Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病和糖耐量受损患者的颈动脉内膜中层厚度:一项系统评价

Carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review.

作者信息

Brohall G, Odén A, Fagerberg B

机构信息

Institute of Internal Medicine and Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2006 Jun;23(6):609-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01725.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To review the difference in carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) between patients with Type 2 diabetes (DM) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and control subjects.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were made in order to identify cross-sectional studies using the ultrasound method. The differences between IMT in DM or IGT and control subjects were calculated. Meta-analysis using random-effects modelling was used to calculate summary measures.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies included 24,111 subjects; 4019 with DM and 1110 with IGT. In 20 of 21 studies, the diabetic patients had greater carotid artery IMT than the subjects in the control groups. The estimated mean difference in IMT was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.12-0.14) mm. Heterogeneity was observed and likely sources of variation were study size, diabetes duration, and ultrasound method. In three out of nine studies, the IGT patients had significant greater carotid artery IMT than the subjects in the control groups. The estimated mean difference in IMT was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.014-0.071) mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes was associated with an 0.13 mm increase in IMT compared with control subjects. In patients with IGT, the increase in IMT was about one-third of that observed in diabetes. The observed difference in IMT can be interpreted as if the diabetes patients were more than 10 years older than the control groups, and that the relative risks of myocardial infarction and stroke were increased by almost 40%, respectively.

摘要

目的

回顾2型糖尿病(DM)或糖耐量受损(IGT)患者与对照者之间颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)的差异。

方法

进行系统评价以识别使用超声方法的横断面研究。计算DM或IGT患者与对照者之间IMT的差异。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析以计算汇总指标。

结果

23项研究纳入了24111名受试者;4019名患有DM,1110名患有IGT。在21项研究中的20项里,糖尿病患者的颈动脉IMT大于对照组受试者。IMT的估计平均差异为0.13(95%可信区间:0.12 - 0.14)mm。观察到了异质性,变异的可能来源是研究规模、糖尿病病程和超声方法。在9项研究中的3项里,IGT患者的颈动脉IMT显著大于对照组受试者。IMT的估计平均差异为0.04(95%可信区间:0.014 - 0.071)mm。

结论

与对照者相比,2型糖尿病与IMT增加0.13 mm相关。在IGT患者中,IMT的增加约为糖尿病患者中观察到的增加量的三分之一。观察到的IMT差异可以解释为糖尿病患者比对照组大10岁以上,并且心肌梗死和中风的相对风险分别增加了近40%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验