Suppr超能文献

1980年选举中的堕胎问题。

The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.

作者信息

Granberg D, Burlison J

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):231-8.

PMID:6653742
Abstract

The political opponents of legal abortion achieved considerable gains in the 1980 American elections. A president who was committed to a strong antiabortion position was elected, and antiabortion candidates prevailed in six out of seven Senate races that pitted supporters against opponents of legal abortion and in seven out of nine similar confrontations in the House races. However, it is not clear that abortion was an overriding or decisive factor in determining those outcomes. Democrats and Republicans, Carter voters and Reagan voters did not differ significantly in their attitudes toward abortion. The presidential voter groups were divided on several other issues, and along income and racial lines, to a far greater extent than they were on abortion. Voters were not likely to name abortion as one of the more important problems facing the nation. Carter supporters rated abortion as more important than did Reagan supporters. Although the party platforms and the presidential candidates were clearly differentiated in their abortion stands, these differences were not well communicated to the citizenry. When voters attempted to describe the position of each candidate on abortion, they displayed a great deal of uncertainty, error and confusion. In the key Senate races, those who voted for the prochoice candidates held more liberal abortion attitudes than those who voted for the right-to-life candidates. This difference, although statistically significant, was not great, and was smaller than the differences related to several other issues--such as attitudes toward the role of government, women's rights and economic policies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

合法堕胎的政治反对者在1980年美国大选中取得了相当大的成果。一位坚定支持强烈反堕胎立场的总统当选,在七场支持与反对合法堕胎的参议院竞选较量中,反堕胎候选人在其中六场获胜,在九场类似的众议院竞选对抗中,他们在七场中获胜。然而,堕胎是否是决定这些选举结果的首要或决定性因素并不明确。民主党人和共和党人、卡特的选民和里根的选民在对堕胎的态度上并没有显著差异。总统选民群体在其他几个问题上存在分歧,并且在收入和种族方面的分歧程度,远比在堕胎问题上的分歧大得多。选民不太可能将堕胎列为国家面临的较为重要的问题之一。卡特的支持者比里根的支持者更看重堕胎问题。尽管政党纲领和总统候选人在堕胎立场上有明显差异,但这些差异并没有很好地传达给民众。当选民试图描述每位候选人在堕胎问题上的立场时,他们表现出了极大的不确定性、错误和困惑。在关键的参议院竞选中,投票支持支持堕胎权候选人的人比投票支持生命权候选人的人持有更自由的堕胎态度。这种差异虽然在统计上具有显著性,但并不大,而且比与其他几个问题相关的差异要小,比如对政府角色、妇女权利和经济政策的态度。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验