• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LB1 和 LB6 弗洛勒斯人并非现代人类(智人)的呆小症患者。

LB1 and LB6 Homo floresiensis are not modern human (Homo sapiens) cretins.

机构信息

Palaeoanthropology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2012 Feb;62(2):201-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.10.011. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.10.011
PMID:22277102
Abstract

Excavations in the late Pleistocene deposits at Liang Bua cave, Flores, have uncovered the skeletal remains of several small-bodied and small-brained hominins in association with stone artefacts and the bones of Stegodon. Due to their combination of plesiomorphic, unique and derived traits, they were ascribed to a new species, Homo floresiensis, which, along with Stegodon, appears to have become extinct ∼17 ka (thousand years ago). However, recently it has been argued that several characteristics of H. floresiensis were consistent with dwarfism and evidence of delayed development in modern human (Homo sapiens) myxoedematous endemic (ME) cretins. This research compares the skeletal and dental morphology in H. floresiensis with the clinical and osteological indicators of cretinism, and the traits that have been argued to be associated with ME cretinism in LB1 and LB6. Contrary to published claims, morphological and statistical comparisons did not identify the distinctive skeletal and dental indicators of cretinism in LB1 or LB6 H. floresiensis. Brain mass, skeletal proportions, epiphyseal union, orofacial morphology, dental development, size of the pituitary fossa and development of the paranasal sinuses, vault bone thickness and dimensions of the hands and feet all distinguish H. floresiensis from modern humans with ME cretinism. The research team responsible for the diagnosis of ME cretinism had not examined the original H. floresiensis skeletal materials, and perhaps, as a result, their research confused taphonomic damage with evidence of disease, and thus contained critical errors of fact and interpretation. Behavioural scenarios attempting to explain the presence of cretinous H. sapiens in the Liang Bua Pleistocene deposits, but not unaffected H. sapiens, are both unnecessary and not supported by the available archaeological and geochronological evidence from Flores.

摘要

在弗洛勒斯的梁布亚洞穴的晚更新世沉积物中进行的挖掘工作,揭示了与石器工具和斑龙骨骼一起出土的几个小体型和小脑子人类的骨骼遗骸。由于它们具有原始、独特和衍生的特征,被归为一个新物种,弗洛勒斯人,它与斑龙一起似乎已经在约 17 千年前灭绝。然而,最近有人认为,弗洛勒斯人的几个特征与矮小症和现代人类(智人)地方性黏液水肿性呆小病(ME)呆小病患者的发育迟缓有关。这项研究比较了弗洛勒斯人的骨骼和牙齿形态与呆小病的临床和骨骼指标,以及被认为与 LB1 和 LB6 中的 ME 呆小病有关的特征。与已发表的说法相反,形态和统计比较并没有在 LB1 或 LB6 的弗洛勒斯人身上识别出呆小病的独特骨骼和牙齿指标。大脑质量、骨骼比例、骺联合、面形态、牙齿发育、蝶鞍大小和副鼻窦发育、颅顶骨厚度和手脚尺寸,所有这些都将弗洛勒斯人与患有 ME 呆小病的现代人类区分开来。负责诊断 ME 呆小病的研究团队没有检查过原始的弗洛勒斯人骨骼材料,也许因此,他们的研究将骨形态发生损伤与疾病证据混淆了,因此存在严重的事实和解释错误。试图解释在梁布亚更新世沉积物中存在呆小病的智人而不是未受影响的智人存在的行为场景,都是不必要的,并且也没有得到弗洛勒斯的可用考古学和地质年代学证据的支持。

相似文献

1
LB1 and LB6 Homo floresiensis are not modern human (Homo sapiens) cretins.LB1 和 LB6 弗洛勒斯人并非现代人类(智人)的呆小症患者。
J Hum Evol. 2012 Feb;62(2):201-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.10.011. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
2
Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species.梁布亚弗洛里斯人下颌骨和下颌牙齿:对一个新人种比较形态学的贡献。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):571-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
3
More on the Liang Bua finds and modern human cretins.更多关于弗洛勒斯岛洞穴(Liang Bua)的发现及现代人类克汀病。
Homo. 2012 Dec;63(6):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
4
Post-cranial skeletons of hypothyroid cretins show a similar anatomical mosaic as Homo floresiensis.患有呆小症的患者的颅后骨骼表现出与弗洛里斯人相似的解剖镶嵌现象。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 27;5(9):e13018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013018.
5
Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?弗洛勒斯人:小头畸形、类侏儒、南方古猿还是人属?
J Hum Evol. 2006 Oct;51(4):360-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.013. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
6
Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.来自印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯晚更新世的小体型古人类的进一步证据。
Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):1012-7. doi: 10.1038/nature04022.
7
Descriptions of the upper limb skeleton of Homo floresiensis.弗洛里斯人上肢骨骼描述。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):555-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
8
Conclusions: implications of the Liang Bua excavations for hominin evolution and biogeography.结论:梁布亚发掘对人类进化和生物地理学的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):640-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.08.003.
9
Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis.弗洛雷斯岛早期石器技术及其对弗洛雷斯人(Homo floresiensis)的意义。
Nature. 2006 Jun 1;441(7093):624-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04618.
10
Are the small human-like fossils found on Flores human endemic cretins?在弗洛勒斯岛发现的类人小化石是人类地方性克汀病患者吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1287-96. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1488.

引用本文的文献

1
Frontal sinuses and human evolution.额窦与人类进化。
Sci Adv. 2022 Oct 21;8(42):eabp9767. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abp9767.
2
A Critical Evaluation of the Down Syndrome Diagnosis for LB1, Type Specimen of Homo floresiensis.对弗洛勒斯人类型标本LB1唐氏综合征诊断的批判性评估。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 8;11(6):e0155731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155731. eCollection 2016.
3
Human evolution: Small remains still pose big problems.人类进化:微小遗骸仍带来大难题。
Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):427-9. doi: 10.1038/514427a.
4
Evolved developmental homeostasis disturbed in LB1 from Flores, Indonesia, denotes Down syndrome and not diagnostic traits of the invalid species Homo floresiensis.印尼弗洛勒斯岛的 LB1 存在进化发育内稳态紊乱,表明其患有唐氏综合征,而非无效物种弗洛勒斯人具有诊断特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 19;111(33):11967-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407382111. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
5
Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.弗洛勒斯人背景化:化石和病理性人类样本的几何形态计量比较分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e69119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069119. Print 2013.