• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期结直肠手术中预防性单剂量磷霉素和甲硝唑与新霉素、杆菌肽、甲硝唑及氨苄西林的比较

Prophylactic single-dose fosfomycin and metronidazole compared with neomycin, bacitracin, metronidazole and ampicillin in elective colorectal operations.

作者信息

Nøhr M, Andersen J C, Juul-Jensen K E

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology A, Aalborg Sygehus Syd, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1990 Mar;156(3):223-30.

PMID:2186587
Abstract

Two antibiotic regimens for the prophylaxis of infection after colorectal operations were compared in a prospective, double blind, randomised controlled trial in 244 patients. Ninety-five patients (39%) were either excluded before randomisation or withdrawn, leaving 149 for analysis. Group 1 (n = 72) received a single infusion of 8 g fosfomycin and 1 g metronidazole at the induction of anaesthesia. Group 2 (n = 77) received bacitracin 250 mg plus neomycin 250 mg (as four tablets on three occasions over two days), metronidazole 500 mg tablets three times a day for one day, and ampicillin 1 g intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. Nine patients in group 1 (13%), 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9 to 22.4, developed infective complications, compared with 8 in group 2 (10%), 95% CI 4.6 to 19.4. The overall infection rate was 17 of 149 evaluable patients (11%), 95% CI 6.8 to 17.7. Seven patients died (five in group 1 and 2 in group 2), two of whom (one in each group) died as a direct result of infective complications. Long operations and obesity were the most important risk factors, and may indicate a need for longer prophylaxis. Fosfomycin, which is mainly active against aerobic bacteria, was both safe and useful when combined with metronidazole.

摘要

在一项针对244例患者的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验中,对两种用于预防结直肠手术后感染的抗生素方案进行了比较。95例患者(39%)在随机分组前被排除或退出,剩余149例用于分析。第1组(n = 72)在麻醉诱导时接受8克磷霉素和1克甲硝唑单次输注。第2组(n = 77)接受杆菌肽250毫克加新霉素250毫克(分三天,每次四片),甲硝唑500毫克片剂,每日三次,共一天,以及在麻醉诱导时静脉注射氨苄西林1克。第1组有9例患者(13%),95%置信区间(CI)为6.9至22.4,发生感染性并发症,而第2组有8例(10%),95%CI为4.6至19.4。在149例可评估患者中,总体感染率为17例(11%),95%CI为6.8至17.7。7例患者死亡(第1组5例,第2组2例),其中2例(每组各1例)直接死于感染性并发症。手术时间长和肥胖是最重要的危险因素,可能表明需要更长时间的预防。主要对需氧菌有活性的磷霉素与甲硝唑联合使用既安全又有效。

相似文献

1
Prophylactic single-dose fosfomycin and metronidazole compared with neomycin, bacitracin, metronidazole and ampicillin in elective colorectal operations.择期结直肠手术中预防性单剂量磷霉素和甲硝唑与新霉素、杆菌肽、甲硝唑及氨苄西林的比较
Acta Chir Scand. 1990 Mar;156(3):223-30.
2
Fosfomycin/metronidazole compared with doxycycline/metronidazole for the prophylaxis of infection after elective colorectal surgery. A randomised double-blind multicentre trial in 517 patients.
Eur J Surg. 1992 Mar;158(3):181-5.
3
Comparison of systemic prophylaxis with metronidazole/placebo and metronidazole/fosfomycin in colorectal surgery. A clinical study demonstrating the need for additional anti-aerobic prophylactic cover.甲硝唑/安慰剂与甲硝唑/磷霉素用于结直肠手术全身预防的比较。一项临床研究表明需要额外的抗需氧菌预防性覆盖。
Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(4):317-23.
4
Is neomycin necessary for bowel preparation in surgery of the colon? Oral neomycin plus erythromycin versus erythromycin-metronidazole.结肠手术中肠道准备有必要使用新霉素吗?口服新霉素加红霉素与红霉素-甲硝唑对比。
Can J Surg. 1989 Jul;32(4):265-70.
5
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 10% mannitol mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral neomycin and short-term, perioperative, intravenous Flagyl as prophylaxis in elective colorectal resections.一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,旨在探讨10%甘露醇机械性肠道准备联合口服新霉素及短期围手术期静脉注射甲硝唑在择期结直肠切除术中作为预防措施的效果。
Surgery. 1985 Nov;98(5):861-5.
6
Effectiveness of single dose prophylaxis with cefotaxime and metronidazole compared with three doses of cefotaxime alone in elective colorectal surgery.在择期结直肠手术中,头孢噻肟与甲硝唑单剂量预防用药与单独使用三剂量头孢噻肟的有效性比较。
Eur J Surg. 1993 Mar;159(3):177-80.
7
[Preventive use of single dose antibiotics in acute appendicitis. Results of a prospective randomized clinical study].[急性阑尾炎单剂量抗生素预防性使用。一项前瞻性随机临床研究的结果]
Zentralbl Chir. 1989;114(20):1348-54.
8
Prophylactic regimens in colorectal surgery. Comparison between metronidazole used alone or in combination with either ampicillin or doxycycline.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;90:37-52.
9
["Single shot" prevention in abdominal surgery. Antibiotics with long half-life (ceftriaxone, ornidazole) vs. antibiotics with short half-life (cefazolin, metronidazole, clindamycin)].腹部手术中的“单次给药”预防。长半衰期抗生素(头孢曲松、奥硝唑)与短半衰期抗生素(头孢唑林、甲硝唑、克林霉素)的对比
Helv Chir Acta. 1994 Apr;60(4):483-8.
10
Antibiotics in elective colon surgery. A randomized trial of oral, systemic, and oral/systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis.择期结肠手术中的抗生素。口服、全身及口服/全身联合应用抗生素预防的随机试验。
Am Surg. 1990 Apr;56(4):251-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Oral Antibiotic Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis.口服抗生素准备在择期结直肠手术中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):43-58. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003145.
2
Intravenous Fosfomycin: An Assessment of Its Potential for Use in the Treatment of Systemic Infections in Canada.静脉注射磷霉素:对其在加拿大用于治疗全身性感染的潜力评估。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018 Jun 25;2018:8912039. doi: 10.1155/2018/8912039. eCollection 2018.
3
Adverse Events Associated with Fosfomycin Use: Review of the Literature and Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
磷霉素相关不良事件:文献回顾及 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库分析。
Infect Dis Ther. 2015 Dec;4(4):433-58. doi: 10.1007/s40121-015-0092-8. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
4
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术的抗菌预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD001181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub4.
5
Combination of oral non-absorbable and intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服不吸收抗生素与静脉用抗生素联合与单纯静脉用抗生素预防结直肠手术后手术部位感染的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Dec;15(4):385-95. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0714-4. Epub 2011 Jul 23.