• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

列队辨认表现的发展趋势:青少年比儿童和成年人更容易误认无辜的旁观者。

Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.

作者信息

Brackmann Nathalie, Sauerland Melanie, Otgaar Henry

机构信息

Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):428-440. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6
PMID:30478519
Abstract

We tested developmental trends in eyewitness identification in biased and unbiased lineups. Our main interest was adolescent's lineup performance compared with children and adults. 7-10-year-olds, 11-13-year-olds, 14-16-year-olds, and adults (N = 431) watched a wallet-theft-video and subsequently identified the thief, victim, and witness from simultaneous target-present and target-absent six-person photo lineups. The thief-absent lineup included a bystander previously seen in thief proximity. Research on unconscious transference suggested a selection bias toward the bystander in adults and 11-13-year-olds, but not in younger children. Confirming our hypothesis, adolescents were more prone to bystander bias than all other age groups. This may be due to adolescents making more inferential errors than children, as predicted by fuzzy-trace theory and associative-activation theory, combined with lower inhibition control in adolescents compared with adults. We also replicated a clothing bias for all age groups and age-related performance differences in our unbiased lineups. Consistent with previous findings, participants were generally overconfident in their decisions, even though confidence was a better predictor of accuracy in older compared with younger participants. With this study, we show that adolescents have an increased tendency to misidentify an innocent bystander. Continued efforts are needed to disentangle how adolescents in comparison to other age groups perform in forensically relevant situations.

摘要

我们测试了在有偏差和无偏差阵容中目击者辨认的发展趋势。我们主要感兴趣的是将青少年在阵容中的表现与儿童和成年人进行比较。7至10岁、11至13岁、14至16岁的青少年以及成年人(N = 431)观看了一段钱包盗窃视频,随后从同时呈现目标和不呈现目标的六人照片阵容中辨认出小偷、受害者和目击者。不包含小偷的阵容中有一名之前在小偷附近出现过的旁观者。关于无意识迁移的研究表明,成年人和11至13岁的青少年对旁观者存在选择偏差,而年幼儿童则不存在。正如我们所假设的,青少年比所有其他年龄组更容易出现旁观者偏差。这可能是由于青少年比儿童更容易做出推理错误,正如模糊痕迹理论和联想激活理论所预测的那样,再加上与成年人相比,青少年的抑制控制能力较低。我们还在无偏差阵容中重现了所有年龄组的服装偏差以及与年龄相关的表现差异。与之前的研究结果一致,参与者对自己的决定普遍过度自信,尽管与年轻参与者相比,年长者的信心是准确性的更好预测指标。通过这项研究,我们表明青少年误认无辜旁观者的倾向有所增加。需要继续努力来弄清楚与其他年龄组相比,青少年在法医相关情境中的表现如何。

相似文献

1
Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.列队辨认表现的发展趋势:青少年比儿童和成年人更容易误认无辜的旁观者。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):428-440. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6.
2
Children's susceptibility to misidentifying a familiar bystander from a lineup: When younger is better.
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):249-57. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9034-z.
3
Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.绝对判断模型比相对判断模型更能预测目击者的决策。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105877. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105877. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
4
Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup.增强现实辨认列队中的反射变量:利用信心、反应时间和与列队的接近程度评估儿童和成人目击证人辨认的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0308757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308757. eCollection 2024.
5
Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.公正和有偏差的列队辨认中目击证人错误率的评估。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;47(4):463-483. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000538.
6
Adult age differences in unconscious transference: source confusion or identity blending?成人在无意识转移中的年龄差异:来源混淆还是身份融合?
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):570-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03196098.
7
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias.儿童进行列队辨认:服装偏差的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Jun;28(3):339-54. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000029142.00834.e3.
9
The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.单一列队范式:一种在目击者识别实验中操纵目标存在的新方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000272.
10
Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.使证人在列队辨认过程中积极探索面部特征并重新摆出研究-测试姿势,可提高辨别力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301845120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301845120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time‑based Concealed Information Test: the effect of viewpoint congruency between test and encoding.基于反应时的隐蔽信息测试对目击证人辨认的诊断:测试和编码时视角一致性的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):639-651. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01857-1. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
The confidence-accuracy relationship for lineup decisions holds for the Dutch identification procedure.辨认程序的信心-准确性关系适用于荷兰辨认程序。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 11;18(4):e0284205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284205. eCollection 2023.
3
Time-of-day effects on eyewitness reports in morning and evening types.

本文引用的文献

1
Adolescents display distinctive tolerance to ambiguity and to uncertainty during risky decision making.青少年在冒险决策时表现出对模糊性和不确定性的独特容忍度。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 18;7:40962. doi: 10.1038/srep40962.
2
Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance.压力、压力诱导的皮质醇反应与目击证人辨认表现。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Jul;34(4):580-94. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2249. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control.
一天中的不同时段对晨型和夜型人的目击证人报告的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Mar 9;29(5):718-730. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1976298. eCollection 2022.
4
I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice.我懂得更多!新兴的元认知使青少年能够忽略错误的建议。
Dev Sci. 2021 Sep;24(5):e13101. doi: 10.1111/desc.13101. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality.目击证人辨认的表现不受时间最佳性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 10;11(1):3462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z.
6
Line-Up Image Position in Simultaneous and Sequential Line-Ups: The Effects of Age and Viewing Distance on Selection Patterns.同步和顺序列队中列队图像位置:年龄和观看距离对选择模式的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 1;11:1349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01349. eCollection 2020.
是什么激励着青少年?对奖励的神经反应及其对青少年冒险、学习和认知控制的影响。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Nov;70:135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
4
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation.双系统模型:综述、重新评估与再次确认
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;17:103-17. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions.中性和负面记忆错觉中发展趋势的可塑性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):31-55. doi: 10.1037/xge0000127.
6
Stress and emotional valence effects on children's versus adolescents' true and false memory.压力和情绪效价对儿童与青少年真实记忆和错误记忆的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(5):696-707. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1045909. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
7
Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.跨生命周期的目击证人识别:年龄差异的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;141(6):1228-65. doi: 10.1037/bul0000013. Epub 2015 May 25.
8
The production of spontaneous false memories across childhood.儿童期自发产生虚假记忆的情况。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.019. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
9
Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.快速且可靠:在一项现场研究中事后判断目击证人指认的准确性
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Mar;15(1):46-62. doi: 10.1037/a0014560.
10
Developmental reversals in false memory: a review of data and theory.错误记忆中的发展性逆转:数据与理论综述
Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):343-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.343.