Suppr超能文献

头孢曲松与氨苄西林+甲硝唑用于清洁-污染性腹部手术后预防感染的比较

Ceftriaxone vs. ampicillin + metronidazole as prophylaxis against infections after clean-contaminated abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Luke M, Iversen J, Søndergaard J, Kvist E, Lund P, Andersen F, Naver L, Larsen P N, Clausen B, Prag J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Sundby Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1991 Jan;157(1):45-9.

PMID:1675881
Abstract

In a prospective, controlled, double-blind study, 496 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were given antibiotic prophylaxis with a single dose of either ceftriaxone or ampicillin + metronidazole. No significant intergroup difference was found between the respective overall rates of infectious complications (3.2% and 4.9%). Analysis of the microbiologic findings showed incisional wound infections, mainly caused by gram-negative rods, to be more common in the ampicillin-metronidazole group, whereas deep wound infections were more frequent in the ceftriaxone group. It is concluded that ceftriaxone seems to be more efficient than ampicillin-metronidazole as prophylaxis against incisional wound infection, but should preferably be supplemented with an antianaerobic agent to prevent deep wound infections.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、对照、双盲研究中,496例接受腹部手术的患者接受了单剂量头孢曲松或氨苄西林+甲硝唑的抗生素预防治疗。在各自的感染并发症总发生率(分别为3.2%和4.9%)之间未发现显著的组间差异。微生物学检查结果分析显示,氨苄西林-甲硝唑组切口感染更为常见,主要由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起,而头孢曲松组深部伤口感染更为频繁。得出的结论是,作为预防切口感染的药物,头孢曲松似乎比氨苄西林-甲硝唑更有效,但最好补充一种抗厌氧菌药物以预防深部伤口感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验