McClung Michael R, Siris Ethel, Cummings Steve, Bolognese Michael, Ettinger Mark, Moffett Alfred, Emkey Ronald, Day Wesley, Somayaji Veena, Lee Andrew
Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR 97213, USA.
Menopause. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):377-86. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000188736.69617.4f.
Osteoporosis is a significant health problem in postmenopausal women. Consequently, new and effective therapies are being sought to preserve bone mass and prevent osteoporosis in this population of women. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of lasofoxifene with raloxifene and placebo on indices of bone health in postmenopausal women.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active treatment-controlled study of 2 years duration was conducted. Women included 410 postmenopausal women aged 47 to 74 years. The four treatment groups were: lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, or 1.0 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo daily. All women received daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline to 2 years in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in all women having baseline and at least one follow-up bone density measurement. Total hip BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and safety were also evaluated in all women.
Both doses of lasofoxifene significantly increased lumbar spine BMD compared with raloxifene (P < or = 0.05) and with placebo treatment (P < or = 0.05). Least squares mean increases (95% CI) from baseline in lumbar spine BMD, compared with placebo, were 3.6% (1.9, 5.2) for lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, 3.9% (2.4, 5.5) for lasofoxifene 1.0 mg/day, and 1.7% (0.3, 3.0) for raloxifene. The two doses of lasofoxifene and raloxifene were equally effective at increasing total hip BMD. Lasofoxifene and raloxifene significantly reduced the levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover compared with placebo. In general, the effects of lasofoxifene were greater than the responses to raloxifene. At 2 years, lasofoxifene significantly (P < or = 0.05) reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 20.6% and 19.7% with 0.25 mg/day and 1 mg/day, respectively, compared with raloxifene (12.1%) and placebo (3.2%). Lasofoxifene and raloxifene had a similar adverse event profile with low rate of discontinuations due to adverse events.
Lasofoxifene may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.
骨质疏松是绝经后女性的一个重大健康问题。因此,人们正在寻求新的有效疗法来维持这一女性群体的骨量并预防骨质疏松。本研究的目的是比较拉索昔芬与雷洛昔芬及安慰剂对绝经后女性骨健康指标的影响。
进行了一项为期2年的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照和活性药物对照研究。研究对象包括410名年龄在47至74岁的绝经后女性。四个治疗组分别为:拉索昔芬0.25毫克/天、或1.0毫克/天、雷洛昔芬60毫克/天、或每日服用安慰剂。所有女性均每日补充钙和维生素D。主要终点是所有有基线及至少一次随访骨密度测量值的女性,从基线到2年时腰椎骨矿物质密度(BMD)的变化百分比。还对所有女性的全髋BMD、骨转换生化标志物、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇及安全性进行了评估。
与雷洛昔芬(P≤0.05)和安慰剂治疗(P≤0.05)相比,两种剂量的拉索昔芬均显著增加了腰椎BMD。与安慰剂相比,拉索昔芬0.25毫克/天组腰椎BMD从基线的最小二乘均值增加(95%CI)为3.6%(1.9,5.2),拉索昔芬1.0毫克/天组为3.9%(2.4,5.5),雷洛昔芬组为1.7%(0.3,3.0)。两种剂量的拉索昔芬和雷洛昔芬在增加全髋BMD方面同样有效。与安慰剂相比,拉索昔芬和雷洛昔芬显著降低了骨转换生化标志物水平。总体而言,拉索昔芬的效果大于对雷洛昔芬的反应。在2年时,与雷洛昔芬(12.1%)和安慰剂(3.2%)相比,拉索昔芬0.25毫克/天和1毫克/天分别显著(P≤0.05)降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平20.6%和19.7%。拉索昔芬和雷洛昔芬的不良事件谱相似,因不良事件停药率较低。
拉索昔芬可能是预防绝经后女性骨质流失的一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。