Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0311019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311019. eCollection 2024.
Older people in residential aged care are susceptible to acute illness or injury which may necessitate an ambulance call out, assessment/treatment by a paramedic and transfer to a hospital emergency department. Understanding the case mix of residential aged care ambulance attendances is important for prevention strategies and for planning services. A retrospective observational closed cohort study was designed to investigate the characteristics of emergency ambulance call outs to 15 residential aged care sites in the Australian Capital Territory over a 12-month period. Data were collected from the local ambulance service and the aged care sites. Case load data were analysed to determine rates, clinical characteristics, ambulance attendance outcomes and the temporal distribution of call outs. A Poisson regression model was developed to investigate demographic, morbidity and medication-related risk factors associated with the number of ambulance call outs per resident. Annual ambulance call out costs were estimated. There were 1,275 residents, with 396 (31.1%) requiring at least one ambulance call out over 12 months. Of 669 ambulance attendances, the majority (87.0%) were transported to emergency departments. Trauma (23.9%), pain (16.9%) and infections (9.4%) were the most common primary assessments by the ambulance attendees. Cases/day were similar throughout the year and on weekdays compared to weekends/public holidays. The main predictors of ambulance call out were multi-morbidity, taking regular anticholinergic medicines, being male and younger age. Estimated costs of ambulance call outs/year were $475/resident and $40,375/residential aged care site. The most frequent primary assessments (trauma, pain, infections) may constitute priorities for developing prevention strategies and for treatment initiatives within residential aged care. Strategies to reduce anticholinergic medication prescribing may also be a potential intervention to decrease ambulance call outs and hospital emergency department demand. The ambulance usage data from this study may be useful to compare with future datasets to measure the impact of the introduction of new services.
居住在养老院的老年人易患急性疾病或受伤,这可能需要呼叫救护车、护理人员评估/治疗并转至医院急诊科。了解养老院救护车出勤的病例组合对于预防策略和服务规划非常重要。本研究采用回顾性观察性封闭队列设计,调查了澳大利亚首都地区 15 个养老院在 12 个月期间的紧急救护车出勤情况。数据来自当地救护车服务和养老院。通过病例负荷数据分析确定了发生率、临床特征、救护车出勤结果以及呼叫的时间分布。采用泊松回归模型调查了与每位居民救护车呼叫次数相关的人口统计学、发病率和药物相关的危险因素。估计了年度救护车呼叫费用。共有 1275 名居民,其中 396 名(31.1%)在 12 个月内至少需要一次救护车呼叫。在 669 次救护车出勤中,大多数(87.0%)被送往急诊科。由救护车出勤人员进行的最常见的主要评估是创伤(23.9%)、疼痛(16.9%)和感染(9.4%)。全年和工作日与周末/公共假日相比,每天的病例数相似。救护车呼叫的主要预测因素是多病共存、定期服用抗胆碱能药物、男性和年轻。估计的救护车呼叫费用/年为 475 美元/居民和 40375 美元/养老院。最常见的主要评估(创伤、疼痛、感染)可能构成制定预防策略和在养老院进行治疗的优先事项。减少抗胆碱能药物处方的策略也可能是减少救护车呼叫和医院急诊科需求的潜在干预措施。本研究中的救护车使用数据可与未来数据集进行比较,以衡量新服务引入的影响。