Dunn A L, Marcus B H, Kampert J B, Garcia M E, Kohl H W, Blair S N
Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, Dallas, Texas 75230, USA.
Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26(6):883-92. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0218.
Project Active is a randomized clinical trial that compares a lifestyle physical activity intervention with a traditional structured exercise intervention. The purpose of this paper is to report 6-month results of these interventions on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among healthy, sedentary, middle-aged men and women, and to examine the psychological strategies used in each group (Lifestyle and Structured) to reach the level of physical activity recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and to achieve changes in these CVD risk factors.
A total of 116 initially sedentary men (mean +/- SD self-reported physical activity, 33.2 +/- 1.4 kcal.kg-1.day-1) and 119 women (32.9 +/- 1.0 kcal.kg-1.day-1), ages 35-60 years (46.0 +/- 6.7 years) were randomly assigned to a 6-month lifestyle physical activity counseling intervention or a 6-month gymnasium-based structured program. At baseline and 6 months, changes in lipid and lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations, blood pressure, and body composition and cognitive and behavioral measures of change were assessed. One-way analyses of variance with covariate adjustment were used to test for between-group differences in CVD risk factors. Associations between achieving the CDC/ACSM criterion and changes in cognitive and behavioral measures were assessed with multiple logistic regression models.
After 6 months of intervention, 78% of Lifestyle participants and 85% of Structured participants were meeting or exceeding the CDC/ACSM recommendation of accumulating 30 min or more of moderate-intensity physical activity on most, preferably all, days of the week. This was verified by a significant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness in both groups. The adjusted mean increase in maximal METs (VO2peak divided by 3.5 ml.kg-1.min-1) between treadmill tests was 0.4 kcal.kg-1.hr-1 (P < 0.001) for Lifestyle and 1.1 kcal.kg-1.hr-1 (P < 0.001) for Structured. There was a significant difference between intervention groups for this outcome. Both groups had significant reductions in total cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio, diastolic blood pressure, and percentage of body fat. There were no significant between-group differences in changes in these outcomes. Adjusted mean changes in total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and percentage of body fat in Lifestyle [in Structured] participants were -0.2 [-0.3] mmol.L-1, -3.2[-1.8] mm Hg, and -1.4 [-1.7] %, respectively. There were significant associations between achieving the CDC/ACSM physical activity criterion and greater use of the cognitive and behavioral strategies of change. Both groups changed self-efficacy and many of the behavioral measures, but there were no significant differences between intervention groups.
These results demonstrate that lifestyle physical activity counseling is as effective as structured exercise programs in increasing physical activity and improving CVD risk factors after 6 months among initially sedentary men and women. Furthermore, specific cognitive and behavioral counseling strategies were increased significantly as a result of the intervention. These strategies are effective and could be used in a wide variety of settings.
“积极项目”是一项随机临床试验,比较生活方式体育活动干预与传统结构化运动干预。本文旨在报告这些干预措施对健康、久坐不动的中年男性和女性心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素的6个月结果,并研究每组(生活方式组和结构化组)为达到疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和美国运动医学学院(ACSM)推荐的身体活动水平以及实现这些CVD风险因素变化所采用的心理策略。
总共116名最初久坐不动的男性(自我报告的平均身体活动量±标准差,33.2±1.4千卡·千克⁻¹·天⁻¹)和119名女性(32.9±1.0千卡·千克⁻¹·天⁻¹),年龄在35 - 60岁(46.0±6.7岁),被随机分配到为期6个月的生活方式体育活动咨询干预组或为期6个月的基于健身房的结构化项目组。在基线和6个月时,评估脂质和脂蛋白胆固醇浓度、血压、身体成分的变化以及变化的认知和行为指标。采用协变量调整的单因素方差分析来检验CVD风险因素的组间差异。使用多元逻辑回归模型评估达到CDC/ACSM标准与认知和行为指标变化之间的关联。
经过6个月的干预,78%的生活方式组参与者和85%的结构化组参与者达到或超过了CDC/ACSM关于每周大部分日子(最好是所有日子)积累30分钟或更多中等强度身体活动的建议。两组的心肺适能显著增加证实了这一点。跑步机测试之间,生活方式组最大代谢当量(VO₂峰值除以3.5毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)的调整后平均增加量为0.4千卡·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹(P < 0.001),结构化组为1.1千卡·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹(P < 0.001)。该结果在干预组之间存在显著差异。两组的总胆固醇、总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值、舒张压和体脂百分比均显著降低。这些结果的变化在组间无显著差异。生活方式组[结构化组]参与者的总胆固醇、收缩压和体脂百分比的调整后平均变化分别为 -0.2[-0.3]毫摩尔·升⁻¹、-3.2[-1.8]毫米汞柱和 -1.4[-1.7]%。达到CDC/ACSM身体活动标准与更多使用变化的认知和行为策略之间存在显著关联。两组都改变了自我效能和许多行为指标,但干预组之间无显著差异。
这些结果表明,生活方式体育活动咨询在最初久坐不动的男性和女性中,与结构化运动项目在增加身体活动和改善6个月后的CVD风险因素方面同样有效。此外,干预导致特定的认知和行为咨询策略显著增加。这些策略是有效的,可用于多种环境。