Mulkern Robert V, Barnes Agnieszka Szot, Haker Steven J, Hung Yin P, Rybicki Frank J, Maier Stephan E, Tempany Clare M C
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;24(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
Detailed measurements of water diffusion within the prostate over an extended b-factor range were performed to assess whether the standard assumption of monoexponential signal decay is appropriate in this organ. From nine men undergoing prostate MR staging examinations at 1.5 T, a single 10-mm-thick axial slice was scanned with a line scan diffusion imaging sequence in which 14 equally spaced b factors from 5 to 3,500 s/mm(2) were sampled along three orthogonal diffusion sensitization directions in 6 min. Due to the combination of long scan time and limited volume coverage associated with the multi-b-factor, multidirectional sampling, the slice was chosen online from the available T2-weighted axial images with the specific goal of enabling the sampling of presumed noncancerous regions of interest (ROIs) within the central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ). Histology from prescan biopsy (n=9) and postsurgical resection (n=4) was subsequently employed to help confirm that the ROIs sampled were noncancerous. The CG ROIs were characterized from the T2-weighted images as primarily mixtures of glandular and stromal benign prostatic hyperplasia, which is prevalent in this population. The water signal decays with b factor from all ROIs were clearly non-monoexponential and better served with bi- vs. monoexponential fits, as tested using chi(2)-based F test analyses. Fits to biexponential decay functions yielded intersubject fast diffusion component fractions in the order of 0.73+/-0.08 for both CG and PZ ROIs, fast diffusion coefficients of 2.68+/-0.39 and 2.52+/-0.38 microm(2)/ms and slow diffusion coefficients of 0.44+/-0.16 and 0.23+/-0.16 um(2)/ms for CG and PZ ROIs, respectively. The difference between the slow diffusion coefficients within CG and PZ was statistically significant as assessed with a Mann-Whitney nonparametric test (P<.05). We conclude that a monoexponential model for water diffusion decay in prostate tissue is inadequate when a large range of b factors is sampled and that biexponential analyses are better suited for characterizing prostate diffusion decay curves.
为了评估单指数信号衰减的标准假设在前列腺器官中是否适用,我们在扩展的b值范围内对前列腺内的水扩散进行了详细测量。对9名正在接受1.5T前列腺磁共振分期检查的男性,使用线扫描扩散成像序列扫描了一个10毫米厚的单一轴向切片,在6分钟内沿着三个正交的扩散敏感方向对14个从5到3500 s/mm²等间距的b值进行采样。由于与多b值、多方向采样相关的长扫描时间和有限的体积覆盖范围的组合,从可用的T2加权轴向图像中在线选择切片,其特定目标是能够对中央腺体(CG)和外周区(PZ)内假定的非癌感兴趣区域(ROI)进行采样。随后采用扫描前活检(n = 9)和手术后切除(n = 4)的组织学检查来帮助确认采样的ROI是非癌的。CG ROI在T2加权图像上的特征主要是腺性和基质性良性前列腺增生的混合物,这在该人群中很常见。所有ROI的水信号随b值的衰减明显不是单指数的,双指数拟合比单指数拟合更合适,这是通过基于卡方的F检验分析进行测试的。对双指数衰减函数的拟合得出,CG和PZ ROI的受试者间快速扩散成分分数约为0.73±0.08,CG和PZ ROI的快速扩散系数分别为2.68±0.39和2.52±0.38 µm²/ms,慢速扩散系数分别为0.44±0.16和0.23±0.16 µm²/ms。用Mann-Whitney非参数检验评估,CG和PZ内慢速扩散系数之间的差异具有统计学意义(P <.05)。我们得出结论,当对大范围的b值进行采样时,前列腺组织中水扩散衰减的单指数模型是不充分的,双指数分析更适合于表征前列腺扩散衰减曲线。