Fulkerson Eric, Valle Craig J Della, Wise Brent, Walsh Michael, Preston Charles, Di Cesare Paul E
Musculoskeletal Research Center, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1231-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00004.
Currently, there is no consensus regarding the principles of empiric antibiotic treatment of suspected periprosthetic infection following total knee and hip arthroplasties. This study was undertaken to attempt to establish such principles.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 146 patients who had had a total of 194 positive cultures of specimens obtained at the time of a reoperation following a total knee or total hip arthroplasty at one of two institutions. Patient demographic data, comorbid conditions, bacterial species, the antibiotic sensitivity profile, and the postoperative day on which the culture tested positive were recorded.
Specimens from 110 hips and eighty-four knees were positive on culture. Seventy percent of the infections were classified as chronic; 17%, as acute postoperative; and 13%, as acute hematogenous. The mean time between the operation and the positive culture results was three days. Gram-positive organisms caused the majority of the infections. In the series as a whole, 88% of the bacteria were sensitive to gentamicin; 96%, to vancomycin; and 61%, to cefazolin. The most antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains were from patients for whom prior antibiotic treatment had failed. Acute postoperative infections had a greater resistance profile than did chronic or hematogenous infections. Bacteria isolated from patients with a hematogenous infection had a high sensitivity to both cefazolin and gentamicin.
Empiric antibiotic treatment for suspected periprosthetic infection should be guided by the class of the infection and the findings of Gram staining. We believe that, until the final culture results are available, acute hematogenous infections should initially be treated by a combination of cefazolin and gentamicin therapy. All chronic and acute postoperative infections with Gram-positive bacteria and all cases in which a Gram stain fails to identify bacteria should be managed with vancomycin. Infections with Gram-negative bacteria should be managed with a third or fourth-generation cephalosporin. Infections with mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria should be managed with a combination of vancomycin and a third or fourth-generation cephalosporin. Furthermore, we believe that if culture results and other confirmatory tests are not positive by the fourth postoperative day, termination of empiric antibiotic therapy should be considered.
目前,对于全膝关节和全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染疑似病例的经验性抗生素治疗原则尚无共识。本研究旨在尝试确立此类原则。
我们对146例患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在两家机构之一接受全膝关节或全髋关节置换术后再次手术时获取的标本共194次培养结果呈阳性。记录患者的人口统计学数据、合并症、细菌种类、抗生素敏感性谱以及培养结果呈阳性的术后天数。
110例髋关节和84例膝关节的标本培养结果呈阳性。70%的感染被归类为慢性;17%为术后急性感染;13%为急性血源性感染。手术至培养结果呈阳性的平均时间为三天。革兰氏阳性菌引起了大多数感染。在整个系列中,88%的细菌对庆大霉素敏感;96%对万古霉素敏感;61%对头孢唑林敏感。耐药性最强的菌株来自先前抗生素治疗失败的患者。术后急性感染的耐药性比慢性或血源性感染更强。从血源性感染患者中分离出的细菌对头孢唑林和庆大霉素均具有较高敏感性。
对于假体周围感染疑似病例的经验性抗生素治疗应根据感染类型和革兰氏染色结果来指导。我们认为,在最终培养结果出来之前,急性血源性感染最初应采用头孢唑林和庆大霉素联合治疗。所有革兰氏阳性菌引起的慢性和术后急性感染以及所有革兰氏染色未能鉴定出细菌的病例均应使用万古霉素治疗。革兰氏阴性菌感染应使用第三代或第四代头孢菌素治疗。革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌混合感染应使用万古霉素与第三代或第四代头孢菌素联合治疗。此外,我们认为如果术后第四天培养结果及其他确证性检查仍未呈阳性,则应考虑终止经验性抗生素治疗。