• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Meadow, Southall, and the General Medical Council of the United kingdom.

作者信息

Chadwick David L, Krous Henry F, Runyan Desmond K

机构信息

Chadwick Center for Children and Families, Children's Hospital-San Diego, CA 91941, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2247-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0429.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2006-0429
PMID:16740871
Abstract

In this article we address the recent actions of the General Medical Council in the United Kingdom affecting 2 pediatricians who are major contributors to pediatric knowledge about the intentional suffocation of infants. The General Medical Council struck one of them from the register of licensed medical practitioners, but the decision was appealed successfully. The council restricted the practice of the other pediatrician. After a review of the transcripts of the hearings, we conclude that the opinions given by both doctors were responsible, and the transcripts suggest that the conduct of the hearings was unfair. Licensing boards may have difficulty in competently regulating doctors' expert testimony, at least in cases involving child maltreatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Meadow, Southall, and the General Medical Council of the United kingdom.
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2247-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0429.
2
Roy Meadow.罗伊·梅多
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):450. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67049-3.
3
The GMC should be investigated over its Southall and Meadow hearings.英国医学总会(GMC)在索撒尔和梅多听证会上的表现应该接受调查。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 19;343:d6708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6708.
4
The intimidation of British pediatricians.英国儿科医生所面临的恐吓。
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):797-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2472.
5
A dismal and dangerous verdict against Roy Meadow.对罗伊·梅多的一个阴沉且危险的裁决。
Lancet. 2005;366(9482):277-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66965-6.
6
Roy Meadow.罗伊·梅多
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):449-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67048-1.
7
The loneliness of the expert witness. General Medical Council v. Meadow.
Med Law Rev. 2007 Spring;15(1):116-25. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl022. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
8
United Kingdom General Medical Council fails child protection.
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):800-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1980.
9
Roy Meadow.罗伊·梅多
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):450-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67050-X.
10
In defence of Roy Meadow.为罗伊·梅多辩护。
Lancet. 2005;366(9479):3-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66798-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts on paediatricians testifying in cases of child maltreatment: protocol for a systematic review.对在虐待儿童案件中作证的儿科医生的影响:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2024 May 3;14(5):e081331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081331.
2
Nonaccidental trauma: clinical aspects and epidemiology of child abuse.非意外性创伤:儿童虐待的临床特征与流行病学
Pediatr Radiol. 2009 May;39(5):457-60. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1136-y. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
3
The jigsaw of child protection.儿童保护拼图。
J R Soc Med. 2008 Feb;101(2):93-4. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.081003.
4
Are children really safeguarded in the UK health service?在英国医疗服务体系中,儿童真的得到保障了吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jan;92(1):4-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.102574.