Chen E Elinor, Small Steven L
Department of Radiology, Brain Research Imaging Center, The University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brain Lang. 2007 Aug;102(2):176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
This paper explores how the test-retest reliability is modulated by different groups of participants and experimental tasks. A group of 12 healthy participants and a group of nine stroke patients performed the same language imaging experiment twice, test and retest, on different days. The experiment consists of four conditions, one audio condition and three audiovisual conditions in which the hands are either resting, gesturing, or performing self-adaptive movements. Imaging data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and the results were further used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each condition for each individual subject. By using area under the curve as a comparison index, we found that stroke patients have less reliability across time than healthy participants, and that when the participants gesture during speech, their imaging data are more reliable than when they are performing hand movements that are not speech-associated. Furthermore, inter-subject variability is less in the gesture task than in any of the other three conditions for healthy participants, but not for stroke patients.
本文探讨了重测信度如何受到不同参与者群体和实验任务的调节。一组12名健康参与者和一组9名中风患者在不同日期对同一语言成像实验进行了两次测试,即测试和重测。该实验包括四种条件,一种音频条件和三种视听条件,其中手部要么处于休息状态、做手势,要么进行自适应运动。使用多元线性回归分析成像数据,并将结果进一步用于为每个个体受试者的每种条件生成接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线。通过将曲线下面积作为比较指标,我们发现中风患者随时间的信度低于健康参与者,并且当参与者在说话时做手势时,他们的成像数据比进行与言语无关的手部运动时更可靠。此外,对于健康参与者,手势任务中的受试者间变异性比其他三种条件中的任何一种都小,但中风患者并非如此。