• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字侦探:网络侦查降低了警方列队辨认中的目击证人识别准确率。

Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.

作者信息

Elphick Camilla, Philpot Richard, Zhang Min, Stuart Avelie, Pike Graham, Strathie Ailsa, Havard Catriona, Walkington Zoe, Frumkin Lara A, Levine Mark, Price Blaine A, Bandara Arosha K, Nuseibeh Bashar

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 15;12:640513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640513. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640513
PMID:33935892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081957/
Abstract

Eyewitnesses to crimes sometimes search for a culprit on social media before viewing a police lineup, but it is not known whether this affects subsequent lineup identification accuracy. The present online study was conducted to address this. Two hundred and eighty-five participants viewed a mock crime video, and after a 15-20 min delay either (i) viewed a mock social media site including the culprit, (ii) viewed a mock social media site including a lookalike, or (iii) completed a filler task. A week later, participants made an identification from a photo lineup. It was predicted that searching for a culprit on social media containing the lookalike (rather than the culprit) would reduce lineup identification accuracy. There was a significant association between social media exposure and lineup accuracy for the Target Present lineup (30% more of the participants who saw the lookalike on social media failed to positively identify the culprit than participants in the other conditions), but for the Target Absent lineup (which also included the lookalike) there was no significant association with lineup identification accuracy. The results suggest that if an eyewitness sees a lookalike (where they are expecting to see the culprit) when conducting a self-directed search on social media, they are less likely to subsequently identify the culprit in the formal ID procedure.

摘要

犯罪的目击者有时会在查看警方列队辨认之前在社交媒体上寻找罪犯,但尚不清楚这是否会影响随后列队辨认的准确性。本在线研究旨在解决这一问题。285名参与者观看了一段模拟犯罪视频,在延迟15 - 20分钟后,他们要么(i)查看一个包含罪犯的模拟社交媒体网站,(ii)查看一个包含外貌相似者的模拟社交媒体网站,要么(iii)完成一项填充任务。一周后,参与者从照片列队中进行辨认。据预测,在包含外貌相似者(而非罪犯)的社交媒体上搜索罪犯会降低列队辨认的准确性。对于目标存在的列队(在社交媒体上看到外貌相似者的参与者中,未能正确指认罪犯的比例比其他条件下的参与者多30%),社交媒体曝光与列队准确性之间存在显著关联,但对于目标不存在的列队(其中也包括外貌相似者),与列队辨认准确性没有显著关联。结果表明,如果目击者在社交媒体上进行自主搜索时看到了外貌相似者(他们原本期望看到罪犯),那么他们在随后的正式身份识别程序中识别罪犯的可能性就较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/e84cde6a3ac7/fpsyg-12-640513-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/a86f58cadafc/fpsyg-12-640513-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/3761a20ffd3f/fpsyg-12-640513-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/d4fb9b923eb3/fpsyg-12-640513-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/e84cde6a3ac7/fpsyg-12-640513-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/a86f58cadafc/fpsyg-12-640513-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/3761a20ffd3f/fpsyg-12-640513-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/d4fb9b923eb3/fpsyg-12-640513-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/8081957/e84cde6a3ac7/fpsyg-12-640513-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.数字侦探:网络侦查降低了警方列队辨认中的目击证人识别准确率。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 15;12:640513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640513. eCollection 2021.
2
Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.使用多项处理树模型从目击者识别数据衡量阵容公平性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33101-6.
3
Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.嫌疑人与陪衬者之间的表型不匹配而非表型偏差会增加对黑人嫌疑人的目击证人指认。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1233782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233782. eCollection 2024.
4
The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.决策偏差对预测目击证人列队辨认选择的重要性:迈向列队辨认技能测试
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jan 28;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0150-3.
5
Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.优化警察列队辨认中选择陪衬人的策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017292118.
6
Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.评估警方列队辨认中目击证人指认的可靠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516814112. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.预先识别信心与不同编码条件下目击者辨认的准确性有关。
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;45(6):524-541. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000452. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup.增强现实辨认列队中的反射变量:利用信心、反应时间和与列队的接近程度评估儿童和成人目击证人辨认的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0308757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308757. eCollection 2024.
9
The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.事前指示对目击证人辨认的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00471-4.
10
Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.怀疑目击证人列队辨认中的填充物相似性:文献综述与新方法
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000095. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction, Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based Systems.与旧的基于特征的系统相比,利用整体构建的面部合成技术的进步并不会导致目击证人错误识别的增加。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 28;10:1962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962. eCollection 2019.
2
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
3
Variability in photos of the same face.
同一张人脸照片的变化。
Cognition. 2011 Dec;121(3):313-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
4
Repeated eyewitness identification procedures: memory, decision making, and probative value.反复目击者识别程序:记忆、决策和证据价值。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Jun;34(3):241-58. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9187-7. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
5
Mug shot exposure effects: does size matter?
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Apr;33(2):175-82. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9126-z. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
6
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
7
Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference.面部照片曝光效应:追溯干扰、面部照片确认、源混淆和无意识迁移。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):287-307. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9008-1.
8
Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance.构建面部合成图像会损害列队辨认表现。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2005 Sep;11(3):147-156. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.147.