Deffenbacher Kenneth A, Bornstein Brian H, Penrod Steven D
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):287-307. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9008-1.
More than 25 years of research has accumulated concerning the possible biasing effects of mugshot exposure to eyewitnesses. Two separate metaanalyses were conducted on 32 independent tests of the hypothesis that prior mugshot exposure decreases witness accuracy at a subsequent lineup. Mugshot exposure both significantly decreased proportion correct and increased the false alarm rate, the effect being greater on false alarms. A mugshot commitment effect, arising from the identification of someone in a mugshot, was a substantial moderator of both these effects. Simple retroactive interference, where the target person is not included among mugshots and no one in a mugshot is present in the subsequent lineup, did not significantly impair target identification. A third metaanalysis was conducted on 19 independent tests of the hypothesis that failure of memory for facial source or context results in transference errors. The effect size was more than twice as large for "transference" studies involving mugshot exposure in proximate temporal context with the target than for "bystander" studies with no subsequent mugshot exposure.
关于向目击者展示嫌疑犯照片可能产生的偏差效应,已有超过25年的研究积累。针对“事先向目击者展示嫌疑犯照片会降低其在随后列队辨认中的准确性”这一假设,进行了两项独立的元分析,涉及32项独立测试。展示嫌疑犯照片显著降低了正确辨认比例,并提高了误报率,对误报率的影响更大。因在嫌疑犯照片中认出某人而产生的“嫌疑犯照片锁定效应”,是这两种效应的重要调节因素。单纯的追溯性干扰(即嫌疑犯照片中不包括目标人物,且随后列队辨认中没有嫌疑犯照片中的任何人),并不会显著损害目标辨认。针对“对面部来源或背景的记忆缺失会导致转移错误”这一假设,进行了第三项元分析,涉及19项独立测试。与没有后续嫌疑犯照片展示的“旁观者”研究相比,在与目标人物相近的时间背景下涉及嫌疑犯照片展示的“转移”研究的效应量要大两倍多。