Suppr超能文献

新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的放疗与替莫唑胺治疗:EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 三期随机试验的递归划分分析

Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial.

作者信息

Mirimanoff René-Olivier, Gorlia Thierry, Mason Warren, Van den Bent Martin J, Kortmann Rolf-Dieter, Fisher Barbara, Reni Michele, Brandes Alba A, Curschmann Jüergen, Villa Salvador, Cairncross Gregory, Allgeier Anouk, Lacombe Denis, Stupp Roger

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;24(16):2563-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5963.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Canada trial on temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) in glioblastoma (GBM) has demonstrated that the combination of TMZ and RT conferred a significant and meaningful survival advantage compared with RT alone. We evaluated in this trial whether the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) retains its overall prognostic value and what the benefit of the combined modality is in each RPA class.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred seventy-three patients with newly diagnosed GBM were randomly assigned to standard postoperative RT or to the same RT with concomitant TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ. The primary end point was overall survival. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer RPA used accounts for age, WHO performance status, extent of surgery, and the Mini-Mental Status Examination.

RESULTS

Overall survival was statistically different among RPA classes III, IV, and V, with median survival times of 17, 15, and 10 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 32%, 19%, and 11%, respectively (P < .0001). Survival with combined TMZ/RT was higher in RPA class III, with 21 months median survival time and a 43% 2-year survival rate, versus 15 months and 20% for RT alone (P = .006). In RPA class IV, the survival advantage remained significant, with median survival times of 16 v 13 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 28% v 11%, respectively (P = .0001). In RPA class V, however, the survival advantage of RT/TMZ was of borderline significance (P = .054).

CONCLUSION

RPA retains its prognostic significance overall as well as in patients receiving RT with or without TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM, particularly in classes III and IV.

摘要

目的

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织和加拿大国立癌症研究所关于替莫唑胺(TMZ)与放疗(RT)治疗胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的试验表明,与单纯放疗相比,TMZ与RT联合使用可带来显著且有意义的生存优势。我们在该试验中评估了递归分割分析(RPA)是否仍保留其总体预后价值,以及联合治疗模式在每个RPA类别中的益处。

患者与方法

573例新诊断的GBM患者被随机分配至标准术后放疗组或相同放疗联合同步TMZ随后辅助TMZ治疗组。主要终点为总生存期。所采用的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织RPA考虑了年龄、世界卫生组织体能状态、手术范围和简易精神状态检查。

结果

RPA III、IV和V类别的总生存期在统计学上存在差异,中位生存期分别为17、15和10个月,2年生存率分别为32%、19%和11%(P <.0001)。RPA III类中TMZ/RT联合治疗的生存率更高,中位生存期为21个月,2年生存率为43%,而单纯放疗分别为15个月和20%(P =.006)。在RPA IV类中,生存优势仍然显著,中位生存期分别为16个月和13个月,2年生存率分别为28%和11%(P =.0001)。然而,在RPA V类中,RT/TMZ的生存优势具有临界显著性(P =.054)。

结论

RPA总体上以及在新诊断的GBM接受放疗联合或不联合TMZ治疗的患者中均保留其预后意义,尤其是在III类和IV类中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验