Loeb Mark, Carusone Soo Chan, Goeree Ron, Walter Stephen D, Brazil Kevin, Krueger Paul, Simor Andrew, Moss Lorraine, Marrie Thomas
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2503-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2503.
Nursing home residents with pneumonia are frequently hospitalized. Such transfers may be associated with multiple hazards of hospitalization as well as economic costs.
To assess whether using a clinical pathway for on-site treatment of pneumonia and other lower respiratory tract infections in nursing homes could reduce hospital admissions, related complications, and costs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized controlled trial of 680 residents aged 65 years or older in 22 nursing homes in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Nursing homes began enrollment between January 2, 2001, and April 18, 2002, with the last resident follow-up occurring July 4, 2005. Residents were eligible if they met a standardized definition of lower respiratory tract infection.
Treatment in nursing homes according to a clinical pathway, which included use of oral antimicrobials, portable chest radiographs, oxygen saturation monitoring, rehydration, and close monitoring by a research nurse, or usual care.
Hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, mortality, health-related quality of life, functional status, and cost.
Thirty-four (10%) of 327 residents in the clinical pathway group were hospitalized compared with 76 (22%) of 353 residents in the usual care group. Adjusting for clustering of residents in nursing homes, the weighted mean reduction in hospitalizations was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-18%; P = .001). The mean number of hospital days per resident was 0.79 in the clinical pathway group vs 1.74 in the usual care group, with a weighted mean difference of 0.95 days per resident (95% CI, 0.34-1.55 days; P = .004). The mortality rate was 8% (24 deaths) in the clinical pathway group vs 9% (32 deaths) in the usual care group, with a weighted mean difference of 2.9% (95% CI, -2.0% to 7.9%; P = .23). There were no significant differences between the groups in health-related quality of life or functional status. The clinical pathway resulted in an overall cost savings of US 1016 dollars per resident (95% CI, 207 dollars-1824 dollars) treated.
Treating residents of nursing homes with pneumonia and other lower respiratory tract infections with a clinical pathway can result in comparable clinical outcomes, while reducing hospitalizations and health care costs.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00157612.
患有肺炎的养老院居民经常住院。这种转院可能与多种住院风险以及经济成本相关。
评估在养老院使用临床路径对肺炎及其他下呼吸道感染进行现场治疗是否可以减少住院率、相关并发症及成本。
设计、地点和参与者:在加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿市22家养老院对680名65岁及以上居民进行的一项整群随机对照试验。养老院于2001年1月2日至2002年4月18日开始招募,最后一名居民随访于2005年7月4日结束。符合下呼吸道感染标准化定义的居民符合入选条件。
根据临床路径在养老院进行治疗,包括使用口服抗菌药物、便携式胸部X光检查、血氧饱和度监测、补液以及由研究护士进行密切监测,或常规护理。
住院率、住院时间、死亡率、健康相关生活质量、功能状态及成本。
临床路径组327名居民中有34名(10%)住院,而常规护理组353名居民中有76名(22%)住院。对养老院居民聚集情况进行校正后,住院率的加权平均降低为12%(95%置信区间[CI],5%-18%;P = .001)。临床路径组每名居民的平均住院天数为0.79天,而常规护理组为1.74天,每名居民的加权平均差异为0.95天(95% CI,0.34 - 1.55天;P = .004)。临床路径组的死亡率为8%(24例死亡),常规护理组为9%(32例死亡),加权平均差异为2.9%(95% CI,-2.0%至7.9%;P = .23)。两组在健康相关生活质量或功能状态方面无显著差异。临床路径使每名接受治疗的居民总体节省成本1016美元(95% CI,207美元 - 1824美元)。
采用临床路径治疗养老院患有肺炎及其他下呼吸道感染的居民可产生相当的临床结局,同时减少住院率和医疗成本。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00157612。