• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用癌症中心癌症登记处识别符合遗传性乳腺癌综合征检测条件的新患病女性:实际考量

On using a cancer center cancer registry to identify newly affected women eligible for hereditary breast cancer syndrome testing: practical considerations.

作者信息

DeMarco Tiffani A, Loffredo Christopher A, Sampilo Marilyn L, Tercyak Kenneth P

机构信息

Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20007-2401, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-9006-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-005-9006-3
PMID:16761104
Abstract

The goals of this research were to describe the process of identifying and recruiting individuals registered with a cancer center's cancer registry who were eligible to participate in cancer genetic research. This study specifically focused on younger women with personal and family cancer histories strongly suggestive of hereditary breast cancer syndromes, as determined by genetic counselor review. Of special interest was to determine the proportion of women from minority backgrounds who were (a) identifiable in this manner and (b) interested in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer through a family cancer clinical research program. An initial query of the 292 cases of women newly affected with breast cancer and contained within the registry indicated that 124 met demographic eligibility criteria. The personal and family cancer histories of each of these women were then reviewed by a genetic counselor and the remaining, eligible patients (n = 31) were subsequently contacted by mail and telephone: approximately three-fifths (18/31) of these patients were White and two-fifths (13/31) were Black or of another racial background. Of the women who were sent one or more study-related mailings, 10% (3/31) were unreachable by telephone due to incorrect contact information, 32% (10/31) were reachable by telephone but unresponsive to messages left, 26% (8/31) had already participated in the family cancer program (i.e., were positive controls), 6% (2/31) were interested in participating in the program, 23% (7/31) were uninterested in participating in the program, and 3% (1/31) were later determined to be ineligible. Comparing the racial backgrounds of women who were either positive controls or interested in participating (i.e., "tester" category) to women who were either unreachable, nonresponsive, uninterested, or ineligible (i.e., "nontester" category), there was a nonsignificant trend for more non-White women to fall into the nontester than tester category, Fisher's Exact Test = .09. This work underscores practical steps in planning and carrying-out cancer genetic testing research among women newly affected with breast cancer and members of special populations. It also underscores the role that genetic counseling professionals play in this process.

摘要

本研究的目标是描述识别和招募在癌症中心癌症登记处注册且有资格参与癌症基因研究的个体的过程。本研究特别关注那些经遗传咨询师评估,个人和家族癌症病史强烈提示遗传性乳腺癌综合征的年轻女性。特别感兴趣的是确定来自少数族裔背景的女性中,(a) 以这种方式可识别的比例,以及 (b) 通过家庭癌症临床研究项目对遗传性乳腺癌基因检测感兴趣的比例。对登记处记录的292例新患乳腺癌的女性病例进行初步查询后发现,124例符合人口统计学资格标准。随后,遗传咨询师对这些女性每人的个人和家族癌症病史进行了审查,并通过邮件和电话联系了其余符合条件的患者(n = 31):这些患者中约五分之三(18/31)为白人,五分之二(13/31)为黑人或其他种族背景。在收到一份或多份与研究相关邮件的女性中,10%(3/31)因联系信息错误无法通过电话联系到,32%(10/31)可通过电话联系到但未回复留下的信息,26%(8/31)已参加过家庭癌症项目(即作为阳性对照),6%(2/31)有兴趣参加该项目,23%(7/31)对参加该项目不感兴趣,3%(1/31)后来被确定不符合条件。将作为阳性对照或有兴趣参加(即“测试者”类别)的女性的种族背景与无法联系到、无反应、不感兴趣或不符合条件(即“非测试者”类别)的女性进行比较,非白人女性更多地属于非测试者类别而非测试者类别,这一趋势无统计学意义,费舍尔精确检验 = 0.09。这项工作强调了在新患乳腺癌的女性和特殊人群成员中规划和开展癌症基因检测研究的实际步骤。它还强调了遗传咨询专业人员在这一过程中所起的作用。

相似文献

1
On using a cancer center cancer registry to identify newly affected women eligible for hereditary breast cancer syndrome testing: practical considerations.利用癌症中心癌症登记处识别符合遗传性乳腺癌综合征检测条件的新患病女性:实际考量
J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-9006-3.
2
Contribution of extended family history in assessment of risk for breast and colon cancer.家族病史在评估乳腺癌和结肠癌风险中的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Sep 1;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0521-0.
3
Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.女性对乳腺癌风险基因检测的兴趣:社会人口统计学和知识的影响
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jan;11(1):89-95.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
5
Falling through the cracks. Women's experiences of ineligibility for genetic testing for risk of breast cancer.被忽视。女性在乳腺癌风险基因检测中不具备资格的经历。
Can Fam Physician. 2000 Jul;46:1449-56.
6
Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.通过电话服务扩大BRCA1/2基因咨询的可及性:一项整群随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 5;106(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju328. Print 2014 Dec.
7
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
8
Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.参与乳腺癌易感性检测方案:招募来源、利他主义及家庭参与对女性决策的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):377-83.
9
[Screening for breast cancer on basis of individual risk assessment for women ineligible for the national population screening program].[基于个体风险评估对不符合国家人群筛查计划的女性进行乳腺癌筛查]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Jan 20;145(3):120-5.
10
Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.落实针对低收入女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000 Mar 31;49(RR-2):37-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study.成人癌症幸存者问题解决技能训练:Bright IDEAS-AC 初步研究。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;31:100552. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100552. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children.母亲在向子女传达BRCA1/2癌症基因检测结果方面的信息需求。
Genet Test. 2007 Fall;11(3):249-55. doi: 10.1089/gte.2006.0534.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenge of recruitment.招聘的挑战。
Nurse Res. 2005;13(1):78-84. doi: 10.7748/nr2005.07.13.1.78.c6001.
2
Why cancer centers matter.癌症中心为何重要。
Cancer Biol Ther. 2005 Apr;4(4):493-5. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.4.1647. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
3
Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.BRCA1/BRCA2基因突变检测在新诊断乳腺癌患者中的应用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Apr;14(4):1003-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0545.
4
Using a population-based cancer registry for recruitment of newly diagnosed patients with ovarian cancer.利用基于人群的癌症登记系统招募新诊断的卵巢癌患者。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb;28(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000138967.62532.2e.
5
Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes.遗传性癌症易感性综合征。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 10;23(2):276-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.042.
6
Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心手术效果更好吗?
Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):435-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20785.
7
Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic.基于不确定信息的决策:从一家高危乳腺癌诊所的女性患者中学习经验
J Genet Couns. 2004 Jun;13(3):221-36. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000027958.02383.a9.
8
Clinical genetic counselling for familial cancers requires reliable data on familial cancer risks and general action plans.针对家族性癌症的临床遗传咨询需要有关家族性癌症风险的可靠数据和总体行动计划。
J Med Genet. 2004 Nov;41(11):801-7. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.022731.
9
Hereditary cancer: guidelines in clinical practice--general overview.遗传性癌症:临床实践指南——概述
Ann Oncol. 2004;15 Suppl 4:iv121-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh915.
10
Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.家族性基因研究中参与者识别与招募的伦理问题。
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 1;130A(4):424-31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30234.