质量改进研究与发表的拟议标准：前进一步，后退两步。
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
作者信息
Pronovost P, Wachter R
机构信息
The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Surgery, and Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA.
出版信息
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):152-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018432.
Abstract
“Dumbing down” the scientific expectation of journals and readers regarding QI research may not be the answer
摘要
降低期刊和读者对质量改进研究的科学期望可能不是解决办法
相似文献
1
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):152-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018432.
2
Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):150-1. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017103.
3
Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):317-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015727.
4
"Racial" and ethnic classification: two steps forward and one step back?
Public Health Rep. 1997 Nov-Dec;112(6):477-80.
5
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):314. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016311.
6
Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
Can J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;56(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s12630-008-9027-0.
7
The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Oct;50(10):723. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03107.x.
8
[Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 May;69(5):297-302. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981459.
9
Cost analysis in medical journals: a study of current usage.
Hosp Cost Manag Account. 1997 Jul;9(4):1-7.
10
[Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Jun;66(6):370-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813230.
引用本文的文献
1
What Is the Impact of Care Bundles on the Prevalence or Incidence of Pressure Ulcers Among At-Risk Adults in the Acute Care Setting? A Systematic Review.
Int Wound J. 2025 Jun;22(6):e70693. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70693.
2
Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients: State of the Science.
Clin Geriatr Med. 2019 May;35(2):273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
A balanced approach to identifying, prioritising and evaluating all potential consequences of quality improvement: modified Delphi study.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023890. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023890.
4
Searching for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews on exercise. A descriptive study.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Mar-Apr;133(2):109-14. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.8040011.
5
Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0972-2. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
6
QUERI and implementation research: emerging from adolescence into adulthood: QUERI Series.
Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 6;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-12.
7
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
BMJ. 2009 Jan 19;338:a3152. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3152.
8
Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029066.
9
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2125-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
10
Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):387-99. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022194.
本文引用的文献
1
Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers.
JAMA. 2006 Jan 25;295(4):429-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.429.
2
Nurse staffing in hospitals: is there a business case for quality?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):204-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.204.
3
Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1506-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1287.
4
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):319-25. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787.
5
Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):317-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015727.
6
Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):315-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015669.
7
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):314. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016311.
8
Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2005;365(9477):2091-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66733-5.
9
Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):969-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533.
10
The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1239-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1239.
Zotero 插件