• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗洛雷斯岛早期石器技术及其对弗洛雷斯人(Homo floresiensis)的意义。

Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis.

作者信息

Brumm Adam, Aziz Fachroel, van den Bergh Gert D, Morwood Michael J, Moore Mark W, Kurniawan Iwan, Hobbs Douglas R, Fullagar Richard

机构信息

Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.

出版信息

Nature. 2006 Jun 1;441(7093):624-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04618.

DOI:10.1038/nature04618
PMID:16738657
Abstract

In the Soa Basin of central Flores, eastern Indonesia, stratified archaeological sites, including Mata Menge, Boa Lesa and Kobatuwa (Fig. 1), contain stone artefacts associated with the fossilized remains of Stegodon florensis, Komodo dragon, rat and various other taxa. These sites have been dated to 840-700 kyr bp (thousand years before present). The authenticity of the Soa Basin artefacts and their provenance have been demonstrated by previous work, but to quell lingering doubts, here we describe the context, attributes and production modes of 507 artefacts excavated at Mata Menge. We also note specific similarities, and apparent technological continuity, between the Mata Menge stone artefacts and those excavated from Late Pleistocene levels at Liang Bua cave, 50 km to the west. The latter artefacts, dated to between 95-74 and 12 kyr ago, are associated with the remains of a dwarfed descendent of S. florensis, Komodo dragon, rat and a small-bodied hominin species, Homo floresiensis, which had a brain size of about 400 cubic centimetres. The Mata Menge evidence negates claims that stone artefacts associated with H. floresiensis are so complex that they must have been made by modern humans (Homo sapiens).

摘要

在印度尼西亚东部弗洛勒斯岛中部的索阿盆地,包括马塔门格、博阿莱萨和科巴图瓦在内的分层考古遗址(图1),包含了与弗洛勒斯剑齿象、科莫多龙、大鼠及其他各种分类群的化石遗骸相关的石器。这些遗址的年代测定为距今84万年至70万年。此前的研究已经证明了索阿盆地文物的真实性及其出处,但为了消除 lingering doubts,我们在此描述在马塔门格发掘的507件文物的背景、特征和制作方式。我们还指出了马塔门格石器与在西边50公里处的梁布阿洞穴晚更新世地层中发掘的石器之间的特定相似之处以及明显的技术连续性。后者的文物年代测定为距今9.5万年至7.4万年和1.2万年前之间,与弗洛勒斯剑齿象的侏儒后裔、科莫多龙、大鼠以及一种脑容量约为400立方厘米的小个子人类物种弗洛勒斯人的遗骸有关。马塔门格的证据驳斥了一种说法,即与弗洛勒斯人相关的石器非常复杂,以至于它们一定是由现代人(智人)制造的。

相似文献

1
Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis.弗洛雷斯岛早期石器技术及其对弗洛雷斯人(Homo floresiensis)的意义。
Nature. 2006 Jun 1;441(7093):624-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04618.
2
Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia.来自印度尼西亚东部弗洛勒斯岛的一种新古人类的考古学与年代
Nature. 2004 Oct 28;431(7012):1087-91. doi: 10.1038/nature02956.
3
The Liang Bua faunal remains: a 95k.yr. sequence from Flores, East Indonesia.梁布亚动物群化石:来自印度尼西亚弗洛勒斯岛的 9.5 万年序列。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.015. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
4
Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores.弗洛勒斯人样化石来自弗洛勒斯岛的中更新世早期。
Nature. 2016 Jun 9;534(7606):245-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17999.
5
Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.来自印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯晚更新世的小体型古人类的进一步证据。
Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):1012-7. doi: 10.1038/nature04022.
6
Hominins on Flores, Indonesia, by one million years ago.一万年前印度尼西亚弗洛里斯岛上的古人类。
Nature. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):748-52. doi: 10.1038/nature08844. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
7
Continuities in stone flaking technology at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia.印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯岛梁布亚石器技术的连续性。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):503-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
8
LB1 and LB6 Homo floresiensis are not modern human (Homo sapiens) cretins.LB1 和 LB6 弗洛勒斯人并非现代人类(智人)的呆小症患者。
J Hum Evol. 2012 Feb;62(2):201-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.10.011. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
Preface: research at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia.前言:在印度尼西亚弗洛勒斯岛的良布阿进行的研究。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):437-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
10
Conclusions: implications of the Liang Bua excavations for hominin evolution and biogeography.结论:梁布亚发掘对人类进化和生物地理学的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):640-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.08.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Divergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolution.人科的分歧时间估计为理解人类进化中大脑化和体质量趋势提供了线索。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun;5(6):808-819. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01431-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Previously unknown human species found in Asia raises questions about early hominin dispersals from Africa.在亚洲发现的此前不为人知的人类物种引发了关于早期原始人类从非洲扩散的问题。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7751):176-178. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01019-7.
3
Quaternary vertebrate faunas from Sumba, Indonesia: implications for Wallacean biogeography and evolution.
印度尼西亚松巴岛的第四纪脊椎动物群:对华莱士生物地理学和进化的启示
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1278.
4
Age and context of the oldest known hominin fossils from Flores.弗洛勒斯已知最古老人类化石的年代和背景。
Nature. 2016 Jun 9;534(7606):249-53. doi: 10.1038/nature17663.
5
Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores.弗洛勒斯人样化石来自弗洛勒斯岛的中更新世早期。
Nature. 2016 Jun 9;534(7606):245-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17999.
6
Evidence in hand: recent discoveries and the early evolution of human manual manipulation.已有证据:近期的发现与人类手部操作的早期演化
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0105.
7
The avian fossil record in Insular Southeast Asia and its implications for avian biogeography and palaeoecology.东南亚岛屿地区的鸟类化石记录及其对鸟类生物地理学和古生态学的意义。
PeerJ. 2014 Mar 11;2:e295. doi: 10.7717/peerj.295. eCollection 2014.
8
Earliest known use of marine resources by Neanderthals.尼安德特人最早已知的海洋资源利用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024026. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
9
Hominins on Flores, Indonesia, by one million years ago.一万年前印度尼西亚弗洛里斯岛上的古人类。
Nature. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):748-52. doi: 10.1038/nature08844. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
10
Who Is LB1? Discriminant Analysis for the Classification of Specimens.LB1是谁?标本分类的判别分析。
Pattern Recognit. 2008 Nov;41(11):3436-3441. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.04.018.