Goldman Roberta E, Parker Donna R, Eaton Charles B, Borkan Jeffrey M, Gramling Robert, Cover Rebecca T, Ahern David K
Department of Family Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):205-12. doi: 10.1370/afm.534.
Despite some recent improvement in knowledge about cholesterol in the United States, patient adherence to cholesterol treatment recommendations remains suboptimal. We undertook a qualitative study that explored patients' perceptions of cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and their reactions to 3 strategies for communicating CVD risk.
We conducted 7 focus groups in New England using open-ended questions and visual risk communication prompts. The multidisciplinary study team performed qualitative content analysis through immersion/crystallization processes and analyzing coded reports using NVivo qualitative coding software.
All participants were aware that "high cholesterol" levels adversely affect health. Many had, however, inadequate knowledge about hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, and few knew their cholesterol numbers. Many assumed they had been tested and their cholesterol concentrations were healthy, even if their physicians had not mentioned it. Standard visual representations showing statistical probabilities of risk were assessed as confusing and uninspiring. A strategy that provides a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age was evaluated as clear, memorable, relevant, and potentially capable of motivating people to make healthful changes. A few participants in each focus group were concerned that a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age that was greater than chronological age would frighten patients.
Complex explanations about cholesterol and CVD risk appear to be insufficient for motivating behavior change. A cardiovascular risk-adjusted age calculator is one strategy that may engage patients in recognizing their CVD risk and, when accompanied by information about risk reduction, may be helpful in communicating risk to patients.
尽管美国近期在胆固醇知识方面有所改善,但患者对胆固醇治疗建议的依从性仍不理想。我们开展了一项定性研究,探讨患者对胆固醇和心血管疾病(CVD)风险的认知以及他们对三种CVD风险沟通策略的反应。
我们在新英格兰地区进行了7个焦点小组讨论,使用开放式问题和视觉风险沟通提示。多学科研究团队通过沉浸/结晶过程进行定性内容分析,并使用NVivo定性编码软件分析编码报告。
所有参与者都意识到“高胆固醇”水平会对健康产生不利影响。然而,许多人对高胆固醇血症和CVD风险的了解不足,很少有人知道自己的胆固醇数值。许多人认为他们已经接受了检测,并且他们的胆固醇浓度是健康的,即使他们的医生没有提及。显示风险统计概率的标准视觉表示被认为令人困惑且缺乏吸引力。一种提供心血管风险调整年龄的策略被认为清晰、易记、相关,并且有可能促使人们做出健康改变。每个焦点小组中的一些参与者担心心血管风险调整年龄大于实际年龄会吓到患者。
关于胆固醇和CVD风险的复杂解释似乎不足以促进行为改变。心血管风险调整年龄计算器是一种可能促使患者认识到其CVD风险的策略,并且当伴有降低风险的信息时,可能有助于向患者传达风险。