimated.

摘要

目的

评估普通女性人群中与生殖道衣原体感染相关的严重并发症的累积发病率。

方法

乌普萨拉女性队列研究是瑞典一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,将实验室、医院和人口登记数据相联系。我们估算了医院诊断的盆腔炎、异位妊娠和不孕症的累积发病率,并使用多变量回归模型根据筛查状态估算风险比。

结果

我们分析了1985年1月至1989年12月期间乌普萨拉43715名年龄在15 - 24岁女性的完整数据。随访至1999年底,共计709000人年,发生3025起事件。35岁时盆腔炎的总体累积发病率为3.9%(95%置信区间3.7%至4.0%):衣原体检测曾呈阳性的女性为5.6%(4.7%至6.7%),检测呈阴性的女性为4.0%(3.7%至4.4%),从未接受筛查的女性为2.9%(2.7%至3.2%)。异位妊娠的相应数据为:总体2.3%(2.2%至2.5%),衣原体检测曾呈阳性的女性为2.7%(2.1%至3.5%),检测呈阴性的女性为2.0%(1.8%至2.3%),从未接受筛查的女性为1.9%(1.7%至2.1%);不孕症的相应数据为:总体4.1%(3.9%至4.3%),衣原体检测曾呈阳性的女性为6.7%(5.7%至7.9%),检测呈阴性的女性为4.7%(4.4%至5.1%),从未接受筛查的女性为3.1%(2.8%至3.3%)。低教育程度与所有结局的发生密切相关。

结论

根据我们的研究以及其他基于人群的研究估算的衣原体相关严重并发症的发病率低于预期。纳入初级保健中诊断的盆腔炎数据和行为风险因素的研究将进一步增进我们对衣原体自然史的理解。我们的结果为患者提供了安心的依据,但意味着衣原体筛查项目的益处可能被高估了。

相似文献

1
Incidence of severe reproductive tract complications associated with diagnosed genital chlamydial infection: the Uppsala Women's Cohort Study.与确诊的生殖道衣原体感染相关的严重生殖道并发症的发生率:乌普萨拉女性队列研究
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Jun;82(3):212-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.017186.
2
Risk of reproductive complications following chlamydia testing: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Denmark.沙眼衣原体检测后生殖并发症的风险:丹麦基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;16(9):1057-1064. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30092-5. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections--United States, 1995.1995年美国沙眼衣原体生殖器感染情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 Mar 7;46(9):193-8.
4
Assessing the number of genital chlamydial infections in the United States.评估美国生殖道衣原体感染的数量。
J Reprod Med. 1985 Mar;30(3 Suppl):269-72.
5
Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis.瑞典某县衣原体感染筛查与异位妊娠风险:生态分析
BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1776-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1776.
6
Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 6810 young women attending family planning clinics.6810名前往计划生育诊所就诊的年轻女性沙眼衣原体感染的危险因素
Int J STD AIDS. 1992 Mar-Apr;3(2):117-22. doi: 10.1177/095646249200300208.
7
Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection related to selected signs and symptoms of lower genital tract infections in women.沙眼衣原体感染的发病率与女性下生殖道感染的特定体征和症状的相关性
Hawaii Med J. 1990 Sep;49(9):332, 335-6 339.
8
[Genital Chlamydia infections. A seroepidemiologic study in Algiers].[生殖器衣原体感染。阿尔及尔的一项血清流行病学研究]
Arch Inst Pasteur Alger. 1989;57:73-82.
9
Food for thought in women's health. The gynecologist: the new European gatekeeper in Chlamydia trachomatis infection.女性健康的思考要点。妇科医生:沙眼衣原体感染的新欧洲把关人。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(10):1156-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340600880928.
10
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].[阿姆斯特丹性活跃人群沙眼衣原体生殖器感染的机会性筛查。II. 女性筛查的成本效益分析]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):677-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Cost-Effectiveness of Chlamydia Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review.揭示衣原体筛查策略的成本效益:一项系统评价
Port J Public Health. 2024 Nov 19;43(1):47-58. doi: 10.1159/000542685. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Reproductive tract complication risks following infections: a long-term prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2022.感染后的生殖道并发症风险:一项2008年至2022年的长期前瞻性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Aug 17;45:101027. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101027. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
-An Emerging Old Entity?- 一个新出现的古老实体?
Microorganisms. 2023 May 14;11(5):1283. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051283.
4
Association between serum antibody levels and infertility among reproductive-aged women in the U.S.血清抗体水平与美国育龄期女性不孕的关系
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 5;11:1117245. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117245. eCollection 2023.
5
Ascension of Chlamydia is moderated by uterine peristalsis and the neutrophil response to infection.沙眼衣原体的上升受到子宫蠕动和中性粒细胞对感染的反应的调节。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 7;17(9):e1009365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009365. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: systematic reviews on effectiveness and patient preferences.基层医疗保健中的衣原体和/或淋病筛查:有效性和患者偏好的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01658-w.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2021 Apr 19;193(16):E573-E584. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201967-f.
8
Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.关于在基层医疗中对未知高危个体进行衣原体和淋病筛查的建议。
CMAJ. 2021 Apr 19;193(16):E549-E559. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201967.
9
Pregnancies and Time to Pregnancy in Women With and Without a Previous Chlamydia trachomatis Infection.衣原体感染史对女性妊娠和备孕时间的影响。
Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Nov;47(11):739-747. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001247.
10
Near patient chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening and treatment in further education/technical colleges: a cost analysis of the 'Test n Treat' feasibility trial.基层医疗机构沙眼衣原体和淋病筛查与治疗:“检测即治疗”可行性试验的成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5062-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in clinical encounters for pelvic inflammatory disease and epididymitis in a national sample of Australian general practices.澳大利亚全科医疗全国样本中盆腔炎和附睾炎临床诊疗情况的趋势
Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Jun;17(6):384-6. doi: 10.1258/095646206777323436.
2
Discordance between trends in chlamydia notifications and hospital admission rates for chlamydia related diseases in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州衣原体通报趋势与衣原体相关疾病住院率之间的不一致。
Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Aug;81(4):318-22. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012807.
3
Costs and effects of chlamydial screening: dynamic versus static modeling.衣原体筛查的成本与效果:动态模型与静态模型对比
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Aug;32(8):474-83. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000161181.48687.cf.
4
Comparison of acute and subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease.急性与亚临床盆腔炎性疾病的比较
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Jul;32(7):400-5. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000154508.26532.6a.
5
Ectopic pregnancies and reproductive capacity after Chlamydia trachomatis positive and negative test results: a historical follow-up study.沙眼衣原体检测结果呈阳性和阴性后的异位妊娠与生殖能力:一项历史性随访研究
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Jun;32(6):377-81. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000154512.86651.07.
6
Screening for chlamydia.衣原体筛查
Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1539. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66449-5.
7
The natural course of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Colombian women: a 5-year follow-up study.哥伦比亚无症状女性沙眼衣原体感染的自然病程:一项5年随访研究。
J Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 15;191(6):907-16. doi: 10.1086/428287. Epub 2005 Feb 9.
8
Screening for chlamydial infection: are we doing enough?衣原体感染筛查:我们做得够吗?
Lancet. 2005;365(9458):456-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17880-5.
9
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis.15至29岁女性沙眼衣原体筛查:一项成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):501-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00006.
10
The correct approach to modelling and evaluating chlamydia screening.衣原体筛查建模与评估的正确方法。
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Aug;80(4):324-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.008458.