Suppr超能文献

运动与心脏病的时间生物学考量

Chronobiological considerations for exercise and heart disease.

作者信息

Atkinson Greg, Drust Barry, George Keith, Reilly Thomas, Waterhouse Jim

机构信息

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, UK.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2006;36(6):487-500. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636060-00003.

Abstract

Although regular physical activity is beneficial for many clinical conditions, an acute bout of exercise might increase the risk of an adverse clinical event, such as sudden cardiac death or myocardial infarction, particularly in vulnerable individuals. Since it is also known that the incidence of these events peaks in the morning and that some cardiac patients prefer to schedule leisure-time physical activity before lunch, the question arises as to whether morning exercise is 'inherently' more risky than physical activity performed at other times of day. We attempt to answer this question by reviewing the relevant epidemiological data as well as the results of chronobiological and exercise-related studies that have concentrated on the pathophysiological mechanisms for sudden cardiac events. We also consider generally how chronobiology might impact on exercise prescription in heart disease. We performed a structured literature search in the PubMed and WEBofSCIENCE databases for relevant studies published between 1981 and 2004. The limited amount of published epidemiological data did not allow us to conclude that a bout of vigorous exercise in the morning increases the relative risk of either primary cardiac events in apparently healthy individuals, or secondary events in cardiac patients enrolled in supervised exercise programmes. Nevertheless, these data are not directly relevant to individuals who have a history of heart disease and perform uncontrolled habitual activities. It appears as though the influence of time of day on the cardiovascular safety of this type of exercise has not been examined in this population. There is evidence that several pathophysiological variables (e.g. blood pressure, endothelial function, fibrinolysis) vary in parallel with typical diurnal changes in freely chosen activity. Nevertheless, few studies have been designed to examine specifically whether such variables respond differently to a 'set' level of exercise in the morning compared with the afternoon or evening. Even fewer researchers have adequately separated the influences of waking from sleep, adopting an upright posture and physical exertion per se on these pathophysiological responses at different times of day. In healthy individuals, exercise is generally perceived as more difficult and functional performance is decreased in the morning hours. These observations have been confirmed for patients with heart disease in only one small study. It has also not been confirmed, using an adequately powered study involving cardiac patients, that the responses of heart rate and oxygen consumption (VO(2)) to a set bout of exercise show the highest reactivity in the afternoon and evening, which is the case with healthy individuals. Confirmation of this circadian variation would be important, since it would mean that exercise might be prescribed at too high an intensity in the morning if heart rate or VO(2) responses are employed as markers of exercise load. We conclude that there is some parallelism between the diurnal changes in physical activity and those in the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with acute cardiac events. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to ascertain whether the responses of endothelial function, fibrinolysis and blood pressure to a set exercise regimen differ according to time of day. The results of epidemiological studies suggest that morning exercise is just as safe as afternoon exercise for cardiac patients enrolled in a supervised rehabilitation programme. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether time of day alters the risk of a cardiac event occurring during spontaneous physical activity performed by individuals with established risk factors for heart disease.

摘要

尽管规律的体育活动对许多临床病症有益,但一次剧烈运动可能会增加不良临床事件的风险,如心源性猝死或心肌梗死,尤其是在易患人群中。由于已知这些事件的发生率在早晨达到峰值,且一些心脏病患者更喜欢在午餐前安排休闲体育活动,因此出现了这样一个问题:晨练是否“本质上”比在一天中的其他时间进行体育活动风险更高。我们试图通过回顾相关的流行病学数据以及时间生物学和运动相关研究的结果来回答这个问题,这些研究集中在心脏性猝死事件的病理生理机制上。我们还总体考虑时间生物学可能如何影响心脏病患者的运动处方。我们在PubMed和WEBofSCIENCE数据库中进行了结构化文献检索,以查找1981年至2004年间发表的相关研究。已发表的流行病学数据有限,这使我们无法得出结论:早晨进行的一次剧烈运动增加了看似健康个体发生原发性心脏事件或参加有监督运动计划的心脏病患者发生继发性事件的相对风险。然而,这些数据与有心脏病史且进行无控制的习惯性活动的个体并无直接关联。似乎尚未在这一人群中研究一天中的时间对这类运动心血管安全性的影响。有证据表明,几个病理生理变量(如血压、内皮功能、纤维蛋白溶解)与自由选择活动中的典型昼夜变化平行。然而,很少有研究专门设计来检验这些变量在早晨与下午或晚上相比,对“设定”运动水平的反应是否不同。甚至更少的研究人员充分区分了从睡眠中醒来、采取直立姿势和运动本身对一天中不同时间这些病理生理反应的影响。在健康个体中,通常认为早晨运动更困难且功能表现会下降。只有一项小型研究对心脏病患者证实了这些观察结果。使用一项涉及心脏病患者的有足够样本量的研究也未证实,心率和耗氧量(VO₂)对一次设定运动的反应在下午和晚上表现出最高的反应性,而健康个体就是这种情况。证实这种昼夜变化很重要,因为这意味着如果将心率或VO₂反应用作运动负荷的指标,早晨运动的强度可能会规定得过高。我们得出结论,体育活动的昼夜变化与急性心脏事件相关的病理生理机制的昼夜变化之间存在一定的平行性。然而,需要更多研究来确定内皮功能、纤维蛋白溶解和血压对设定运动方案的反应是否因一天中的时间而异。流行病学研究结果表明,对于参加有监督康复计划的心脏病患者,晨练与下午锻炼一样安全。然而,尚不清楚一天中的时间是否会改变有既定心脏病风险因素的个体在自发体育活动期间发生心脏事件的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验