Giesen-Bloo Josephine, van Dyck Richard, Spinhoven Philip, van Tilburg Willem, Dirksen Carmen, van Asselt Thea, Kremers Ismay, Nadort Marjon, Arntz Arnoud
Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;63(6):649-58. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649.
Borderline personality disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition, prevalent throughout health care settings. Only limited effects of current treatments have been documented.
To compare the effectiveness of schema-focused therapy (SFT) and psychodynamically based transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) in patients with borderline personality disorder.
A multicenter, randomized, 2-group design.
Four general community mental health centers.
Eighty-eight patients with a Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score greater than a predetermined cutoff score.
Three years of either SFT or TFP with sessions twice a week.
Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score; quality of life; general psychopathologic dysfunction; and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts. Patient assessments were made before randomization and then every 3 months for 3 years.
Data on 44 SFT patients and 42 TFP patients were available. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were similar at baseline. Survival analyses revealed a higher dropout risk for TFP patients than for SFT patients (P = .01). Using an intention-to-treat approach, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found for both treatments on all measures after 1-, 2-, and 3-year treatment periods. After 3 years of treatment, survival analyses demonstrated that significantly more SFT patients recovered (relative risk = 2.18; P = .04) or showed reliable clinical improvement (relative risk = 2.33; P = .009) on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version. Robust analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that they also improved more in general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts (P<.001). Finally, SFT patients showed greater increases in quality of life than TFP patients (robust ANCOVAs, P=.03 and P<.001).
Three years of SFT or TFP proved to be effective in reducing borderline personality disorder-specific and general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP concepts and in improving quality of life; SFT is more effective than TFP for all measures.
边缘型人格障碍是一种严重的慢性精神疾病,在整个医疗环境中都很普遍。目前治疗的效果有限。
比较图式聚焦疗法(SFT)和基于精神动力学的移情聚焦心理治疗(TFP)对边缘型人格障碍患者的疗效。
多中心、随机、两组设计。
四个普通社区心理健康中心。
88名边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数第四版得分高于预定临界值的患者。
为期三年的SFT或TFP,每周两次治疗。
边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数第四版得分;生活质量;一般精神病理功能障碍;以及SFT/TFP人格概念的测量。在随机分组前以及随后的三年中每三个月对患者进行一次评估。
获得了44名接受SFT治疗患者和42名接受TFP治疗患者的数据。两组的社会人口统计学和临床特征在基线时相似。生存分析显示,TFP治疗患者的脱落风险高于SFT治疗患者(P = 0.01)。采用意向性分析方法,在1年、2年和3年治疗期后,两种治疗方法在所有测量指标上均有统计学和临床意义的改善。经过3年治疗,生存分析表明,在边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数第四版上,显著更多的SFT治疗患者康复(相对风险 = 2.18;P = 0.04)或显示出可靠的临床改善(相对风险 = 2.33;P = 0.009)。稳健协方差分析(ANCOVA)表明,他们在一般精神病理功能障碍和SFT/TFP人格概念测量方面的改善也更大(P < 0.001)。最后,SFT治疗患者的生活质量提高幅度大于TFP治疗患者(稳健ANCOVA,P = 0.03和P < 0.001)。
三年的SFT或TFP被证明在减少边缘型人格障碍特异性和一般精神病理功能障碍、SFT/TFP概念测量以及改善生活质量方面是有效的;在所有测量指标上,SFT比TFP更有效。