• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Service use and costs of supporting the most socially disabled patients in a hospital reprovision programme. A two-hospital comparison.

作者信息

McCrone Paul, Hallam Angela, Knapp Martin, Swaray Francis, Nazir Ana, Leff Julian, Szmidla Andrew

机构信息

P024 Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Health Services Research Dept., Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;41(8):656-61. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0075-x. Epub 2006 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-006-0075-x
PMID:16733629
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The UK, in common with other Western countries, has seen a marked reduction in the number of long-stay hospital beds over the past few decades and most asylums have been closed. Whilst hospital closure and discharge programmes differ, a common characteristic is likely to be that those patients who are "difficult-to-place" in the community are amongst the last to be discharged. This paper compares service use and costs of difficult-to-place patients from two UK hospitals (Friern and Warley) and identifies predictors of cost. One of these hospitals (Warley) provided a more intensive programme of rehabilitation.

METHOD

The study included 84 patients (Friern 63, Warley 21). Patient characteristics prior to discharge were recorded. Service use was measured and costs calculated for the year following discharge. Comparisons were made between the Warley and Friern groups and cost predictors were identified using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Post-discharge accommodation, in-patient and outpatient costs were substantially higher for the Friern group, whilst the Warley group had higher day care costs. The total mean costs were pound 13,432 higher for the Friern group. However, non-accommodation costs were substantially higher for the Warley group. Patients with more social skills had higher non-accommodation costs. Higher total costs were associated with more self-care skills, fewer domestic skills and younger age. Longer length of stay prior to discharge was associated with higher non-accommodation and total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The costs of care following discharge differed substantially between these two groups. This is partly a supply effect given the different strategies for caring for these difficult-to-place patients. In common with other studies, patient characteristics can explain some of the differences in future costs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Service use and costs of supporting the most socially disabled patients in a hospital reprovision programme. A two-hospital comparison.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;41(8):656-61. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0075-x. Epub 2006 May 29.
2
The cost effectiveness of specialised facilities for service users with persistent challenging behaviours.
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):429-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00322.x.
3
Service utilization and cost of community care for discharged state hospital patients: a 3-year follow-up study.州立医院出院患者社区护理的服务利用情况及成本:一项为期3年的随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):920-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.920.
4
Predictors of mental health-related acute service utilisation and treatment costs in the 12 months following an acute psychiatric admission.急性精神科入院后12个月内与心理健康相关的急性服务利用和治疗费用的预测因素。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;48(11):1048-58. doi: 10.1177/0004867414543566. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
5
The TAPS project. 3: Predicting the community costs of closing psychiatric hospitals.TAPS项目。3:预测关闭精神病医院的社区成本。
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Nov;157:661-70. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.5.661.
6
The costs of accommodation and care. Community provision for former long-stay psychiatric hospital patients.住宿和护理费用。为 former 长期住院精神病患者提供的社区服务。 (注:“former”在这里翻译为“之前的、从前的”,但结合语境,“former long-stay psychiatric hospital patients”更准确的表述可能是“曾经长期住院的精神病患者” ,整体译文可调整为:住宿和护理费用。为曾经长期住院的精神病患者提供的社区服务。 )
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;243(6):304-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02195724.
7
[Direct costs of acute day hospital care: results from a randomized controlled trial].[急性日间医院护理的直接成本:一项随机对照试验的结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 2005 Apr;32(3):132-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-834712.
8
Managing complex patients on a medical psychiatric unit: an observational study of university hospital costs associated with medical service use, length of stay, and psychiatric intervention.医疗精神病学病房中复杂患者的管理:与医疗服务使用、住院时间和精神科干预相关的大学附属医院成本的观察性研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Mar;68(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
9
[Evaluation of the closure of large psychiatric hospitals in England].[对英格兰大型精神病院关闭情况的评估]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993;41(4):292-7.
10
One-year cost implications of using mental health care after discharge from a general medical hospitalization.精神卫生保健在综合医院出院后的一年成本影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):672-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100457.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Mental Health Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.心理健康康复服务的有效性:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 13;11:607933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607933. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a special rehabilitation programme for patients who are difficult to place.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002 Nov;37(11):532-6. doi: 10.1007/s00127-002-0578-z.
2
The cost effectiveness of specialised facilities for service users with persistent challenging behaviours.
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):429-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00322.x.
3
Predicting the costs of community care for individuals with severe mental illness in South London.预测伦敦南部重度精神疾病患者的社区护理成本。
Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(4):653-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006904.
4
Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom.英国社区住宅支持、乡村社区和住宿校园的质量与成本。
Am J Ment Retard. 2000 Mar;105(2):81-102. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2.
5
Closing the asylums: where do all the former long-stay patients go?关闭精神病院:所有从前的长期住院患者都去哪儿了?
Health Trends. 1992;24(3):88-90.
6
Worcester Development Project: the closure and replacement of a mental hospital.伍斯特发展项目:一家精神病院的关闭与重建
Health Trends. 1990;22(4):141-5.
7
The TAPS Project 42: the last to leave hospital--a profile of residual long-stay populations and plans for their resettlement. Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services.TAPS项目42:最后一批出院者——长期住院剩余人群概况及其重新安置计划。精神科服务评估小组。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Nov;98(5):354-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10098.x.
8
Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) Project 33: prospective follow-up study of long-stay patients discharged from two psychiatric hospitals.精神科服务评估团队(TAPS)项目33:两家精神病医院出院的长期住院患者的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;153(10):1318-24. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.10.1318.
9
Difficult to place patients in a psychiatric hospital closure programme: the TAPs project 24.难以将患者纳入精神病院关闭计划:TAPs项目24
Psychol Med. 1996 Jul;26(4):765-74. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700037788.
10
The TAPS Project. 8: Design of the research study on the long-stay patients.TAPS项目。8:长期住院患者研究的设计。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):18-24.