Dranitsaris George, Vincent Mark, Crowther Mark
Augmentium Pharma Consulting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(6):593-607. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624060-00006.
In a recent randomised trial (CLOT [Comparison of Low molecular weight heparin versus Oral anticoagulant Therapy for long term anticoagulation in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism]), which evaluated secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, dalteparin reduced the relative risk of recurrent VTEs by 52% compared with oral anticoagulation therapy (p = 0.002). A Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted to measure the economic value of dalteparin for this indication.
The study was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system. The first part of this study utilised the CLOT trial database, from which resource utilisation data were converted into Canadian cost estimates (Can dollars, year 2005 values). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to compare the total cost of therapy between patients randomised to treatment with dalteparin or oral therapy. Health state utilities and treatment preferences were then measured in 24 oncology care providers using the time trade-off technique.
When all of the cost components were combined for the entire population (n = 676), patients in the dalteparin group had significantly higher overall costs than the control group (Can dollars 4162 vs Can dollars 2003; p < 0.001). The preference assessment revealed that 23 of 24 respondents (96%) selected dalteparin over warfarin, with an associated gain of 0.157 QALYs. When the incremental cost of dalteparin (Can dollars 2159 per patient) was combined with the QALY gain, the findings revealed that dalteparin was associated with a cost of approximately Can dollars 13,800 (95% CI 12,400, 15,100) per QALY gained.
Given the practical advantages of dalteparin in terms of convenience, improved efficacy and the acceptable economic value, this analysis suggests that long-term dalteparin therapy is a sound alternative to warfarin for the prevention of recurrent VTEs in patients with cancer.
在一项近期的随机试验(CLOT[低分子量肝素与口服抗凝治疗对癌症合并静脉血栓栓塞患者长期抗凝作用的比较])中,评估了癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的二级预防,与口服抗凝治疗相比,达肝素使复发性VTE的相对风险降低了52%(p = 0.002)。进行了一项加拿大药物经济学分析,以衡量达肝素用于该适应症的经济价值。
该研究是从加拿大医疗保健系统的角度进行的。本研究的第一部分利用了CLOT试验数据库,从中将资源利用数据转换为加拿大成本估算(加元,2005年价值)。进行单因素和多因素回归分析,以比较随机接受达肝素治疗或口服治疗的患者之间的总治疗成本。然后使用时间权衡技术在24名肿瘤护理提供者中测量健康状态效用和治疗偏好。
当将所有成本成分合并用于整个人群(n = 676)时,达肝素组患者的总体成本显著高于对照组(4162加元对2003加元;p < 0.001)。偏好评估显示,24名受访者中有23名(96%)选择达肝素而非华法林,相关的质量调整生命年(QALY)增益为0.157。当将达肝素的增量成本(每位患者2159加元)与QALY增益相结合时,结果显示,达肝素每获得一个QALY的成本约为13,800加元(95%可信区间12,400,15,100)。
鉴于达肝素在便利性、疗效改善和可接受的经济价值方面的实际优势,该分析表明,长期使用达肝素治疗是华法林预防癌症患者复发性VTE的合理替代方案。