• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Importance of health care issues in 2005 presidential elections in Croatia.医疗保健问题在2005年克罗地亚总统选举中的重要性。
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):499-502.
2
Health care in the 2004 presidential election.2004年总统选举中的医疗保健问题。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1314-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042360.
3
The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.1980年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):231-8.
4
Does corruption undermine trust in health care? Results from public opinion polls in Croatia.腐败是否会破坏对医疗保健的信任?来自克罗地亚民意调查的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.033. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
5
Evaluation of Croatian model of polycentric health planning and decision making.
Health Policy. 2009 Mar;89(3):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.05.015. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
6
Has anyone seen it? Health care in Croatian elections.有人关注过吗?克罗地亚选举中的医疗保健问题。
East Eur Polit Soc. 2012;26(1):189-212.
7
Voters and health care in the 2004 election.2004年选举中的选民与医疗保健
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-86-W5-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.86.
8
Registered nurses' perspectives on health care and the 2008 presidential election.注册护士对医疗保健及2008年总统选举的看法。
Nurs Econ. 2008 Jul-Aug;26(4):227-35, 257.
9
Health care funding reforms in Croatia: a case of mistaken priorities.克罗地亚的医疗保健资金改革:一个 priorities 错误的案例 。(原句中“mistaken priorities”表述有误,可能是“misplaced priorities”,正确译文为:克罗地亚的医疗保健资金改革:一个 priorities 错误的案例 。(原句中“mistaken priorities”表述有误,可能是“misplaced priorities”,正确译文为:克罗地亚的医疗保健资金改革:一个优先事项错位的案例 ) (根据正确推测修改后的完整译文) 如果按照原错误内容直接翻译就是:克罗地亚的医疗保健资金改革:一个 priorities 错误的案例 ,但这样不太符合准确表达习惯。推测这里应该是“misplaced priorities”,意为“优先事项错位” 。 (补充说明,可根据实际需求选择是否保留)
Health Policy. 2007 Jan;80(1):144-57. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
10
Building new university hospital--what citizens know and policy makers should be aware of.建设新的大学医院——市民所了解的以及政策制定者应知晓的。
Coll Antropol. 2002 Dec;26(2):457-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care issues in Croatian elections 2005-2010: series of public opinion surveys.2005 - 2010年克罗地亚选举中的医疗保健问题:一系列民意调查
Croat Med J. 2011 Oct 15;52(5):585-92. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.585.

本文引用的文献

1
Croatian healthcare system in transition, from the perspective of users.从用户视角看转型中的克罗地亚医疗体系。
BMJ. 2005 Jul 23;331(7510):223-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.223.
2
The road to reform.改革之路。
BMJ. 2005 Jul 23;331(7510):170-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.170.
3
Health and health care in transitional Europe.转型期欧洲的健康与医疗保健
BMJ. 2005 Jul 23;331(7510):169-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.169.
4
Health care in the 2004 presidential election.2004年总统选举中的医疗保健问题。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1314-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042360.
5
UK parties set out their health stalls in lead-up to next election.英国各政党在下次选举前摆出了他们的医疗政策摊子。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.14.
6
Organization of health care in Croatia: needs and priorities.
Croat Med J. 1998 Sep;39(3):249-55.
7
The once and future health system in the former Yugoslavia: myths and realities.前南斯拉夫曾经的和未来的卫生系统:神话与现实
J Public Health Policy. 1993 Summer;14(2):220-37.

医疗保健问题在2005年克罗地亚总统选举中的重要性。

Importance of health care issues in 2005 presidential elections in Croatia.

作者信息

Dzakula Aleksandar, Polasek Ozren, Sosic Zvonko, Voncina Luka, Pavleković Gordana, Brborović Ognjen

机构信息

1Department of Social Medicine and Health Care Organization, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):499-502.

PMID:16758530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2080419/
Abstract

Health and health care provision are among the most important and politically sensitive public service areas. Politicians carefully incorporate health care program changes in their political agendas to gain votes. However, knowing health care priorities of the electoral body is not useful only to politicians, but also to health policy makers, as it enables them to target the most problematic areas in health care. We conducted a telephone survey of representative sample of voters (n=643) immediately before the presidential elections in Croatia in 2005, to determine the possible differences in health care priorities between left-wing and right-wing voters, and found a high level of homogeneity in their opinions. Health care organization, corruption, and financing issues were identified as the top priorities by both left- and right-wing voters. This agreement in voters' expectations, probably caused by a similar frame of mind of Croatian citizens inherited from pre-democratic times of self-government, could be used by health policy makers to rationally invest the means and efforts in dealing with the most problematic health care issues.

摘要

健康与医疗保健服务属于最重要且在政治上最敏感的公共服务领域。政治家们会谨慎地将医疗保健项目的变革纳入其政治议程以获取选票。然而,了解选举机构的医疗保健优先事项不仅对政治家有用,对卫生政策制定者也有用,因为这能使他们瞄准医疗保健中最具问题的领域。2005年克罗地亚总统选举前夕,我们对有代表性的选民样本(n = 643)进行了电话调查,以确定左翼和右翼选民在医疗保健优先事项上可能存在的差异,结果发现他们的意见高度一致。医疗保健组织、腐败和融资问题被左翼和右翼选民都列为首要优先事项。选民期望中的这种共识,可能是由于克罗地亚公民从前民主自治时期继承下来的类似思维模式所致,卫生政策制定者可利用这一共识合理投入资源和精力来处理最具问题的医疗保健问题。