Suppr超能文献

患者对胆固醇、心血管疾病风险及风险沟通策略的认知

Patients' perceptions of cholesterol, cardiovascular disease risk, and risk communication strategies.

作者信息

Goldman Roberta E, Parker Donna R, Eaton Charles B, Borkan Jeffrey M, Gramling Robert, Cover Rebecca T, Ahern David K

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):205-12. doi: 10.1370/afm.534.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite some recent improvement in knowledge about cholesterol in the United States, patient adherence to cholesterol treatment recommendations remains suboptimal. We undertook a qualitative study that explored patients' perceptions of cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and their reactions to 3 strategies for communicating CVD risk.

METHODS

We conducted 7 focus groups in New England using open-ended questions and visual risk communication prompts. The multidisciplinary study team performed qualitative content analysis through immersion/crystallization processes and analyzing coded reports using NVivo qualitative coding software.

RESULTS

All participants were aware that "high cholesterol" levels adversely affect health. Many had, however, inadequate knowledge about hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, and few knew their cholesterol numbers. Many assumed they had been tested and their cholesterol concentrations were healthy, even if their physicians had not mentioned it. Standard visual representations showing statistical probabilities of risk were assessed as confusing and uninspiring. A strategy that provides a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age was evaluated as clear, memorable, relevant, and potentially capable of motivating people to make healthful changes. A few participants in each focus group were concerned that a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age that was greater than chronological age would frighten patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex explanations about cholesterol and CVD risk appear to be insufficient for motivating behavior change. A cardiovascular risk-adjusted age calculator is one strategy that may engage patients in recognizing their CVD risk and, when accompanied by information about risk reduction, may be helpful in communicating risk to patients.

摘要

目的

尽管美国近期在胆固醇知识方面有所改善,但患者对胆固醇治疗建议的依从性仍不理想。我们开展了一项定性研究,探讨患者对胆固醇和心血管疾病(CVD)风险的认知以及他们对三种CVD风险沟通策略的反应。

方法

我们在新英格兰地区进行了7个焦点小组讨论,使用开放式问题和视觉风险沟通提示。多学科研究团队通过沉浸/结晶过程进行定性内容分析,并使用NVivo定性编码软件分析编码报告。

结果

所有参与者都意识到“高胆固醇”水平会对健康产生不利影响。然而,许多人对高胆固醇血症和CVD风险的了解不足,很少有人知道自己的胆固醇数值。许多人认为他们已经接受了检测,并且他们的胆固醇浓度是健康的,即使他们的医生没有提及。显示风险统计概率的标准视觉表示被认为令人困惑且缺乏吸引力。一种提供心血管风险调整年龄的策略被认为清晰、易记、相关,并且有可能促使人们做出健康改变。每个焦点小组中的一些参与者担心心血管风险调整年龄大于实际年龄会吓到患者。

结论

关于胆固醇和CVD风险的复杂解释似乎不足以促进行为改变。心血管风险调整年龄计算器是一种可能促使患者认识到其CVD风险的策略,并且当伴有降低风险的信息时,可能有助于向患者传达风险。

相似文献

4
5
Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active.
Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26(6):883-92. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0218.
6
Cholesterol complacency in Australia: time to revisit the basics of cardiovascular disease prevention.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(5):678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02507.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool for the promotion of healthier lifestyles.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):519-23. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328337ccd3.
9
Evaluation of community health screening participants' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jul-Aug;49(4):529-37; 4p following 537. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08120.
10
Barriers to effective implementation of guideline recommendations.
Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118 Suppl 12A:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the communication of multifactorial cancer risk assessment results for different audiences: a co-design process.
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):499-515. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00729-4. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Cross-sectional survey of attitudes and beliefs towards dementia risk reduction among Australian older adults.
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1021. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15843-0.
3
Cognitive and emotional reactions to pictorial-based risk communication on subclinical atherosclerosis: a qualitative study within the VIPVIZA trial.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Mar;41(1):69-80. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2178850. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Cardiovascular risk communication strategies in primary prevention. A systematic review with narrative synthesis.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3116-3140. doi: 10.1111/jan.15327. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
9
Communication With American Indians and Alaska Natives About Cardiovascular Disease.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Dec 17;17:E160. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200189.
10
Exploring public awareness of the current and future malaria risk zones in South Africa under climate change: a pilot study.
Int J Biometeorol. 2022 Feb;66(2):301-311. doi: 10.1007/s00484-020-02042-4. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Functional health literacy and the quality of physician-patient communication among diabetes patients.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Mar;52(3):315-23. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00107-1.
3
Health literacy, social support, and health: a research agenda.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(7):1309-21. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00329-0.
5
Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jan;52(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00248-3.
7
Patients' perspectives on statin therapy for treatment of hypercholesterolaemia: a qualitative study.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Jul;2(2):141-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00028-8.
8
Communicating risks through analogies.
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):749. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.749.
9
How do people with Type 2 diabetes perceive and respond to cardiovascular risk?
Diabet Med. 2003 May;20(5):355-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00910.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验